Get access

Predicting muscle mass from anthropometry using magnetic resonance imaging as reference: a systematic review

Authors

  • Yasmin Y Al-Gindan,

    1. Human Nutrition, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Catherine R Hankey,

    1. Human Nutrition, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Wilma Leslie,

    1. Human Nutrition, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lindsay Govan,

    1. Institute of Health and Well Being, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michael EJ Lean

    Corresponding author
    1. Human Nutrition, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
    • Correspondence: MEJ Lean, Human Nutrition, MVLS, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK. E-mail: Mike.Lean@glasgow.ac.uk, Phone: +44-141-211-4686, Fax: +44-141-211-4844.

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Identification and management of sarcopenia are limited by lack of reliable simple approaches to assess muscle mass. The aim of this review is to identify and evaluate simple methods to quantify muscle mass/volume of adults. Using Cochrane Review methodology, Medline (1946–2012), Embase (1974–2012), Web of Science (1898–2012), PubMed, and the Cochrane Library (to 08/2012) were searched for publications that included prediction equations (from anthropometric measurements) to estimate muscle mass by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in adults. Of 257 papers identified from primary search terms, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 10) assessed only regional/limb muscle mass/volume. Many studies (n = 9) assessed limb circumference adjusted for skinfold thickness, which limits their practical applications. Only two included validation in separate subject-samples, and two reported relationships between whole-body MRI-measured muscle mass and anthropometry beyond linear correlations. In conclusion, one simple prediction equation shows promise, but it has not been validated in a separate population with different investigators. Furthermore, it did not incorporate widely available trunk/limb girths, which have offered valuable prediction of body composition in other studies.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary