• Please log in or register to access this feature.
You have free access to this content

The effect of luminal content and rate of occlusion on the interpretation of colonic manometry

  1. J. W. Arkwright1,
  2. A. Dickson1,2,
  3. S. A. Maunder1,
  4. N. G. Blenman1,
  5. J. Lim3,
  6. G. O’Grady3,4,
  7. R. Archer5,
  8. M. Costa6,
  9. N. J. Spencer6,
  10. S. Brookes6,
  11. A. Pullan5,
  12. P. G. Dinning6

Article first published online: 10 DEC 2012

DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12051

Issue

Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Volume 25, Issue 1, pages e52–e59, January 2013

Additional Information

How to Cite

Arkwright, J. W., Dickson, A., Maunder, S. A., Blenman, N. G., Lim, J., O’Grady, G., Archer, R., Costa, M., Spencer, N. J., Brookes, S., Pullan, A. and Dinning, P. G. (2013), The effect of luminal content and rate of occlusion on the interpretation of colonic manometry. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 25: e52–e59. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12051

Author Information

  1. 1

    CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Lindfield, NSW, Australia

  2. 2

    Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

  3. 3

    Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, New Zealand

  4. 4

    Dept of Surgery and Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, New Zealand

  5. 5

    Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand

  6. 6

    Department of Human Physiology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia

* Address for Correspondence J. W. Arkwright, CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Bradfield Road, Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia. Tel: +612 9413 7064; fax: +612 9413 7200; e-mail: john.arkwright@csiro.au

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 20 DEC 2012
  2. Article first published online: 10 DEC 2012
  3. Received: 15 June 2012 Accepted for publication: 30 October 2012

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (564K)

References

  • 1
    Jones MP, Post J, Crowell MD. High-resolution manometry in the evaluation of anorectal disorders: a simultaneous comparison with water-perfused manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 850–5.
    Direct Link:
  • 2
    Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 27–37.
  • 3
    Smout AJPM. Recent developments in gastrointestinal motility. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 2006; 41: 25–31.
  • 4
    Sarna SK. Colonic Motility: From Bench Side to Bedside. 2011/04/01 San Rafael, CA 7: Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences, 2010.
  • 5
    von der Ohe MR, Hanson RB, Camilleri M. Comparison of simultaneous recordings of human colonic contractions by manometry and a barostat. Neurogastroenterol Mot 1994; 6: 213–22.
  • 6
    van den Berg MM, Hogan M, Caniano DA, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA, Mousa HM. Colonic manometry as predictor of cecostomy success in children with defecation disorders. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41: 730–6; discussion 730-736.
  • 7
    Dinning PG, Szczesniak MM, Cook IJ. Proximal colonic propagating pressure waves sequences and their relationship with movements of content in the proximal human colon. Neurogastroenterol Mot 2008; 20: 512–20.
    Direct Link:
  • 8
    Hausken T, Mundt M, Samsom M. Low antroduodenal pressure gradients are responsible for gastric emptying of a low-caloric liquid meal in humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2002; 14: 97–105.
    Direct Link:
  • 9
    Brasseur JG, Dodds WJ. Interpretation of intraluminal manometric measurements in terms of swallowing mechanics. Dysphagia 1991; 6: 100–19.
  • 10
    Ritchie JA, Ardran GM, Truelove SC. Motor activity of the sigmoid colon of humans. A combined study by intraluminal pressure recording and cineradiography. Gastroenterology 1962; 43: 642–68.
  • 11
    Dent J, Chir B. A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement. Gastroenterology 1976; 71: 263–7.
  • 12
    Gregersen H. Biomechanics of the Gastrointestinal Tract: New Perspectives in Motility Research and Diagnostics. London: Springer, 2003.
  • 13
    Arkwright JW, Blenman NG, Underhill ID et al. In-vivo demonstration of a high resolution optical fiber manometry catheter for diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders. Opt Express 2009; 17: 4500–8.
  • 14
    Arkwright JW, Underhill ID, Maunder SA et al. Design of a high-sensor count fibre optic manometry catheter for in-vivo colonic diagnostics. Opt Express 2009; 17: 22423–31.
  • 15
    Sarna SK, Prasad KR, Lang IM. Giant migrating contractions of the canine cecum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 1988; 254: G595–G601.
  • 16
    Dapoigny M, Trolese JF, Bommelaer G, Tournut R. Myoelectric spiking activity of right colon, left colon, and rectosigmoid of healthy humans. Dig Dis Sci 1988; 33: 1007–12.
  • 17
    Dinning PG, Hunt L, Arkwright JW et al. Pancolonic motor response to subsensory and suprasensory sacral nerve stimulation in patients with slow-transit constipation. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1002–10.
    Direct Link:
  • 18
    Dinning PG, Zarate N, Szczesniak MM et al. Bowel preparation affects the amplitude and spatiotemporal organization of colonic propagating sequences. Neurgastroenterol Mot 2010; 22: 633–e176.
    Direct Link:
  • 19
    Bampton PA, Dinning PG, Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, Cook IJ. Prolonged multi-point recording of colonic manometry in the unprepared human colon: providing insight into potentially relevant pressure wave parameters. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1838–48.
    Direct Link:
  • 20
    Dinning PG, Bampton PA, Andre J et al. Abnormal predefecatory colonic motor patterns define constipation in obstructed defecation. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 49–56.
  • 21
    Sinnott MD, Cleary PW, Arkwright JW, Wang C, Dinning PG. Investigating the relationships between peristaltic contraction and fluid transport in the human colon using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Comp Biol Med 2012; 42: 492–503.
  • 22
    Scott M. Manometric techniques for the evaluation of colonic motor activity: current status. Neurogastroenterol Mot 2003; 15: 483–513.
    Direct Link:
  • 23
    Kamm MA, van der Sijp JRM, Lennard-Jones JE. Observations on the characteristics of stimulated defaecation in severe idiopathic constipation. Int J Colorect Dis 1992; 7: 197–201.
  • 24
    Bampton PA, Dinning PG, Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, deCarle DJ, Cook IJ. Spatial and temporal organization of pressure patterns throughout the unprepared colon during spontaneous defecation. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1027–35.
    Direct Link:
  • 25
    Cook IJ, Furukawa Y, Panagopoulos V, Collins PJ, Dent J. Relationships between spatial patterns of colonic pressure and individual movements of content. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2000; 278: G329–G341.
  • 26
    Bassotti G, Gaburri M, Imbimbo BP et al. Colonic mass movements in idiopathic chronic constipation. Gut 1988; 29: 1173–9.
  • 27
    Di Lorenzo C, Flores AF, Reddy SN, Hyman PE. Use of colonic manometry to differentiate causes of intractable constipation in children. J Pediatr 1992; 120: 690–5.
  • 28
    Rao SS, Sadeghi P, Beaty J, Kavlock R. Ambulatory 24-hour colonic manometry in slow-transit constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2405–16.
    Direct Link:
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (564K)