SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Airy Shaw HK. 1973. J. C. Willis's dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Asker S. 1970a. Apomictic biotypes in Potentilla intermedia and P. norvegica. Hereditas 66: 101108.
  • Asker S. 1970b. Apomixis and sexuality in the Potentilla argentea complex: 1. Crosses within other species. Hereditas 66: 127144.
  • Asker S. 1985. Polymorphism of Potentilla tabernaemontani and related taxa on Gotland. Hereditas 102: 3945.
  • Asker SE, Jerling L. 1992. Apomixis in plants. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
  • Barcaccia G, Arzenton F, Sharbel TF, Varotto S, Parrini P, Lucchin M. 2006. Genetic diversity and reproductive biology in ecotypes of the facultative apomict Hypericum perforatum L. Heredity 96: 322334.
  • Bate-Smith EC. 1961. Chromatography and taxonomy in the Rosaceae, with special reference to Potentilla and Prunus. Botanical Journal of the Linneaen Society 58: 3954.
  • Campbell CS, Greene CW, Berquist SE. 1987. Apomixis and sexuality in three species of Amelanchier, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). American Journal of Botany 74: 321328.
  • Campbell CS, Greene CW, Neubauer BF, Higgins JM. 1985. Apomixis in Amelanchier laevis, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). American Journal of Botany 72: 13971403.
  • Cavalier-Smith T. 1978. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. Journal of Cell Science 34: 247278.
  • Corner EJH. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons, vol 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crane CF. 2001. Classification of apomictic mechanisms. In: Savidan Y, Carman JG, Dresselhaus T, eds. The flowering of apomixis: from mechanisms to genetic engineering. Mexico City, Mexico: CIMMYT, IRD, European Commission DG VI (FAIR), 2443.
  • Czapik R. 1961. Embryological studies in the genus Potentilla L. I P. Crantzii. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica 4: 97119.
  • Czapik R. 1962. Badania embriologiczne nad rodzajem Potentilla L. II. P. arenaria. – Embryological studies in the genus Potentilla L. II. Potentilla arenaria. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica 5: 2942.
  • Czapik R. 1975. Apomixis in a sterile hybrid species of Potentilla. In: Walters SM, King CJ, eds. European floristic and taxonomic studies. Conference report. London, UK: Botanical Society of the British Isles/E.W. Classey Ltd, 3847.
  • Czapik R. 1983. The secondary nucleus in four species of the genus Rubus. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica 25: 179188.
  • Czapik R. 1985a. Apomictic embryo sacs in diploid Waldsteinia geoides WIELD. (Rosaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica 27: 2937.
  • Czapik R. 1985b. Secondary nucleus in Rosoideae. In: Willemse MTM, Went vanJL, eds. 8th International Symposium on sexual reproduction in seed plants, ferns and mosses. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Pudoc, 150152.
  • Czapik R. 1996. Problems of apomictic reproduction in the families Compositae and Rosaceae. Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 31: 381387.
  • Debes MA, Arias ME, Grellet-Bournonville CF, Wulff AF, Martínez-Zamora MG, Castagnaro AP, Díaz-Ricci JC. 2011. White-fruited Duchesnea indica (Rosaceae) is impaired in ANS gene expression. American Journal of Botany 98: 20772083.
  • Dickson EE, Arumuganathan K, Kresovich S, Doyle JJ. 1992. Nuclear DNA content variation within the Rosaceae. American Journal of Botany 79: 10811086.
  • Dobeš Ch. 1999. Die Karyogeographie des Potentilla verna agg. (Rosaceae) in Österreich – mit ergänzenden Angaben aus Slowenien, Kroatien, der Slowakei und Tschechien. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 101 B: 599629.
  • Dobeš Ch, Paule J. 2010. A comprehensive chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of the genus Potentilla (Rosaceae): implications for its geographic origin, phylogeography and generic circumscription. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56: 156175.
  • Dobeš Ch, Scherbantin A, Paule J, Striegel M, Kais B. 2012. IAPT/IOPB chromosome data. Taxon 61: E16E17.
  • Eriksen B, Fredrikson M. 2000. Megagametophyte development in Potentilla nivea (Rosaceae) from northern Swedish Lapland. American Journal of Botany 87: 642651.
  • Eriksson T, Donoghue MJ, Hibbs MS. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 211: 155179.
