SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • extinction;
  • megafauna;
  • palaeoecology;
  • plant–herbivore interactions;
  • pollen analysis;
  • Quaternary;
  • Sporormiella

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

As a result of the late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions (50 000–10 000 before present (BP)), most continents today are depauperate of megaherbivores. These extinctions were time-transgressive, size- and taxonomically selective, and were caused by climate change, human hunting, or both. The surviving megaherbivores often act as ecological keystones, which was likely true in the past. In spite of this and extensive research on the causes of the Late Quaternary Extinctions, the long-term ecological consequences of the loss of the Pleistocene megafauna remained unknown until recently, due to difficulties in linking changes in flora and fauna in paleorecords. The quantification of Sporormiella and other dung fungi have recently allowed for explicit tests of the ecological consequences of megafaunal extirpations in the fossil pollen record. In this paper, I review the impacts of the loss of keystone megaherbivores on vegetation in several paleorecords. A growing number of studies support the hypothesis that the loss of the Pleistocene megafauna resulted in cascading effects on plant community composition, vegetation structure and ecosystem function, including increased fire activity, novel communities and shifts in biomes. Holocene biota thus exist outside the broader evolutionary context of the Cenozoic, and the Late Quaternary Extinctions represent a regime shift for surviving plant and animal species.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

Following the widespread loss of megafauna during the Late Quaternary Extinctions (LQEs; 50 000–10 000 before present (BP) on continents), modern biomes are depauperate of large herbivores relative to their evolutionary history (Koch & Barnosky, 2006). The surviving megaherbivores (see Box 1 for definitions), such as elephants, are often considered as ecological keystones for their well-documented impacts on plant community composition, structure and function (Owen-Smith, 1988); Pleistocene megafauna likely played similar roles in ice age ecosystems (Johnson, 2009). Herbivores have influenced the evolution of plant morphology and diversity, including the development of grasslands in the Miocene and the evolution of thorns, large fruits and chemical defenses (Crawley, 1983). While the role of megaherbivory has been recognized at both historic and geologic timescales, there have been comparatively few studies of the influence of large browsers and grazers on vegetation during the Quaternary (the last 2.5 million yr) in general, and the ecological consequences of the LQEs in particular. At Quaternary timescales (e.g. millennia), climate change has long been considered the predominant driver of vegetation change. Testing this assumption has been challenging, in large part because linking cause and effect in paleorecords has been hampered by the discontinuity of the vertebrate bone record in space and time, as well as the fact that animal remains are not typically found in the same depositional environments that preserve pollen, a proxy for paleovegetation change. Recently, several studies have used spores from Sporormiella and other coprophilous fungi to test the effects of the extinction of megaherbivores on vegetation dynamics during the late Quaternary (Burney et al., 2003; Robinson et al., 2005; Gill et al., 2009, 2012; Rule et al., 2012; Table 1). Unlike the vertebrate bone record, coprophilous fungi preserved in lake and mire sediments allow direct study of changes in local vegetation and megaherbivory pressure in tandem. This growing body of research indicates not only that the local timing of megafaunal collapse is detectable in paleorecords, but also that the consequences of the LQEs include widespread ecological upheaval, biome reorganization (including novel communities) and changes in landscape fire regimes.

Table 1. Case studies of the effects of extinct Pleistocene megaherbivores
Case studyRegionExtinction consequences
Burney et al. (2003)MadagascarIncreased fire activity
Robinson et al. (2005)Upstate New York, USAIncreased fire activity, altered forest composition
Gill et al. (2009)Indiana, USANovel plant associations, increased fire activity, altered forest composition
Gill et al. (2012)Ohio, USANovel plant associations, increased fire activity, altered forest composition
Rule et al. (2012)AustraliaIncreased fire activity, biome shift
Doughty et al. (2013)GlobalDisruptions to terrestrial biogeochemistry

