SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agrawal AF, Brodie ED III, Wade MJ. 2001. On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. American Naturalist 158: 308323.
  • Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716723.
  • Astles PA, Moore AJ, Preziosi RF. 2005. Genetic variation in response to an indirect ecological effect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 272: 25772581.
  • Barbour RC, O'Reilly-Wapstra JM, De Little DW, Jordan GJ, Steane DA, Humphreys JR, Bailey JK, Whitham TG, Potts BM. 2009. A geographic mosaic of genetic variation within a foundation tree species and its community-level consequences. Ecology 90: 17621772.
  • Bergsma R, Kanis E, Knol EF, Bijma P. 2008. The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Genetics 178: 15591570.
  • Bhatt MV, Khandelwal A, Dudley SA. 2011. Kin recognition, not competitive interactions, predicts root allocation in young Cakile edentula seedling pairs. New Phytologist 189: 11351142.
  • Biedrzycki ML, Jilany TA, Dudley SA, Bais HP. 2010. Root exudates mediate kin recognition in plants. Communicative and Integrative Biology 3: 18.
  • Bijma P. 2010a. Fisher's fundamental theorem of inclusive fitness and the change in fitness due to natural selection when conspecifics interact. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 194206.
  • Bijma P. 2010b. Estimating indirect genetic effects: precision of estimates and optimum designs. Genetics 186: 10131028.
  • Bijma P. 2011. A general definition of the heritable variation that determines the potential of a population to respond to selection. Genetics 189: 13471359.
  • Bijma P, Muir WM, Ellen ED, Wolf JB, Van Arendonk JAM. 2007b. Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 289299.
  • Bijma P, Muir WA, Van Arendonk JAM. 2007a. Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 277288.
  • Bijma P, Wade MJ. 2008. The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 11751188.
  • Binkley D, Stape JL, Ryan MG, Barnard HR, Fownes J. 2002. Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystems 5: 5867.
  • Botto JF, Smith H. 2002. Differential genetic variation in adaptive strategies to a common environmental signal in Arabidopsis accessions: phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 5363.
  • Boyden S, Binkley D, Stape JL. 2008. Competition among Eucalyptus trees depends on genetic variation and resource supply. Ecology 89: 28502859.
  • Callaway RM, Walker LR. 1997. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78: 19581965.
  • Cappa EP, Cantet RJC. 2008. Direct and competition additive effects in tree breeding: Bayesian estimation from an individual tree mixed model. Silvae Genetica 57: 4556.
  • Carnegie AJ, Ades PK. 2002. The proportion of leaf spots caused by Mycosphaerella cryptica and M. nubilosa on Eucalyptus globulus, E. nitens and their F1 hybrids in a family trial in Tasmania, Australia. Australasian Mycologist 21: 5363.
  • Casper BB, Jackson RB. 1997. Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 545570.
  • Chambers PGS, Borralho NMG, Potts BM. 1996. Genetic analysis of survival in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genetica 45: 107112.
  • Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Potts BM. 2011. The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus. Heredity 107: 5060.
  • Costa e Silva J, Kerr R. 2012. Accounting for competition in genetic analysis, with particular emphasis on forest genetic trials. Tree Genetics and Genomes. doi: 10.1007/s11295-012-0521-8
  • Costa e Silva J, Potts B, Tilyard P. 2012. Epistasis causes outbreeding depression in eucalypt hybrids. Tree Genetics and Genomes 8: 249265.
  • Crous PW, Braun U, Groenewald JZ. 2007. Mycosphaerella is polyphyletic. Studies in Mycology 58: 132.
  • Debarre F, Lion S, van Baalen M, Gandon S. 2012. Evolution of host life-history traits in a spatially structured host-parasite system. American Naturalist 179: 5263.
  • Denison RF, Kiers ET, West SA. 2003. Darwinian agriculture: when can humans find solutions beyond the reach of natural selection? Quarterly Review of Biology 78: 145168.
  • Detilleux JC. 2005. Genetic management of infectious diseases: a heterogeneous epidemio-genetic model illustrated with S. aureus mastitis. Genetics Selection Evolution 37: 437453.
  • Donohue K. 2003. The influence of neighbor relatedness on multilevel selection in the Great Lakes sea rocket. American Naturalist 162: 7792.
  • Dutkowski GW, Potts BM. 2012. Genetic variation in the susceptibility of Eucalyptus globulus to drought damage. Tree Genetics and Genomes 8: 757773.
  • Eamus D. 2003. How does ecosystem water balance affect net primary productivity of woody ecosystems? Functional Plant Biology 30: 187205.
  • Ellen ED, Ducrocq V, Ducro BJ, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P. 2010. Genetic parameters for social effects on survival in cannibalistic layers: combining survival analysis and a linear animal model. Genetics Selection Evolution 42: 27.
  • Ellen ED, Muir WM, Teuscher F, Bijma P. 2007. Genetic improvement of traits affected by interactions among individuals: sib selection schemes. Genetics 176: 489499.
  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York, NY, USA: Longman Scientific and Technical.
  • File AL, Murphy GP, Dudley SA. 2012. Fitness consequences of plants growing with siblings: reconciling kin selection, niche partitioning and competitive ability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 279: 209218.
  • Forrester DI, Vanclay JK, Forrester RI. 2011. The balance between facilitation and competition in mixtures of Eucalyptus and Acacia changes as stands develop. Oecologia 166: 265272.
  • Frank SA. 2007. All of life is social. Current Biology 17: R648R650.
  • Freeman JS, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE. 2008. Few Mendelian genes underlie the quantitative response of a forest tree, Eucalyptus globulus, to a natural fungal epidemic. Genetics 178: 563571.
