Notice: Wiley Online Library will be unavailable on Saturday 27th February from 09:00-14:00 GMT / 04:00-09:00 EST / 17:00-22:00 SGT for essential maintenance. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Next-generation sequencing allows the identification of mutations responsible for mutant phenotypes by whole-genome resequencing and alignment to a reference genome. However, when the resequenced cultivar/line displays significant structural variation from the reference genome, mutations in the genome regions missing from the reference (gaps) cannot be identified by simple alignment.
Here we report on a method called ‘MutMap-Gap’, which involves delineating a candidate region harboring a mutation of interest using the recently reported MutMap method, followed by de novo assembly, alignment, and identification of the mutation within genome gaps.
We applied MutMap-Gap to isolate the blast resistant gene Pii from the rice cv Hitomebore using mutant lines that have lost Pii function.
MutMap-Gap should prove useful for cloning genes that exhibit significant structural variations such as disease resistance genes of the nucleotide-binding site-leucine rich repeat (NBS-LRR) class.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Developments in DNA sequencing technology have enabled whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of plant species to become routine. One of the applications of WGS is the identification of causative mutations responsible for mutant phenotypes of interest. For this purpose, a series of methods have been reported including SHOREmap (Schneeberger et al., 2009), NGM (Austin et al., 2011) and MutMap (Abe et al., 2012).
In MutMap (Abe et al., 2012), a recessive mutant with a phenotype of interest is crossed to the parental line used for the mutagenesis and DNA from multiple individuals of mutant F2 progeny are bulk-sequenced. The resulting short reads are aligned to the ‘reference sequence’ constructed for the parental line, and the result of this alignment is used to infer the genomic location of the causal mutation responsible for the phenotype. The prerequisite for MutMap is that the genomic fragment spanning the causative mutation is present in the parental ‘reference sequence’. However, this is not guaranteed, as the parental line ‘reference sequence’ is constructed based on the ‘reference genome’ of a representative cultivar/line of the species, for example the cv Nipponbare in rice (Oryza sativa) and the Col ecotype in Arabidopsis thaliana. This is done by resequencing the parental line genome and replacing nucleotides of the ‘reference genome’ with those of the parental line at all the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions detected between the two lines. Consequently, MutMap cannot identify mutations located within parental line-specific genomic regions (gaps) that are missing when compared with the ‘reference genome’. To identify mutations in such gap regions, we have introduced MutMap-Gap, a combination of MutMap and targeted de novo assembly of genomic gap regions.
Materials and Methods
Constructing the Hitomebore ‘reference sequence’ based on the Nipponbare ‘reference genome’
To generate the northern Japanese rice (Oryza sativa) cv Hitomebore parental line ‘reference sequence’, we aligned 12.25 Gb of Hitomebore wild-type (WT) parental line sequence reads obtained by Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) sequencing to the Nipponbare reference genome (build five genome sequence; http://rapdblegacy.dna.affrc.go.jp/download/index.html) by BWA (Li & Durbin, 2009) as described in Abe et al. (2012). The Hitomebore ‘reference sequence’ was constructed by replacing Nipponbare nucleotides with those of Hitomebore at the 124 968 SNP positions that were identified between the two cultivars.
WGS of bulked DNA from F2 progeny and MutMap analysis
DNA samples were prepared by bulking DNA extracted from leaves of mutant F2 individuals as described previously (Abe et al., 2012). The library for the Illumina GAIIx sequencer was prepared from 5 μg DNA samples. Short reads were aligned to the Hitomebore ‘reference sequence’ using BWA software (Li & Durbin, 2009). Alignment files were converted to SAM/BAM files using SAMtools (Li et al., 2009), and the aligned short reads were filtered by Coval (S. Kosugi et al., unpublished; http://sourceforge.net/projects/coval105/?source=directory) to improve SNP calling accuracy. The SNP index was calculated as described previously (Abe et al., 2012). Sliding window analysis was applied with a 4 Mb window size and a 10 kb increment. The details are given in the Supporting Information, Fig. S1.
De novo assembly
A mate-pair library of the Hitomebore WT genome for contig scaffolding was prepared using the Mate Pair Library Prep Kit (Illumina) and de novo assembly was performed with CLC (http://www.clcbio.com) software. The generated contigs were used to generate scaffolds using mate-pair sequence reads of Hitomebore WT DNA with SSPACE (Boetzer et al., 2011).
