SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andalo C, Goldringer I, Godelle B. 2001. Inter- and intragenotypic competition under elevated carbon dioxide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 82: 157164.
  • Bailey JK, Wooley SC, Lindroth RL, Whitham TG. 2006. Importance of species interactions to community heritability: a genetic basis to trophic-level interactions. Ecology Letters 9: 7885.
  • Bangert RK. 2008. Genetic structure of a foundation species: scaling community phenotypes from the individual to the region. Heredity 100: 121131.
  • Bangert RK, Allan GJ, Turek RJ, Wimp GM, Meneses N, Martinsen GD, Keim P, Whitham TG. 2006. From genes to geography: a genetic similarity rule for arthropod community structure at multiple geographic scales. Molecular Ecology 15: 42154228.
  • Berrang P, Karnosky DF, Bennett JP. 1989. Natural selection for ozone tolerance in Populus tremuloides: field verification. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 519522.
  • Bussotti F. 2008. Functional leaf traits, plant communities, and acclimation processes in relation to oxidative stress in trees: a critical overview. Global Change Biology 14: 27272739.
  • Clark JS. 2005. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology Letters 8: 214.
  • Clark JS. 2007 Models for ecological data: an introduction. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Cole CT, Anderson JE, Lindroth RL, Waller DM. 2010. Rising concentrations of atmospheric CO2 have increased growth in natural stands of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). Global Change Biology 16: 21862197.
  • Curlin JW. 1967. Clonal differences in the yield response of Populus deltoides to nitrogen fertilization. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America31: 276280.
  • Darbah JNT, Kubiske ME, Nelson N, Oksanen E, Vaapavuori E, Karnosky DF. 2007. Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on paper birch (Betula papyrifera): reproductive fitness. The Scientific World Journal 7(Suppl 1): 240246.
  • Darbah JNT, Sharkey TD, Calfapietra C, Karnosky DF. 2009. Differential response of aspen and birch trees to heat stress under elevated carbon dioxide. Environmental Pollution 158: 10081014.
  • Dickinson NM, Turner AP, Lepp NW. 1991. How do trees and other long-lived plants survive in polluted environments? Functional Ecology 5: 511.
  • Dickson LL, Whitham TG. 1996. Genetically-based plant resistance traits affect arthropods, fungi, and birds. Oecologia 106: 400406.
  • Dickson RE, Lewin KF, Isebrands JG, Coleman MD, Heilman WE, Riemenschneider DE, Sober J, Host GE, Zak DR, Hendrey GR et al. 2000. Forest Atmosphere Carbon Transfer and Storage (FACTS-II) the Aspen Free-air CO2 and O3 Enrichment (FACE) project: an overview. In General Technical Report. North Central Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
  • Dodd ME, Silvertown J. 2000. Size-specific fecundity and the influence of lifetime size variation upon effective population size in Abies balsamea. Heredity 85: 604609.
  • Fagnano M, Merola G. 2007. Ozone and water stress: effects on the behavior of two white clover biotypes. Italian Journal of Agronomy 1: 312.
  • Farmer RE, Garlick K, Watson SR. 1988. Heritability and C effects in a 3-year old balsam poplar clonal test. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 10591062.
  • Fowler C, Cape JN, Coyle M, Flechard C, Kuylenstierna J, Hicks K, Derwent D, Johnson C, Stevenson D. 1999. The global exposure of forests to air pollutants. Water Air Soil Pollution 116: 532.
  • Gelfand AE, Ghosh SK. 1998. Model choice: a minimum posterior predictive loss approach. Biometrika 85: 111.
  • Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Lukac M, Wittig VE, De Angelis P, Janssens IA, Moscatelli MC, Grego S, Cotrufo MF, Godbold DL, et al. 2005. Net carbon storage in a poplar plantation (POPFACE) after three years of free-air CO2 enrichment. Tree Physiology 25: 13991408.
  • Gillespie JH. 2004 Population genetics; a concise guide. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Burczyk J, Nathan R, Nanos N, Gil L, Alia R. 2006. Effective gene dispersal and female reproductive success in Mediterranean maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton). Molecular Ecology 15: 45774588.
  • Haikio E, Freiwald V, Silfver T, Beuker E, Holopainen T, Oksanen E. 2009. Differences in leaf characteristics between ozone sensitive and tolerant hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × P. tremuloides) clones. Tree Physiology 29: 5366.