Box 1. A note about definitions

Megafauna’ (from the ancient Greek for megas ‘large’ and the New Latin fauna ‘animal’) has varied usage among scientists. The most common thresholds in the literature for modern herbivores are 44 or 100 kg; however, Owen-Smith (1987) uses 1000 kg specifically in the discussion of extinct Pleistocene megaherbivores, which is a size class that includes no extant taxa in North or South America, Eurasia or Australia. In this review, I use the 100 kg cutoff when referencing megafauna or megaherbivores, thus including important extant taxa such as the Cervidae and American bison (Bison bison) which have well-documented influences on vegetation. Keystone species are taxa that exert a disproportionately high influence on their habitats relative to their biomass; a guild is a group of species that exploit the same resources.

Modern megaherbivore ecology

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

Modern megaherbivores have been shown to influence plant community composition, vegetation structure and openness, seed dispersal, rates and patterns of nutrient cycling, and fire regimes (see Supporting Information Table S1 for a select list of examples). Relative to smaller herbivores, megaherbivores exert disproportionate influences on vegetation relative to their biomass, because they (1) have long gut retention times, and are thus able to consume lower quality vegetation and woody material, (2) consume a greater relative fraction of landscape plant biomass, (3) are typically more general in their foraging habits, (4) exploit resources at broader spatial scales, and (5) are able to escape predation to the point where they may achieve sufficiently large populations to affect vegetation (Owen-Smith, 1988). As megaherbivores experience a wide range of seasonal, climatic and spatial heterogeneity of resource availability due to interannual variability in moisture, temperature or both (Illius, 2006), populations may migrate to track optimal forage, micronutrients, water or reproductive habitats. Plants may therefore experience a wide spatiotemporal range in herbivory pressure, which can promote landscape heterogeneity (e.g. tree–grass coexistence in savannas; Sankaran et al., 2005). The effects of herbivory depend in part on the material consumed (e.g. leaves, seeds or meristems), and may be positive (e.g. dispersal) or negative (e.g. mortality), as well as direct (e.g. inducible defenses) or indirect (e.g. altered competition for resources; Hester et al., 2006). In the absence of empirical tests or direct observation, modern megaherbivores provide an important source of inference to link pattern and process in paleoecological records (Table S1).

The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

During the Pleistocene, megaherbivores were more diverse and widespread than today on all continents. By the early Holocene (c. 11 700 kyr BP), however, hundreds of species of large herbivores and their predators had disappeared from the continents as part of a global, time-transgressive extinction wave (Koch & Barnosky, 2006). The LQEs were more selective than any event in the preceding 65 million yr of mammalian evolutionary history, disproportionately targeting large mammals (> 10 kg). Causal debates have centered on natural vs anthropogenic mechanisms, including direct and indirect effects of climate change, rapid or protracted human overkill, or some combination of these (Koch & Barnosky, 2006). Determining a cause of the extinctions has been hampered by the fact that fossil faunal remains are discontinuous in space and time, and that the extinctions were contemporaneous with environmental change and human arrival, particularly in the Americas. Increasingly, interdisciplinary approaches and improved dating and analytical methods suggest that a combination of environmental stress and human hunting pressure contributed to the extinction of most species of megafauna (Lorenzen et al., 2011).

Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

While extensive efforts have been devoted to understanding the causes of the LQEs, the ecological consequences of those extinctions have received much less attention. This is due in part to the fact that the fossil faunal and vegetation records have different special and temporal coverage, depositional environments and dating uncertainties, and so establishing a precise order of events (e.g. population collapse followed by vegetation change) has been problematic. Recently, several studies have quantified spores of Sporormiella and other coprophilous fungi to establish the timing and environmental context of local megafaunal population collapse (Burney et al., 2003; Robinson et al., 2005; Gill et al., 2009, 2012; Rule et al., 2012).