Using a total of 3033 Hitomebore mutant lines generated by ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis, we carried out a spray inoculation test with the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae isolate TH68-126 (race 033.1) carrying AVR-Pii (Yoshida et al., 2009) and incompatible with Hitomebore (with Pii).
The principle of MutMap-Gap
MutMap-Gap is a WGS-based method developed for the identification of the causative nucleotide change for a given mutant phenotype in a genomic region that is missing from the reference genome. MutMap-Gap combines the previously reported MutMap method (Abe et al., 2012) with targeted gap filling by de novo assembly. This is followed by identification of the causative mutation responsible for the phenotype in the assembled gap region as described in Figs 1 and 2 using rice as an example.
First, mutant lines are developed by mutagenesis of the parental cv ‘P’ with a chemical mutagen such as EMS. Given that cv P is different from the cv Ref for which an accurate genome sequence is available, we first need to generate a ‘reference sequence’ of the P genome. For this purpose, we sequence the cv P and align the resulting reads to the Ref genome, which is the publicly available reference sequence. Following this step, nucleotides of the Ref genome are replaced with those from the P genome at all SNP positions identified between the two cultivars (Fig. 1a). Although the majority of sequence reads obtained for P are expected to be aligned to the Ref genome, the short reads derived from a P-specific genomic region cannot be aligned, and thus are collected as unmapped reads.
Assume that we are interested in a mutant line ‘M’ generated in the cv P background, and that the causal mutation for the phenotype under consideration resides in a P-specific genomic region (Fig. 1b). As the genomic region containing the causal mutation is not represented in the P ‘reference sequence’, simply aligning the ‘M’ sequence reads to the P ‘reference sequence’ cannot identify it. However, we can recover such a P-specific genomic region by de novo assembly. To this end, we first delineate the approximate position of the causative mutation by MutMap. Briefly, ‘M’ is backcrossed to P to generate F2 progeny, and DNA from c. 20 mutant F2 individuals are bulked and subjected to whole-genome resequencing. The resulting short reads are aligned to the cv P ‘reference sequence’ (Fig. 1b) to identify SNPs. For each SNP position, the SNP index, the ratio of mutant-type short reads to the total short reads covering a particular SNP position, is calculated and SNP index plots are generated to show the relationship between the SNP index and chromosomal position graphically. The SNPs in the candidate region close to the causal mutation are expected to have a higher SNP index (SNP index ~ 1), whereas those in unlinked regions show a SNP index of c. 0.5. Finding a peak in the SNP index allows the identification of the approximate genomic interval harboring the causal mutation. However, as our candidate interval is located within the gap region, it is not possible to identify the causal mutation by MutMap alone (Fig. 1c).
To target a mutation located in the gap region, we apply de novo assembly to reconstruct the P ‘reference sequence’ within the target interval delineated by the initial MutMap step (Fig. 2). For de novo assembly, we utilize two types of sequence reads derived from the cv P: sequence reads aligned to the target interval region as delineated by MutMap; and sequence reads that could not be aligned (unmapped) to the Ref genome (Fig. 2a). Using these two types of reads, we perform de novo assembly using CLC (http://www.clcbio.com), and SSPACE (Boetzer et al., 2011) software to recover scaffolds presumably located in the target interval (Fig. 2a).
Finally, the short reads derived from the bulked DNA of F2 plants showing a mutant phenotype are aligned to the combined sequences of the scaffolds produced by the de novo assembly and P ‘reference sequence’ (Fig. 2b). This procedure allows the identification of SNPs residing within the newly generated scaffolds, for which the SNP index is calculated. The SNPs showing an SNP index of 1 are the likely candidates for the causative mutation for the mutant phenotype. The novelty of MutMap-Gap resides in the targeted de novo assembly of the genomic region corresponding to the gap in the Ref genome sequence, as delineated by MutMap, and identification of the causal mutation in the assembled sequence by SNP index analysis.
MutMap-Gap identifies rice Pii, a blast resistance gene
As a proof of principle, we applied MutMap-Gap in the identification of the rice blast (M. oryzae) resistance (R-) gene Pii. Rice blast is a destructive and widespread disease caused by an ascomycete pathogen M. oryzae and accounts for significant yield losses worldwide. For efficient marker-assisted breeding of rice blast resistance, the identification of R genes is important. Pii confers resistance to rice against the blast pathogen harboring the corresponding AVR-Pii gene. The complete genome sequence of the rice ssp. japonica cv Nipponbare was published in 2005 (International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, 2005). However, Nipponbare is known to lack Pii, indicating that this cultivar cannot be directly used for cloning of the Pii gene.