  • Galloway LF, Etterson JR, McGlothlin JW. 2009. Contribution of direct and maternal genetic effects to life-history evolution. New Phytologist 183: 826838.
  • Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Verbyla AP. 1997. Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 2: 269293.
  • Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R. 2009. ASReml User Guide. Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.
  • Griffing B. 1977 Selection for populations of interacting phenotypes. In: Pollak E, Kempthorne O, Bailey TB, eds. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press, 413434.
  • Griffing B. 1989. Genetic analysis of plant mixtures. Genetics 122: 943956.
  • Hadfield JD, Wilson AJ, Kruuk LEB. 2011. Cryptic evolution: does environmental deterioration have a genetic basis? Genetics 187: 10991113.
  • Hamilton WD. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior, Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 152.
  • Hardner CM, Potts BM, Gore PL. 1998. The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus parents. Evolution 52: 614618.
  • Hunter GC, Crous PW, Carnegie AJ, Wingfield MJ. 2009. Teratosphaeria nubilosa, a serious leaf disease pathogen of Eucalyptus spp. in native and introduced areas. Molecular Plant Pathology 10: 114.
  • John JA, Whitaker D, Williams ER. 1997. CycDesign. A package for the computer generation of experimental designs. Version 1.0. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO.
  • Jones TH, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM. 2007. Detection and visualization of spatial genetic structure in continuous Eucalyptus globulus forest. Molecular Ecology 16: 697707.
  • de Jong G, van Noordwijk AJ. 1992. Acquisition and allocation of resources: genetic (co)variances, selection, and life histories. American Naturalist 139: 749770.
  • Lipschutz-Powell D, Woolliams JA, Bijma P, Doeschl-Wilson AB. 2012. Indirect genetic effects and the spread of infectious disease: are we capturing the full heritable variation underlying disease prevalence? PLoS ONE 7: e39551.
  • Lively CM. 2010. The effect of host genetic diversity on disease spread. American Naturalist 175: E149E152.
  • Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998 Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • McGlothlin JW, Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED III. 2010. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64: 25582574.
  • Medzhitov R, Schneider DS, Soares MP. 2012. Disease tolerance as a defense strategy. Science 335: 936941.
  • Milgate AW, Potts BM, Joyce K, Mohammed C, Vaillancourt RE. 2005. Genetic variation in Eucalyptus globulus for susceptibility to Mycosphaerella nubilosa and its association with tree growth. Australasian Plant Pathology 34: 1118.
  • Mohammed C, Wardlaw T, Smith A, Pinkard E, Battaglia M, Glen M, Tommerup I, Potts B, Vaillancourt R. 2003. Mycosphaerella leaf diseases of temperate eucalypts around the southern pacific rim. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 33: 362372.
  • Moore AJ, Brodie ED III, Wolf JB. 1997. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. 1. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51: 13521362.
  • Muir WM. 1996. Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poultry Science 75: 447458.
  • Muir WM. 2005. Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs. Genetics 170: 12471259.
  • Mutic JJ, Wolf JB. 2007. Indirect genetic effects from ecological interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Ecology 16: 23712381.
  • Park RF. 1988. Epidemiology of Mycosphaerella nubilosa and M. cryptica on Eucalyptus spp. in south-eastern Australia. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 91: 261266.
  • Resende MDV, Stringer JK, Cullis BR, Thompson R. 2005. Joint modelling of competition and spatial variability in forest field trials. Brazilian Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 23: 722.
  • Roy BA, Kirchner JW. 2000. Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54: 5163.
  • Schwinning S, Weiner J. 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113: 447455.
  • Skabo S, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM. 1998. Fine-scale genetic structure of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus forest revealed by RAPDs. Australian Journal of Botany 46: 583594.
  • Stackpole DJ, Vaillancourt RE, Aguigar M, Potts BM. 2010. Age trends in genetic parameters for growth and wood density in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Genetics and Genomes 6: 179193.
  • Stram DO, Lee JW. 1994. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 11711177.
  • Stringer JK. 2006. Joint modelling of spatial variability and interplot competition to improve the efficiency of plant improvement. PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Stringer JK, Cullis BR, Thompson R. 2011. Joint modeling of spatial variability and within-row interplot competition to increase the efficiency of plant improvement. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 16: 269281.
  • Verbyla AP, Cullis BR, Kenward MG, Welham SJ. 1999. The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data using smoothing splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) 48: 269300.
  • Whitham TG, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Bangert RK, LeRoy CJ, Lonsdorf E, Allan GJ, DiFazio SP, Potts BM et al. 2006. A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics 7: 510523.
  • Wilson AJ, Gelin U, Perron M-C, Réale D. 2009. Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276: 533541.
  • Wilson AJ, Morrissey MB, Adams MJ, Walling CA, Guinness FE, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB. 2011. Indirect genetics effects and evolutionary constraint: an analysis of social dominance in red deer, Cervus elaphus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 772783.
  • Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC, Rice CW. 2006. Mycorrhizal-mediated phosphorus transfer between tallgrass prairie plants Sorghastrum nutans and Artemisia ludoviciana. Functional Ecology 20: 427435.
  • Wolf JB, Brodie ED III, Cheverud JM, Moore AJ, Wade MJ. 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 6469.
  • Wolf JB, Moore AJ. 2010 Interacting phenotypes and indirect genetic effects: a genetic perspective on the evolution of social behaviour. In: Westneat DF, Fox CW, eds. Evolutionary behavioral ecology. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Wolf JB, Mutic JJ, Kover PX. 2011. Functional genetics of intraspecific ecological interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 13581367.
  • Young JPW. 1981. Sib competition can favor sex in two ways. Journal of Theoretical Biology 88: 755756.