Fungal spores may be preserved in lakes and mires along with pollen; this makes Sporormiella particularly useful in paleoecology because, unlike the vertebrate bone record, it allows for the direct interpretation of pollen-based paleovegetation records in the context of herbivores. While there are many coprophilous fungi, Sporormiella spores have a distinct morphology (i.e. they may be identified to genus) and are obligately coprophilous, reproducing only in herbivore dung (though other coprophilous fungi can augment the record; see Baker et al., 2013). Sporormiella and other spores are found in association with the dung of a wide range of extant fauna, including megaherbivores (e.g. bison, cattle, horse, moose, elephants) and smaller mammals and birds (e.g. rabbits, geese, porcupines; Richardson, 2001). In North American records, Sporormiella spores are present (> 2% of the upland pollen sum) in Pleistocene-age sediments, rare in Holocene sediments, and increase in abundance following the historic introduction of domestic grazers (Davis, 1987). While some species of megafauna survived the LQEs (e.g. Bison, Alces), the low abundances of Sporormiella in Holocene sediments is assumed to be because megafaunal biomass was insufficient to produce the volumes of dung necessary to generate a signal in sediment records. Gill et al. (2013) linked Sporormiella abundance to grazing intensity of bison in a modern tallgrass prairie, establishing a local source area (< 100 m) for spores, and showed that Sporormiella was suitable to detect a megafaunal presence despite a background level produced by small mammals (e.g. hares). Sporormiella cannot be identified to species or linked to specific megafaunal hosts (Feranec et al., 2011), and so should be considered a proxy for functional extinction or population collapse (Gill et al., 2009).

Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

Given the documented effects of modern megaherbivores on contemporary plant communities, it has been hypothesized that ancient landscapes were similarly influenced (Craine & McLauchlan, 2004; Johnson, 2009). To date, Quaternary vegetation dynamics were thought to have been primarily driven by climate change, although the wealth of modern data on megaherbivore influences on vegetation allow for the formulation of several predictions about the long-term ecological consequences of megafaunal extirpations in the paleorecord. Herbivores influence the physiology, form and growth of plants, and the paleorecord may not capture the full range of the effects of plant–herbivore interactions. Some effects, such as the influences of herbivory on species coexistence and competition, may only be inferred as a potential mechanism driving changes in community composition, although such inferences may be grounded with modern studies to identify mechanistic linkages between pattern and process. For this review, I have limited discussion to those effects that may be most readily observed in or inferred from paleorecords, using current and emerging methods. Additionally, while this review focuses on the ecological effects of the Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions, megaherbivore extirpations may also have influenced climate change, both directly (e.g. influencing atmospheric methane compositions; Smith et al., 2010) or indirectly via changes to vegetation (e.g. albedo).

Community composition may have been altered by the release of plants from herbivory following the LQEs

Several pollen and Sporormiella records from eastern North America show an increase in hardwood deciduous taxa immediately following the decline in dung fungal spores, including an increase in Fraxinus nigra-type and Ostrya-type pollen at Appleman Lake, Indiana (Gill et al., 2009) and Silver Lake, Ohio (Gill et al., 2012), and an increase in Acer in New York (Robinson et al., 2005). At Appleman and Silver Lakes, pollen assemblages immediately following the local collapse of megaherbivores were highly dissimilar to present, indicating the widespread formation of plant associations without a modern analogue (Fig. 1). These novel communities were likely triggered by a combination of novel climates and herbivory release. Additionally, pollen and Sporormiella records from Australia (Rule et al., 2012) during the penultimate glaciation and from late-Holocene Madagascar (Burney et al., 2003) record major shifts in community composition immediately following the decline in megafauna in the absence of climate change, indicating that the loss of herbivores alone was sufficient to drive major shifts in vegetation. Indeed, in Australia, the changes from rainforest to sclerophyll vegetation following local megafaunal collapse were more dramatic than those driven by glacial–interglacial transitions (Rule et al., 2012).

image

Figure 1. Simplified pollen diagrams from Appleman Lake, Indiana, USA (a) and Silver Lake, Ohio, USA (b), including conifers (green), deciduous taxa (orange), and the dung fungus Sporormiella (blue), a proxy for megaherbivore presence. Pollen data are represented as a portion of the upland pollen sum; Sporormiella (blue bars) abundances are represented as a portion of the upland pollen sum but are not included in that sum. Squared-chord distance (SCD; black line) is a measure of minimum dissimilarity between fossil pollen assemblages and all possible modern matches; values > 0.3 (indicated by the dotted grey line) are assemblages considered to have no modern analog. Charcoal data are represented as charcoal accumulation rates (CHAR; solid red); the background component of charcoal is indicated by the red line; individual fire events are peaks above background. The figure is modified from Gill et al. (2009, 2012). (c) An ascospore of four Sporormiella spore cells; spore cells are typically detached in the fossil record.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Holocene fire regimes may be enhanced relative to the Pleistocene, due to a build-up of landscape fuels

Fire is considered the primary form of (abiotic) consumer control of vegetation today (Bond et al., 2005), but this may not have been the case during the Pleistocene, when megaherbivores were more widespread (Flannery, 1994). Joint analyses of fossil charcoal and Sporormiella records indicate that LQEs may have increased fire activity in Madagascar (Burney et al., 2003), North America (Robinson et al., 2005; Gill et al., 2009, 2012; see Fig. 2), and Australia (Rule et al., 2012). Megafaunal herbivory likely reduced litter and fuel loads during the Pleistocene, as has been observed in modern systems (Bond & Keeley, 2005); following the LQEs, increased fuel loads and a reduction in landscape heterogeneity would likely have facilitated the spread of fires. If fire frequency, severity and geographic extent were greater during the Holocene following the loss of herbivores, then Holocene fire regimes (as indicated by fossil charcoal analysis) should differ from previous interglacials. Global charcoal records do indicate that fire was less frequent during the last glacial period than in the Holocene (Daniau et al., 2012), although interactions between climate, megaherbivory and fire will complicate future causal inferences.

image

Figure 2. An updated, integrative conceptual model of drivers of vegetation dynamics on Quaternary timescales. Line thickness indicates the hypothesized relative strength of each coupling; dashed lines indicate interactions that are poorly understood in the paleorecord. Adapted from Gill et al. (2012).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Pleistocene ecosystems may have been more open and/or patchy than present

Given the role that megaherbivores play in maintaining tree–grass coexistence today (Sankaran et al., 2005), the end-Pleistocene extinctions may have reduced vegetation openness and decreased landscape heterogeneity in some biomes. Vera (2000) suggested that the early Holocene mosaics of grassland, thicket and forest in prehistoric central Europe were maintained by large herbivores, and that the closing of those forests in the mid- to late Holocene were the result of the extinction or extirpation of those species of megafauna that had survived the LQEs, including Bos primigenius, Alces alces and Bison bonasus. In the absence of herbivores, light-demanding woody taxa, including Quercus and Corylus, were out-competed by shade-tolerant Fagus, Ulmus, Carpinus, Tilia and Ostrya. The Vera Hypothesis has been highly contested: Mitchell (2005) compared pollen records from Europe with Ireland, which lacked mid-Holocene megafauna, and found that Corylus and Quercus were abundant even in the absence of browsers. However, fossil beetle evidence indicate that some regions of early Holocene Europe were more open than present, particularly in the lowlands, which is presumably due to both herbivory and (possibly anthropogenic) fire (Svenning, 2002). Thus, the Vera Hypothesis may in fact be more applicable to pre-Holocene landscapes (when the very largest megaherbivores were more widespread) than the current interglacial epoch.

Graham & Lundelius (1984) hypothesized that a shift from mosaic to zonal vegetation gradients was a primary cause of the megafaunal extinctions in North America, but in modern studies, megaherbivores have been found to maintain landscape heterogeneity (Table 1). Therefore, closing landscapes and the development of more continuous vegetation may have been a consequence, rather than a cause, of the end-Pleistocene extinctions. Bakker et al. (2004) tested whether modern European thorny and light-demanding taxa, including Quercus robur and Prunus spinosa were ecological anachronisms, adapted to now-extinct megaherbivores. They tested the response of vegetation to modern cattle and horse grazing, and found that extensive grazing in floodplains established a shifting mosaic of grasses, shrubs and trees similar to conditions during the Pleistocene (and to modern savannas). Ultimately, the role that extinct megafauna played in maintaining openness or landscape heterogeneity remains uncertain in Europe, and has yet to be tested in other parts of the world, although there is supporting experimental evidence from modern African savannas (Asner & Levick, 2012) and Siberia (Zimov et al., 2012).

Megafaunal influences on vegetation may have varied with landscape position

Modern megafaunal populations often exhibit spatial patterning resulting from ties to resources or landscape barriers (Danell et al., 2006). The effects of the LQEs should thus be more readily detectable in areas of suitable habitat, such as lowlands with ample water sources and soil nutrients (Bakker et al., 2004). Svenning (2002) found evidence for open vegetation in the lowlands, while uplands remained closed high forests during the last glacial period. In the early Holocene, however, nonarboreal pollen abundances were reduced in both upland and lowland sites, suggesting that Holocene Europe was dominated by a more closed canopy than during previous interglacials.

The end-Pleistocene extinctions may have affected both the rate and spatial dynamics of biogeochemical cycling

Very little is known about the role of Pleistocene megafauna on nutrient cycles, though a recent modeling effort suggests that there may have been long-term disruptions in nutrient transport and depositions following the LQEs that persist today in many parts of the world (Doughty et al., 2013). Recent advances in lake sediment proxies of ecosystem function may shed light on the role that extinct megaherbivores played on nitrogen and other nutrient dynamics (McLauchlan et al., 2013). One major challenge will be to differentiate allochthonous from autochthonous processes governing lake sediment records of biogeochemistry. Additionally, any sedimentary proxy will integrate processes at the watershed level, and so differentiating spatial heterogeneity at the sub-watershed scale will likely not be possible. This may be an opportunity for modern experimentation to test a paleoecological hypothesis; in a recent test simulating the impacts of the New Zealand moa extinction on nitrogen cycles, Tanentzap et al. (2013) found that avian-derived nitrogen inputs increased native forest regeneration.

Many Holocene plants may be dispersal-limited relative to the Pleistocene

Janzen & Martin (1982) hypothesized that the large, fleshy fruits of some neotropical plants were an adaptation to dispersal by megaherbivores, and that such ‘ecological anachronisms’ now exist out of their coevolutionary context in the absence of extinct Pleistocene dispersers. In addition to bearing large, nutritious fruits, New World trees such as the papaya (Cerica papaya), avocado (Persea americana), honey locust (Gleditsia triancanthos), Kentucky coffee tree (Gymnocladus dioicus), pawpaw (Asimina triloba) and Osage orange (Maculra pomifera) all show adaptations to megafaunal herbivory and dispersal, including clonal growth, root suckers and large thorns (Barlow, 2002). While such taxa are often cited as iconic examples of the ecological implications of the LQEs, there are few empirical tests of whether such plants are dispersal-limited in modern landscapes (but see Campos-Arceiza & Blake 2011 for a review of the importance of extant Proboscideans as seed dispersers). Guimarães et al. (2008) calculated that 103 species of South American plants show the evolutionary traits of megafaunal dispersal. I predict that these plants would exhibit reduced gene flow and increased population structuring due to clustering, reduced geographic ranges and reduced migration rates in the absence of megafaunal dispersers. Janzen (1984) also hypothesized that smaller-seeded plants may be dispersed by large herbivores when consumed with surrounding foliage. Indeed, Vellend et al. (2003) found that deer likely played an important role in the postglacial migration of Trillium; known levels of dispersal by ants would not be sufficient to explain Trillium's postglacial range expansions.

The Late Quaternary Extinctions may have had cascading effects on small mammal communities

Megafaunal-induced changes to vegetation composition and structure may have cascaded to smaller mammals, which are more tied to high-nutrient forage and are often less selective than megaherbivores (Crawley, 1983). Small mammals would also have been affected by changes in landscape openness, as well as the availability of herbaceous taxa and seeds for foraging. Thus far, effects of the megafaunal influences on small-mammal habitats have been largely untested in the paleorecord, although Blois et al. (2010) suggested that megafaunal extinctions may have contributed to reductions in small mammal richness and evenness at a site in California during the Pleistocene/Holocene transition. It will be especially difficult to discriminate megafaunal effects from climate change, but multi-proxy paleorecords (e.g. packrat middens, cave deposits) that record small mammal communities, changes in animal diets (such as those measured in stable isotopes in tooth enamel), and independent records of climate may prove useful.

Conclusions and future directions

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

Previously, climate change was thought to be the primary driver of vegetation dynamics at Quaternary timescales, but the studies cited here are part of a growing body of literature that indicate that megaherbivores – and their extinction – left detectable influences in paleorecords. These effects have been shown to include biome reorganization, novel communities and changes in fire regimes; altered dispersal patterns, nutrient cycles, and other cascading effects are likely. I suggest an updated, integrative model of vegetation dynamics at Quaternary timescales (Fig. 2), including the effects of megaherbivores and interactions between climate change, humans, vegetation, herbivores and fire. In this model, vegetation dynamics are driven by multiple, interacting top-down mechanisms, as well as the feedbacks amongst them. Fundamentally, this model is underlain by the growing evidence that the biotic interactions observed on ecological timescales were also important drivers of vegetation change throughout the Quaternary.

Modern and paleoecological analyses have much to offer one another, particularly with regard to linking the patterns observed by paleoecologists with the processes observed by neo-ecologists. key needs include a better understanding of: (1) direct and indirect effects of herbivores on nutrient cycling (including feedbacks); (2) post-extinction trophic cascades to other species, including insects, birds and small mammals; (3) the role of megafauna in influencing fire regimes, particularly in forested landscapes; (4) factors influencing palatability and preference through time; (5) density-dependent plant–herbivore interactions; (6) synergies between the effects of herbivores and climate change on other biota; (7) the evolutionary consequences of changing defense needs following the release of herbivory pressure; and (8) the effects of megaherbivores on plant dispersal and migration. Potential ways forward will benefit from an integrative approach that includes megaherbivore effects in dynamic global vegetation models (Allen et al., 2010), multi-proxy paleoecological reconstructions, and modern experiments using the closest modern analogs of extinct species.

Growing evidence supports the hypothesis that the loss of megaherbivores – particularly in tandem with changes in climate and anthropogenic activity – resulted in a global ecological regime shift by the early Holocene. Modern megaherbivores are among some of the most threatened species today (Maisels et al., 2013); like their Pleistocene counterparts, extant megafauna face the combined threats of anthropogenic land use and climate change. The ecological consequences of the end-Pleistocene extinctions may thus have relevance not only to understanding the dramatic vegetation changes of the early Holocene, but also in understanding and managing ecosystems in the Anthropocene.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