To isolate Pii, we used the ‘Hitomebore’ cultivar containing the Pii gene. Whole-genome resequencing of Hitomebore allowed us to construct a Hitomebore ‘reference sequence’ based on the Nipponbare genome sequence by replacing Nipponbare nucleotides with those of Hitomebore at all the SNP positions (124 968 positions) identified between these two cultivars (see the 'Materials and Methods' section). Of the 389 Mb Nipponbare genome, c. 358 Mb (92%) was covered by the 10.71 Gb Hitomebore sequence reads generated, corresponding on average to ×27.5 coverage (Table S1). We found short reads amounting to a total of 251 Mb that were unmapped to the Nipponbare reference genome sequence. These short reads are probably derived from Hitomebore-specific genomic regions that are not represented in the Nipponbare genome.
For identification of Hitomebore mutants that had lost Pii function, we carried out a spray inoculation test using an incompatible blast race 033.1 expressing AVR-Pii (Yoshida et al., 2009) on a total of 3033 EMS-mutagenized Hitomebore lines (Fig. 3a). We identified two independent Pii-deficient candidate mutants, Hit5948 and Hit6780, which showed susceptible phenotypes following inoculation with race 033.1 (Fig. 3b). For mapping the causal mutations by MutMap, we independently crossed the two mutants to Hitomebore WT and generated two sets of F2 progeny. The Hit5948 × WT F2 progeny segregated 61 WT to 17 mutant phenotypes, whereas the Hit6780 × WT F2 progeny segregated 88 WT to 24 mutant phenotypes. In both cases, the segregation conformed to a 3 : 1 ratio (χ2 = 0.43, ns for Hit5948 × WT F2; χ2 = 0.76, ns for Hit6780 × WT F2), indicating that the phenotypes of the two mutants were caused by single recessive mutations (Fig. 3c).
For MutMap analysis, we bulked the DNA of the mutant F2 progeny (17 individuals for Hit5984 and 24 individuals for Hit6780) and undertook WGS. We carried out 75 bp paired-end sequencing and obtained 2.45 and 2.87 Gbp sequence reads for DNA samples from Hit5948 and Hit6780 mutant F2 bulks, respectively (Table S1). The sequence reads were aligned to the Hitomebore ‘reference sequence’ and SNPs were identified. For all SNP positions, the SNP index was calculated and graphs relating SNP position and SNP index were generated for further analysis (Figs 3d, S2).
MutMap applied to Hit5948 revealed an SNP index peak in the genomic interval from 7.88 to 11.98 Mb on chromosome 9. Of the four SNPs with an SNP index of 1 identified in the candidate region, SNP-10290916 was localized in the second exon of the gene Os09t0327600-01 predicted in the Nipponbare genome (Table S2). This SNP represented a nonsense mutation, causing an amino acid change from Trp (TGG) to a stop codon (TGA) at the 226th-amino-acid residue. Os09t0327600-01 encodes a protein with a nucleotide binding site and leucine rich repeat (NBS-LRR) domain, both of which are conserved in plant resistance genes (Zhou et al., 2004; Jones & Dangl, 2006). Scrutiny of Os09t0327600-01 from Nipponbare showed that this gene encodes a truncated R-protein that is likely to be nonfunctional. We therefore hypothesize that the Os09t0327600-01 homolog in Hitomebore functions as Pii and that Nipponbare lacks a functional Pii.
A similar analysis applied to Hit6780 using MutMap identified a candidate genomic region that is probably harboring the causative mutation in the interval from 7.18 to 13.05 Mb on chromosome 9, an identical region to that in which the causal mutation of Hit5948 was mapped. Although 10 SNPs with an SNP index of 1 were identified in the region, none represented nonsynonymous mutations and no SNP was detected in Os09t0327600-01, the candidate gene for Hit5948 (Table S3). We hypothesized that the causative mutation of Hit6780 is located in the Hitomebore-specific genomic region (Fig. 4a).
To identify the causative mutation of Hit6780, we applied MutMap-Gap analysis. We retrieved all of the Hitomebore sequence reads (4849 550 reads) mapped to the 7.18–13.05 Mb region on chromosome 9 and combined them with the Hitomebore sequence reads (3358 005 reads) unmapped to the Nipponbare genome. These combined short reads were used for de novo assembly with CLC software (http://www.clcbio.com) and generated a total of 2239 contigs that were over 1 kb in size. For scaffolding of the contigs with SSPACE (Boetzer et al., 2011) software, c. 46 989 929 mate-pair short reads were used, generating c. 852 scaffolds with a minimum size of 1 kb (Fig. S3). The scaffolds were then combined with the Hitomebore ‘reference sequence’ and used as a reference for aligning the short reads derived from bulked DNA of Hit6780 F2 plants, as would be done in MutMap analysis. Of the 852 scaffolds generated, only two harbored SNPs with an SNP index of 1. Gene prediction by GENSCAN (http://genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html) using the two scaffolds revealed that one of the SNPs corresponded to an intergenic region, and the other, in scaffold no. 7 (length = 63 355 bp), was localized within the splicing junction of a gene we tentatively named HIT7 (Fig. S4). This mutation is predicted to cause mis-spliced mRNA and to introduce a premature stop codon (Fig. S4). The HIT7 gene contains an NBS-LRR domain, suggesting that this SNP is the likely causal mutation of Hit6780.
We compared the DNA sequence of HIT7 with that of Os09t0327600-01 and found a high similarity (nucleotide identity 97.3%) in the region where the candidate SNP of Hit5948 was detected (Fig. 4). Accordingly, we concluded that the causative mutations of Hit5948 and Hit6780 are located within the same gene. Conventional MutMap analysis could detect the Hit5984 mutation, which was localized in the region where sequence similarity was very high between HIT7 of Hitomebore and Os09t0327600-01 of Nipponbare, but not the causal SNP of Hit6780. The Nipponbare Os09t0327600-01 gene seems to have lost R-gene function by truncation of the region corresponding to the C-terminus of the protein (Fig. 4).
To confirm whether the susceptible phenotype of Hit5948 and Hit6780 was caused by mutations in the same gene, we carried out an allelism test by crossing Hit5948 with Hit6780. As expected, the phenotypes of F1 plants heterozygous for the Hit5948 and Hit6780 mutations (Fig. 5a) were susceptible to the M. oryzae isolate TH68-126 (race 033.1; Fig. 5b), confirming that the phenotypes of Hit5984 and Hit6780 mutants are caused by defects in the same gene, HIT7. We further tested the association between the phenotype in the presence or absence of Pii and cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) marker polymorphism discriminating HIT7 and Os09t0327600-01 alleles in a total of 30 rice cultivars. A complete association was observed between the Pii phenotypes and the CAPS patterns, supporting the identification of the Pii gene as HIT7 (Fig. S5). We accordingly renamed HIT7 as Pii.
The Pii gene is composed of five exons, and the 3078 bp coding sequence spanning the start and stop codons encodes a 1025-amino-acid protein predicted as a putative NBS-LRR type R protein (Fig. S6), which is typical of the majority of disease resistance genes in plants (Belkhadir et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2004; McHale et al., 2006).
Successful identification of a causative nucleotide change responsible for a mutant phenotype by WGS depends on the availability of a good reference genome sequence. If the resequenced mutant belongs to a cultivar/line that is structurally different from the one used for constructing the reference genome, it is possible that the causative mutation may reside in the genomic region specific to the resequenced cultivar, but absent from reference genome. In the past, such regions have been addressed by generating a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of the cultivar/line used for the mutant screen, followed by screening of the BAC clones by DNA probes tightly linked to the target region and by sequencing of these clones. This procedure remains laborious and time-consuming. MutMap-Gap, as presented here, circumvents this process, and offers a fast, alternative approach to obtaining sequence information for a genomic region of interest that is missing from the reference genome.
For effective marker-assisted breeding of crop resistance against pathogens, the identification of R genes is important. R genes, which mostly encode the NBS-LRR class of proteins, have a unique mode of evolution and represent a highly divergent group in plants (Clark et al., 2007). The successful identification of the rice blast resistant Pii gene from Hitomebore demonstrates the utility of MutMap-Gap for R-gene isolation. How large the genetic distance between the line used for the ‘reference genome’ and the parental line containing the mutation could be for MutMap-Gap to remain effective awaits future evaluation. We envisage that this method, among others, will broaden the application of WGS in isolating novel plant genes by quick forward genetics approaches.
This study was supported by the Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences (PROBRAIN), the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan, and the Ministry of Education, Cultures, Sports and Technology, Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 23113009 to H.S. and R.T.) and by JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. 24248004 to R.T.). We thank Shigeru Kuroda for general support and Matthew J. Terry for comments on the manuscript.