  • Haxeltine A, Prentice IC. 1996. BIOME3: an equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 4: 693709.
  • Heagle AS, McLaughlin MR, Miller JE, Joyner RL, Spruill SE. 1991. Adaptation of a white clover population to ozone stress. New Phytologist 119: 6168.
  • Hikosaka K, Yamano T, Nagashima H, Hirose T. 2003. Light-acquisition and use of individuals as influenced by elevated CO2 in even-aged monospecific stands of Chenopodium album. Functional Ecology 17: 786795.
  • Hirose T, Ackerly D, Traw MB, Ramseier D, Bazzaz FA. 1997. CO2 elevation, canopy photosynthesis, and optimal leaf area index. Ecology 78: 23392350.
  • Hwang SY, Lindroth RL. 1997. Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 111: 99108.
  • IPCC. 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, eds. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY, USA & Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Isebrands JG, McDonald EP, Kruger E, Hendrey G, Percy K, Pregitzer K, Sober J, Karnosky DF. 2001. Growth reponses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting elevated carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental Pollution 115: 359371.
  • Karnosky DF, Percy K, Mankovska B, Prichard T, Noormets A, Dickson RE, Jepson E, Isebrands JG. 2003 Ozone affects the fitness of trembling aspen. In: Karnosky DF, Percy K, Chappelka AH, Simpson C, Pikkarainen J, eds. Air pollution, global change, and forests in the new millennium. Boston, MA, USA: Elsevier, 199210.
  • Kobe RK, Coates KD. 1997. Models of sapling mortality as a function of growth to characterize interspecific variation in shade tolerance of eight tree species of northwestern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 227236.
  • Kontunen-Soppela S, Riikonen J, Ruhanen H, Brosche M, Somervuo P, Peltonen P, Kangasjarvi J, Auvinen P, Paulin L, Keinanen M, et al. 2010. Differential gene expression in senescing leaves of two silver birch genotypes in response to elevated CO2 and tropospheric ozone. Plant, Cell & Environment 33: 10161028.
  • Kozovits A, Matyssek R, Blaschke H, Gottlein A, Grams TE. 2005. Competition increasingly dominates the responsiveness of juvenile beech and spruce to elevated CO2 and/or O3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Global Change Biology 11: 13871401.
  • Kubiske ME, Quinn VS, Marquardt PE, Karnosky DF. 2007. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and/or O3 on intra- and interspecific competitive ability of aspen. Plant Biology 9: 342355.
  • LaDeau S, Clark JS. 2001. Rising CO2 levels and the fecundity of forest trees. Science 292: 9598.
  • LaDeau S, Clark JS. 2006a. Elevated CO2 and tree fecundity: the role of tree size, interannual variability, and population heterogeneity. Global Change Biology 12: 822833.
  • LaDeau S, Clark JS. 2006b. Pollen production by Pinus taeda growing in elevated atmospheric CO2. Functional Ecology 20: 541547.
  • Lee JC, Steiner KC, Zhang JW, Skelly JM. 2002. Heritability of ozone sensitivity in open-pollinated families of black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). Forest Science 48: 111117.
  • Lindroth RL, Kinney KK, Platz CL. 1993. Responses of deciduous trees to elevated atmospheric CO2: productivity, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Ecology 74: 763777.
  • Lindroth RL, Roth S, Nordheim EV. 2001. Genotypic variation in response of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Oecologia 126: 371379.
  • Luquez V, Hall D, Albrectsen BR, Karlsson J, Ingvarsson P, Jansson S. 2008. Natural phenological variation in aspen (Populus tremula): the SwAsp collection. Tree Genetics and Genomes 4: 279292.
  • Madritch M, Donaldson JR, Lindroth RL. 2006. Genetic identity of Populus tremuloides litter influences decomposition and nutrient release in a mixed forest stand. Ecosystems 9: 528537.
  • Madritch MD, Greene SL, Lindroth RL. 2009. Genetic mosaics of ecosystem functioning across aspen-dominated landscapes. Oecologia 160: 119127.
  • Mansfield JL, Curtis PS, Zak DR, Pregitzer K. 1999. Genotypic variation for condensed tannin production in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides, Salicaceae) under elevated CO2 and in high- and low-fertility soil. American Journal of Botany 86: 11541159.
  • van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Mutch LS, Johnson VG, Esperanza AM, Parsons DJ. 2003. Growth rate predicts mortality of Abies concolor in both burned and unburned stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33: 10291038.
  • Matyssek R, Wieser G, Nunna AJ, Kozovits AR, Reiter IM, Heerdt C, Winkler JB, Baumgarten M, Haberle KHH, Grams TEE, et al. 2004. Comparison between AOT40 and ozone uptake in forest trees of different species, age and site conditions. Atmospheric Environment 38: 22712281.
  • McDonald EP, Kruger EL, Riemenschneider DE, Isebrands JG. 2002. Competitive status influences tree-growth responses to elevated CO2 and O3 in aggrading aspen stands. Functional Ecology 16: 792801.
  • McIntyre PJ, Whitham TG. 2003. Plant genotype affects long-term herbivore population dynamics and extinction: conservation implications. Ecology 84: 311322.
  • Mitton JB, Grant MC. 1980. Observations on the ecology and evolution of quaking aspen, Populus tremuloides, in the Colorado Front Range. American Journal of Botany 67: 202209.
  • Mitton JB, Grant MC. 1996. Genetic variation and the natural history of quaking aspen. BioScience 46: 2531.
  • Moran EV, Clark JS. 2012. Variation in reproductive success in forest trees: its causes and consequences. Ecology 93: 10821094.
  • Nakamura I, Onoda Y, Matsushima N, Yokoyama J, Kawata M, Hikosaka K. 2011. Phenotypic and genetic differences in a perennial herb across a natural gradient of CO2 concentration. Oecologia 165: 809818.
  • Norby RJ, DeLucia EH, Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Giardina CP, King JS, Ledford J, McCarthy HR, Moore DJP, Ceulemans R, et al. 2005. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 1805218056.
  • Osier TL, Lindroth RL. 2004. Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry, and insect performance. Oecologia 139: 5565.
  • Paakkonen E, Holopainen T. 1995. Influence of nitrogen supply on the response of clones of birch (Betula pendula Roth) to ozone. New Phytologist 129: 595603.
  • Poorter H, Navas M-L. 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist 157: 175198.
  • Steinger T, Stephan A, Schmid B. 2007. Predicting adaptive evolution under elevated atmospheric CO2 in the perennial grass Bromus erectus. Global Change Biology 13: 10281139.
  • Thomas BR, MacDonald SE, Dancik BP. 1997. Variance components, heritabilities, and gain estimates for growth chamber and field performance of Populus tremuloides: growth parameters. Silvae Genetica 46: 317326.
  • Tuskan GA, DiFazio SP, Teichmann T. 2003. Poplar genomics is getting popular: the impact of the poplar genome project on tree research. Plant Biology 5: 13.
  • Uddling J, Teclaw RM, Kubiske ME, Pregitzer K, Ellsworth DS. 2008. Sap flux in pure aspen and mixed aspen–birch forests exposed to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiology 28: 12311243.
  • Wang X, Curtis PS, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR. 2000. Genotypic variation in physiological and growth responses of Populus tremuloides to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Tree Physiology 20: 10191028.
  • Ward JK, Antonovicks J, Thomas RB, Strain BR. 2000. Is atmospheric CO2 a selective agent on model C3 annuals? Oecologia 123: 330341.
  • Whitfield C, Davidson AW, Ashenden TW. 1997. Artificial selection and heritability of ozone resistance in two populations of Plantago major. New Phytologist 137: 645655.
  • Whitham TG, DiFazio SP, Schwitzer JA, Shuster SM, Allan GJ, Bailey JK, Woolbright SA. 2008. Extending genomics to natural communities and ecosystems. Science 320: 492495.
  • Wieneke S, Prati D, Brandl R, Stocklin J, Auge H. 2004. Genetic variation in Sanguisorba minor after 6 years in situ selection under elevated CO2. Global Change Biology 10: 13891401.
  • Wyckoff PH, Clark JS. 2002. The relationship between growth and mortality for seven co-occurring tree species in the southern Appalachian mountains. Journal of Ecology 90: 604615.
  • Ziska LH, Bunce JA. 2000. Sensitivity of field-grown soybean to future atmospheric CO2: selection for improved productivity in the 21st century. Functional Plant Biology 27: 979984.