Earlier versions of this essay were presented at The Kerala International Center, Thiruvananthapuram, India, The Anderson School of Management, UCLA, The US–China Institute, USC, and Tuesday Talk at Claremont Graduate University as well as the 24th Annual Conference of the Association of Chinese Political Studies, King's College, London, 17–21 June 2011. It was presented at various seminars in China, including those at Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Zhongshan University, and Xinjiang Normal University. The author wishes to thank the participants in these events as well as Jacek Kugler, Paul Perez, Hilton Root, Thomas Willet, and Piotr M. Zagorowski for comments and discussions. He also thanks Claremont Graduate University for fieldwork support in Europe and China. Piotr M. Zagorowski provided editorial assistance and collected data. The author thanks two anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments. Last but not least, he wishes to express his deep gratitude to Ms. Betty Hagelbarger, who has carefully read the manuscript and has offered perspicuous advice.
Global Power Transitions and Their Implications for the 21st Century†
Article first published online: 4 AUG 2013
© 2013 Center for International Studies, Inha University
Special Issue: Chinese Foreign Policy: The Quest for Power, Security, and Status
Volume 28, Issue 2, pages 170–189, August 2013
How to Cite
Feng, Y. (2013), Global Power Transitions and Their Implications for the 21st Century. Pacific Focus, 28: 170–189. doi: 10.1111/pafo.12007
- Issue published online: 4 AUG 2013
- Article first published online: 4 AUG 2013
- global powers;
- power transitions;
This essay presents a theoretical approach toward war and peace, reviews basic conditions for world leadership, discusses four modes of global power transitions, illuminates the likely emergence of the future superpowers, and summarizes the differences and common interests between the United States, the incumbent world leader, and China, a potential contender for the global leadership in the 21st century. The theoretical background is power-transition theory, which predicts war when superpowers are close in power and peace when power preponderance exists. Power parity need be also considered in the context of common interests and preferences of superpowers. Conflict abates when the nations share fundamental rules of the game in world affairs. Four historical modes of transitions – co-dominion, deterrence, confrontation, and cooperation – were identified. Of the four historical transitions, each time, the challenger surpassed the hegemon in economic power, and deterrence and confrontation by the hegemon against the challenger did not prevent the challenger from assuming global leadership in the long term. Among the newly rising nations (BRICs), China is discussed as a potential contender for world leadership. The economic and financial interdependence between the United States and China is currently the driving force in their relations. It shapes their political arrangements, necessitating coordination and cooperation in policy issues. While economic collaboration and interdependence drive the relations between the two, they are not sufficient conditions for a peaceful transition, until their political and security relations are solidified and their preferences coalesce substantively.