SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Please note: Wiley Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
nph12433-sup-0001-FigS1.docxWord document245KFig. S1 Performance of GTP_Pp on different test data sets.
nph12433-sup-0002-TableS1.xlsxapplication/msexcel75KTable S1 Training and test data set for ATP2; area under ROC curve
nph12433-sup-0003-TableS2.xlsapplication/msexcel63KTable S2 Training and test data set sorted according to method of origin for GTP_Pp
nph12433-sup-0004-TableS3.xlsapplication/msexcel43KTable S3 List of all tested features; Top-15 N- and C- terminal feature list used by the two GTP versions
nph12433-sup-0005-TableS4.xlsapplication/msexcel27KTable S4 Sequences of primers used for cloning
nph12433-sup-0006-TableS5.xlsapplication/msexcel29KTable S5 Comparison of the performance of three prediction tools used for creating the mitochondrial data set with a reduced mitochondrial protein test data set from P. patens
nph12433-sup-0007-TableS6.docxWord document21KTable S6 Summary of localization results on the in vivo test set
nph12433-sup-0008-MethodsS1_NotesS1.docxWord document32K

Methods S1 Details on the two prediction tools, ATP2 and GTP.

Notes S1 Details on the two prediction tools, ATP2 and GTP.