I am very grateful to four anonymous reviewers, whose comments greatly improved this manuscript. This work was supported by NSF DEB-0716471, a UW Madison Geography Whitbeck Dissertator Fellowship and a Voss Postdoctoral Fellowship with Brown University's Environmental Change Initiative. I thank Jack Williams, Sara Hotchkiss, Joe Mason, Jim Burt, David Mladenoff, Warren Porter and Steve Jackson for valuable comments.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information
  • Allen JRM, Hickler T, Singarayer JS, Sykes MT, Valdes PJ, Huntley B. 2010. Last glacial vegetation of northern Eurasia. Quaternary Science Reviews 29: 1920.
  • Asner GP, Levick SR. 2012. Landscape-scale effects of herbivores on treefall in African savannas. Ecology Letters 15: 12111217.
  • Baker AG, Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ. 2013. Do dung fungal spores make a good proxy for past distribution of herbivores? Quaternary Science Reviews 62: 2131.
  • Bakker ES, Olff H, Vandenberghe C, de Maeyer K, Smit R, Gleichman JM, Vera FWM. 2004. Ecological anachronisms in the recruitment of temperate light- demanding tree species in wooded pastures. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 571582.
  • Barlow C. 2002. The ghosts of evolution: nonsensical fruit, missing partners, and other ecological anachronisms. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.
  • Blois JL, McGuire JL, Hadly EA. 2010. Small mammal diversity loss in response to late-Pleistcoene climatic change. Nature 465: 771774.
  • Bond WJ, Keeley JE. 2005. Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammale ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 387394.
  • Bond WJ, Woodward FI, Midgley GF. 2005. The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. New Phytologist 165: 525538.
  • Burney DA, Robinson GS, Burney LP. 2003. Sporormiella and the late Holocene extinctions in Madagascar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 1080010805.
  • Campos-Arceiza A, Blake S. 2011. Megagardeners of the forest – the role of elephants in seed dispersal. Acta Oecologica 37: 542e553.
  • Craine JM, McLauchlan KK. 2004. The influence of biotic drivers on North American palaeorecords: alternatives to climate. The Holocene 14: 787791.
  • Crawley MJ. 1983. Herbivory: the dynamics of animal–plant interactions. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
  • Danell K, Bergstrom R, Duncan P, Pastor J, eds. 2006. Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics, and conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Daniau AL, Bartlein PJ, Harrison SP, Prentice IC, Brewer S, Friedlingstein P, Harrison-Prentice TI, Inoue J, Izumi K, Marlon JR et al. 2012. Predictability of biomass burning in response to climate changes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 26. GB4007, doi: 10.1029/2011GB004249.
  • Davis OK. 1987. Spores of the dung fungus Sporormiella: increased abundance in historic sdiments and before Pleistocene megafuanal extinction. Quaternary Research 28: 290294.
  • Doughty CE, Wolf A, Malhi Y. 2013. The legacy of the Pleistocene megafauna extinctions on nutrient availability in Amazonia. Nature Geoscience 6: 761764.
  • Feranec RS, Miller NG, Lothrop JC, Graham RW. 2011. The Sporormiella proxy and end-Pleistocene megafaunal extinction: a perspective. Quaternary International 245: 333338.
  • Flannery TF. 1994. The future eaters. New York, NY, USA: Grove Press.
  • Gill JL, McLauchlan KK, Skibbe AM, Goring SJ, Zirbel C, Williams JW. 2013. Linking abundances of the dung fungus Sporormiella to the density of bison: implications for assessing grazing by megaherbivores in paleorecords. Journal of Ecology 101: 11251136.
  • Gill JL, Williams JW, Jackson ST, Donnelly JP, Schellinger GC. 2012. Climatic and megaherbivory controls on late-glacial vegetation dyanmics: a new, high- resolution, multi-proxy record from Silver Lake, Ohio. Quaternary Science Reviews 34: 6680.
  • Gill JL, Williams JW, Jackson ST, Lininger KB, Robinson GS. 2009. Pleistocene megafaunal collapse, novel plant communities, and enhanced fire regimes in North America. Science 326: 11001103.
