SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
nph12133-sup-0001-FigureS1.epsimage/eps2387KFig. S1 Strict consensus tree showing the relationships within Streptocarpus reconstructed from internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences obtained from Möller & Cronk (2001a,b), Hughes et al. (2005) and the current study.
nph12133-sup-0002-FigureS2.epsimage/eps1704KFig. S2 One of the shortest trees reconstructed from the Fitch parsimony analysis of the South Africa (SA) internal transcribed spacer (ITS) matrix and SA plastid matrix, respectively.
nph12133-sup-0003-FigureS3.epsimage/eps1289KFig. S3 One of the shortest trees reconstructed from the Fitch parsimony analysis of the reduced internal transcribed spacer (ITS) matrix and the reduced plastid matrix, respectively.
nph12133-sup-0004-FigureS4.epsimage/eps1111KFig. S4 One of the shortest trees reconstructed from the Fitch parsimony analysis of the reduced combined matrix.
nph12133-sup-0005-FigureS5.epsimage/eps1037KFig. S5 Fifty per cent majority-rule consensus tree reconstructed from the Bayesian analysis of the reduced combined matrix.
nph12133-sup-0006-FigureS6.epsimage/eps1802KFig. S6 One of the shortest trees reconstructed from the Fitch parsimony analysis of the combined + internal transcribed spacer (ITS) matrix and the combined + plastid matrix, respectively.
nph12133-sup-0007-TableS1.pdfapplication/PDF34KTable S1 Locality data for the South African samples included in the study