  • Eriksson T, Hibbs MS, Yoder AD, Delwiche CF, Donoghue MJ. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 197211.
  • Forenbacher A. 1914. Die Fortpflanzungsverhältnisse bei der Gattung Potentilla. Academie des Sciences et des Art Slaves du Sud de Zagreb 11: 8697; reviewed in Botanisches Centralblatt 1914, 125: 611–613.
  • Gentscheff GJ. 1938. Über die pseudogame Fortpflanzung bei Potentilla. Genetica 20: 398408.
  • Gentscheff GJ, Gustafsson Å. 1940. Parthenogenesis and pseudogamy in Potentilla. Botaniska Notiser 1940: 109132.
  • Goldblatt P. 1981. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975–1978. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 5: 1553.
  • Gregory TR. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biological Reviews 76: 65101.
  • Greilhuber J. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany (London) 95: 255260.
  • Gustafsson Å. 1947. Apomixis in higher plants. Part III. Biotype and species formation. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift NF Avd.2 43: 181320.
  • Håkansson A. 1946. Untersuchungen über die Embryologie einiger Potentilla-Formen. Lunds Universitets årsskrift NF Avd.2 42: 170.
  • Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.
  • Hjelmqvist H. 1962. The embryo sac development in some Cotoneaster species. Botaniska Notiser 115: 208236.
  • Hörandl E, Cosendai AC, Temsch EM. 2008. Understanding the geographic distributions of apomictic plants: a case for a pluralistic approach. Plant Ecology and Diversity 1: 309320.
  • Hörandl E, Dobeš Ch, Suda J, Vít P, Urfus T, Temsch EM, Cosendai AC, Wagner J, Ladinig U. 2011. Apomixis is not prevalent in subnival to nival plants of the European Alps. Annals of Botany (London) 108: 381390.
  • Jankun A, Kovanda M. 1988. Apomixis at the diploid level in Sorbus eximia (Embryological studies in Sorbus 3). Preslia 60: 193213.
  • Jedrzejczyk I, Sliwinska E. 2010. Leaves and seeds as materials for flow cytometric estimation of the genome size of 11 Rosaceae woody species containing DNA-staining inhibitors. Journal of Botany. doi:10.1155/2010/930895.
  • Kalkman C. 2004. Rosaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany & New York, NY, USA: Springer, 343386.
  • Krahulcová A, Rotreklová O. 2010. Use of flow cytometry in research on apomictic plants. Preslia 82: 2339.
  • Krahulcová A, Rotreklová O, Krahulec F, Rosenbaumová R, Plačamp;cgrave;ková I. 2009. Enriching ploidy level diversity: the role of apomictic and sexual biotypes of Hieracium subgen. Pilosella (Asteraceae) that coexist in polyploid populations. Folia Geobotanica 44: 281306.
  • Levin DA. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. American Naturalist 122: 125.
  • Löve Á. 1954. Cytotaxonomical remarks on some species of circumpolar taxa. Svensk botanisk tidskrift 48: 211233.
  • Martin AC. 1946. The comparative internal morphology of seeds. American Midland Naturalist 36: 513660.
  • Matzk F. 2007. Reproduction mode screening. In: Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J, eds. Flow cytometry in plant cells. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 131152.
  • Matzk F, Meister A, Schubert I. 2000. An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of monocots and dicots. Plant Journal 21: 97108.
  • Meirmans PG, Tienderen PH. 2004. GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 792794.
  • Moore RJ. 1970. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1968. Regnum Vegitabile 68: 1119.
  • Müntzing A. 1928. Pseudogamie in der Gattung Potentilla. Hereditas 11: 267283.
  • Müntzing A. 1931. Note on the cytology of some apomictic Potentilla-species. Hereditas 15: 166178.
  • Müntzing A. 1936. The evolutionary significance of autopolyploidy. Hereditas 21: 263378.
  • Müntzing A, Müntzing G. 1943. Spontaneous changes in chromosome number in apomictic Potentilla collina. Hereditas 29: 451460.
  • Müntzing A, Müntzing G. 1945. The mode of reproduction of hybrids between sexual and apomictic Potentilla argentea. Botaniska Notiser 1945: 4971.
  • Naruhashi N, Sugimoto M. 1996. The floral biology of Duchesnea (Rosaceae). Plant Species Biology 11: 173184.
  • Nosrati H, Price A, Wilcock CC. 2010. No evidence of apomixis in matroclinal progeny from experimental crosses in the genus Fragaria (strawberry) based on RAPDs. Euphytica 171: 193202.
  • Nyléhn J, Hamre E, Nordal I. 2003. Facultative apomixis and hybridization in arctic Potentilla section Niveae (Rosaceae) from Svalbard. Botanical Journal of the Linneaen Society 142: 373381.
  • Ontivero M, Arias M, Diaz Ricci J, Babot J, Albornoz P, Castagnaro A. 2000. Analysis of genetic similarities among species of Fragaria, Potentilla, and Duchesnea found in northwest Argentina by using morphological, anatomical, and molecular characters. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 547556.
  • Otto FJ. 1990. DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Crissman HA, Darzynkiewicz Z, eds. Methods in cell biology. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 105110.
  • Pan G, Zhou Y, Fowke LC, Wang H. 2004. An efficient method for flow cytometric analysis of pollen and detection of 2n nuclei in Brassica napus pollen. Plant Cell Reports 23: 196202.
  • Paule J, Scherbantin A, Dobeš Ch. 2012. Implications of hybridisation and cytotypic differentiation in speciation assessed by AFLP and plastid haplotypes – a case study of Potentilla alpicola La Soie. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12: 132.
  • Paule J, Sharbel TF, Dobeš Ch. 2011. Apomictic and sexual lineages of the Potentilla argentea L. group (Rosaceae): cytotype and molecular genetic differentiation. Taxon 60: 721732.
  • Rutishauser A. 1943. Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte pseudogamer Potentillen. Archiv der Julius Klaus-Stiftung für Vererbungsforschung 18: 687691.
  • Rutishauser A. 1945. Zur Embryologie amphimiktischer Potentillen. Berichte der Schweizer Botanischen Gesellschaft 55: 1932.
  • Rutishauser A. 1948. Pseudogamie und Polymorphie in der Gattung Potentilla. Archiv der Julius Klaus-Stiftung für Vererbungsforschung 23: 267424.
  • Rutishauser A. 1967. Fortpflanzungsmodus und Meiosis apomiktischer Blütenpflanzen. Protoplasmatologia 6: 1246.
  • Rutishauser A. 1969. Embryologie und Fortpflanzungsbiologie der Angiospermen. Eine Einführung. Wien, Austria & New York, NY, USA: Springer.
  • Schwendener J. 1969. Experimente zur Evolution von Potentilla procumbens Sibth. Berichte der Schweizer Botanischen Gesellschaft 79: 4992.
  • Smith GL. 1963a. Studies in Potentilla L. I. Embryological investigations into the mechanism of agamospermy in British P. tabernaemontani Aschers. New Phytologist 62: 264282.
  • Smith GL. 1963b. Studies in Potentilla L. II. Cytological aspects of apomixis in P. crantzii (Cr.) Beck ex Fritsch. New Phytologist 62: 283300.
  • Soják J. 2008. Notes on Potentila XXI. A new division of the tribe Potentilleae (Rosaceae) and notes on generic delimitations. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 127: 349358.
  • Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
  • Stehlik I, Kron P, Barrett SCH, Husband BC. 2007. Sexing pollen reveals female bias in a dioecious plant. New Phytologist 175: 185194.
  • Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávní ček P, Krahulec F. 2006. Ploidy level versus DNA ploidy level: an appeal for consistent terminology. Taxon 55: 447450.
  • Takamura T, Yoshimura N. 2007. Determination of ploidy levels in plants AMD pollen grains of Cyclamen persicum Mill. by using flow cytometry. Kagawa Daigaku Nogakubu Gakujutsu Hokoku 59: 4953.
  • Talent N, Dickinson TA. 2007. Endosperm formation in aposporous Crataegus (Rosaceae, Spiraeoideae, tribe Pyreae): parallels to Ranunculaceae and Poaceae. New Phytologist 173: 231249.
  • Tomczyk M, Pleszczynska M, Wiater A. 2010. Variation in total polyphenolics contents of aerial parts of Potentilla species and their anticariogenic activity. Molecules 15: 46394651.
  • Vinkenoog R, Bushell C, Spielman M, Adams S, Dickinson HG, Scott RJ. 2003. Genomic imprinting and endosperm development in flowering plants. Molecular Biotechnology 25: 149184.
  • Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M et al. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 44074414.
  • Wolf T. 1908. Monographie der Gattung Potentilla. Bibliotheca Botanica 16: 1715.