  • Graham RW, Lundelius EL. 1984. Coevolutionary disequilibrium and Pleistocene extinctions. In: Martin PS, Klein RG, eds. Quaternary extinctions: a prehistoric revolution. Tuscon, AZ, USA: University of Arizona Press, 354404.
  • Guimarães J, Paulo R, Galetti M, Jordano P. 2008. Seed dispersal anachronisms: rethinking the fruits extinct megafauna ate. PLoS ONE 3: 113.
  • Hester AJ, Bergman M, Iason GR, Moen J. 2006. Impacts of large herbivores on plant community structure and dynamics. In: Danell K, Bergstrom R, Duncan P, Pastor J, eds. Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 97141.
  • Illius AW. 2006. Foraging and population dynamics. In: Danell K, Bergström R, Duncan P, Pastor J, eds. Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 7197.
  • Janzen DH. 1984. Dispersal of small seeds by big herbivores: foliage is the fruit. The American Naturalist 123: 338353.
  • Janzen DH, Martin PS. 1982. Neotropical anachronisms: the fruit the Gomphotheres ate. Science 215: 1927.
  • Johnson CN. 2009. Ecological consequences of Late Quaternary extinctions of megafauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 25092519.
  • Koch PL, Barnosky AD. 2006. Late Quaternary extinctions: state of the debate. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 215250.
  • Lorenzen ED, Nogués-Bravo D, Orlando L, Weinstock J, Binladen J, Marske KA, Ugan A, Borregaard MK, Gilbert MTP, Nielsen R et al. 2011. Species-specific respones of Late Quaternary megafauna to climate and humans. Nature 479: 359364.
  • Maisels F, Strindberg S, Blake S, Wittemyer G. 2013. Devastating decline of forest elephants in Central Africa. PLoS ONE 8: e59469.
  • McLauchlan KK, Williams JJ, Craine JM, Jeffers ES. 2013. Changes in global nitrogen cycling during the Holocene epoch. Nature 495: 352355.
  • Mitchell FJG. 2005. How open were European primeval forests? Hypothesis testing using palaeoecological data. Journal of Ecology 93: 168177.
  • Owen-Smith NK. 1987. Pleistocene extinctions: the pivotal role of megaherbivores. Paleobiology 13: 351362.
  • Owen-Smith RN. 1988. Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Richardson MJ. 2001. Diversity and occurrence of coprophilous fungi. Mycological Research 105: 387402.
  • Robinson GS, Burney LP, Burney DA. 2005. Landscape paleoecology and megafaunal extinction in southeastern New York State. Ecological Monographs 75: 295315.
  • Rule S, Brook BW, Haberle SG, Turney CSM, Kershaw AP, Johnson CN. 2012. The aftermath of megafaunal extinction: ecosystem transformation in Pleistocene Australia. Science 335: 14831486.
  • Sankaran M, Hanan NP, Scholes RJ, Ratnam J, Augustine DJ, Cade BS, Gignoux J, Higgins SI, Le Roux X, Ludwig F et al. 2005. Determinants of woody cover in African savannas. Nature 438: 846849.
  • Smith FS, Elliott SM, Lyons SK. 2010. Methane emissions from extinct megafauna. Nature Geoscience 3: 374375.
  • Svenning J-C. 2002. A review of natural vegetation openness in Northwestern Europe. Biological Conservation 104: 133148.
  • Tanentzap AJ, Lee WG, Monks A. 2013. Increased nitrogen cycling facilitates native forest regeneration: potential for restoring extinct ecological processes? Ecological Applications 23: 3645.
  • Vellend M, Myers JA, Gardescu S, Marks PL. 2003. Dispersal of Trillium seeds by deer: implications for long-distance migration of forest herbs. Ecology 84: 10671972.
  • Vera FWM. 2000. Grazing ecology and forest history. Oxford, UK: CABI Publishing.
  • Zimov SA, Zimov NS, Tikhonov AN, Chapin FS. 2012. Mammoth steppe: a high-productivity phenomenon. Quaternary Science Reviews 57: 2645.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Modern megaherbivore ecology
  5. The Late Quaternary Extinctions: patterns and causes
  6. Sporormiella: a dung fungus proxy of megaherbivory
  7. Ecological consequences of the Late Quaternary Extinctions
  8. Conclusions and future directions
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. References
  11. Supporting Information

Please note: Wiley Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
nph12576-sup-0001-TableS1.docxWord document21K

Table S1 Selected effects of megaherbivores on vegetation in modern landscapes