SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
nph12230-sup-0001-FigS1-S3-Table S1-S3.docWord document299K

Fig. S1 Effect of the priors for fossil calibration and rate heterogeneity across branches on posterior estimates of divergence time.

Fig. S2 The posterior means of divergence time were plotted against the width of corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for each node.

Fig. S3 Relative rate or among-locus rate variation of 66 loci.

Table S1 Information on 106 loci used in the present study

Table S2 Posterior distributions of θ values for ancestral populations based on 66 loci using different prior means of θ of 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.05

Table S3 Posterior distributions of θ values for ancestral populations based on the reduced dataset without recombination signal using different priors mean of θ from 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03 to 0.05