Does the Order and Timing of Active Labour Market Programmes Matter?
Article first published online: 11 FEB 2013
© Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Department of Economics, University of Oxford 2013
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Volume 75, Issue 2, pages 180–212, April 2013
How to Cite
Lechner, M. and Wiehler, S. (2013), Does the Order and Timing of Active Labour Market Programmes Matter?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75: 180–212. doi: 10.1111/obes.12007
- Issue published online: 4 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 11 FEB 2013
- Final Manuscript Received: October 2012
This study extends the traditional focus of active labour market policy evaluation from a static comparison of participation in a programme versus non-participation (or participation in another programme) to the evaluation of the effects of programme sequences, that is, multiple participation or timing of such programmes. Explicitly allowing for dynamic selection into different stages of such programme sequences we analyse multiple programmes, the timing of programmes, and the order of programmes. The analysis is based on comprehensive administrative data on the Austrian labour force. Our findings suggest that (i) active job search programmes are more effective after a qualification programme compared to the reverse order, (ii) multiple participation in qualification measures dominates single participation and (iii) the effectiveness of several labour market programmes deteriorates the later they start during an unemployment spell.