Meeting the needs of critical care patients after discharge home: a qualitative exploratory study of patient perspectives

Authors

  • Laura Allum MRes,

    Corresponding author
    1. School of Health Science, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
    2. Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Unit, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, Lambeth, London SE1 7EH, UK
    • Address for correspondence: L Allum, Lane Fox Respiratory Physiology Research Unit, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, Lambeth, London SE1 7EH, UK

      E-mail: laura.allum@city.ac.uk

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Bronwen Connolly PhD,

    1. Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Unit, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, Lambeth, London SE1 7EH, UK
    2. Centre for Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
    3. Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, 16th Floor, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Eamonn McKeown PhD

    1. School of Health Science, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

ABSTRACT

Background

With improved survival rates in critical care, increasing focus is being placed on survivorship and how best to support patients in returning to their former activity. Little is known about what support patients themselves view as important, and this has implications for the efficacy and acceptability of services provided.

Objectives

To describe former critical care patients' perspectives on the support needed to optimize recovery.

Study design

This is a qualitative exploratory study of the experiences of support received by critical care survivors.

Research methodology

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 12 critical care survivors recruited from a charity and a patient and public involvement group. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis to describe patterns in the participants' experiences.

Findings

Four themes of support were described: effective management of transfer anxiety, tailored information provision, timely access to services and a supportive social network.

Conclusion

Survivors of critical care should be equipped with information about their critical care stay, ongoing health issues and recovery and should be provided with holistic care at home. Critical care follow up was an effective way of meeting many of these needs, but this needs to be flexible to be useful to attendees. Peer support groups (face-to-face and online) provided information, reassurance, a social network and an avenue for those who had longer-lasting problems than current services provide for.

Relevance to clinical practice

Whilst there are commonalities in the problems faced by critical care survivors, recovery is highly individualized, and current support services do not have sufficient flexibility to cater for this. This study shows that many survivors experience after-effects of critical care that outlast the support they are given. These longer-term survivors are often excluded from research studies because of fears of recall bias, resulting in poor understanding of their experiences.

Ancillary