Get access

ADVOCACY COALITIONS IN CRISIS RESOLUTION: UNDERSTANDING POLICY DISPUTE IN THE EUROPEAN VOLCANIC ASH CLOUD CRISIS

Authors

  • DANIEL NOHRSTEDT

    1. Daniel Nohrstedt is Associate Professor in Political Science in the Department of Government and the Center for Natural Disaster Science (CNDS), Uppsala University, Sweden.
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Disruptive crises are generally conducive to policy conflict between multiple stakeholders. Following the potentially adversarial nature of crisis resolution, there is a need for theoretical approaches to advance the understanding of the political context in which such disputes evolve. This article explains how the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) can be applied as a theoretical basis for understanding the development and effects of policy conflicts in crisis resolution. Illustrating the ACF as a tool for descriptive policy analysis in this context, the article conducts a case study of the European response to the 2010 volcanic ash cloud crisis, focusing on the nature of the policy subsystem, the role of scientific information, competing crisis narratives, exploitation of resources and venues, and policy change. The concluding section identifies a set of theoretical implications and specifies how the framework can be used by practitioners to mitigate the effects of policy conflicts on crisis resolution.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary