1469-8137/asset/NPH_left.gif?v=1&s=08bb9ae88048d5716b3d3495e7b2fcfe48536ab2)
Full Paper
Can elevated CO2 and ozone shift the genetic composition of aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands?
Article first published online: 29 JAN 2013
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12153
© 2013 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2013 New Phytologist Trust
Additional Information
How to Cite
Moran, E. V. and Kubiske, M. E. (2013), Can elevated CO2 and ozone shift the genetic composition of aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands?. New Phytologist, 198: 466–475. doi: 10.1111/nph.12153
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 29 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 18 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Received: 26 NOV 2012
Funded by
- US Department of the Environment (DOE. Grant Number: DE-FG02-95ER62125
- US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service
- National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis
- National Science Foundation
- US Department of Homeland Security
- USDA. Grant Number: EF-0832858
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Supporting Information
- Cited By
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.
| Filename | Format | Size | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| nph12153-sup-0001-FigsS1-S3.docx | Word document | 335K | Fig. S1 Difference between mean height in each treatment and mean height under control conditions for all clones. Fig. S2 Mean annual height growth increment in meters for each aspen genotype in each treatment. Fig. S3 Predicted and actual numbers of each genotype under each treatment, using posterior means for model S8a. |
| nph12153-sup-0002-TablesS1-S6.docx | Word document | 32K | Table S1 Sample sizes of each aspen clone in each treatment Table S2 Parameters included in tested mortality models Table S3 Fit of all models, as measured by predictive loss Table S4 Parameter estimates for second (S14a), third (S5a) and fourth (S7b) best-fit models Table S5 Predicted mortality (best-fit model) of each clone under each treatment, with 95% credible intervals given equal initial numbers Table S6 Mean individual trunk volume for each clone and treatment in year 12 |
| nph12153-sup-0003-NotesS1.docx | Word document | 26K | Notes S1 Model description. |
| nph12153-sup-0004-NotesS2.docx | Word document | 88K | Notes S2 Justification of prior distributions, and sensitivity of results to changes in prior distributions. |
| nph12153-sup-0005-NotesS3.docx | Word document | 15K | Notes S3 Calculating selection differentials. |