Development of the scale of psychosocial factors in food allergy (SPS-FA)
Article first published online: 12 SEP 2013
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
Volume 24, Issue 7, pages 671–677, November 2013
How to Cite
Development of the scale of psychosocial factors in food allergy (SPS-FA). Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013: 24: 671–677., , .
- Issue published online: 8 OCT 2013
- Article first published online: 12 SEP 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 JUL 2013
- National Commission of Scientific
- Technologic Research (CONICYT from Spanish acronym)
- Office for Support of Clinical Research (OAIC)
- food allergy;
- quality of life;
Food allergy (FA) is a growing condition among children and it's psychological impact over the patients and their caregivers is well known, establishing a vicious circle that perpetuates stress levels. However, psychosocial factors are not commonly included in allergy treatments. Based on the lack of evidence of records about a scale that indicates the level of interaction between biopsychosocial factors in the patient–caregivers dyad for FA, the present research aims to develop a scale with these characteristics as a helpful tool to achieve a more comprehensive system of health care.
A preliminary 28-item scale was generated (sample N = 99). The scale was adjusted in contents and language after expert opinion and application on patients. A factor analysis was carried out selecting the items from the final scale.
The final 9-item scale included three areas: impact on quality of life, social impact and conflicts. The scale had a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.870) and correlated significantly with anxiety and depression measurements. Moreover, it was able to discriminate between study groups (members and non-members of peer support groups) and proved construct validity.
The SPS-FA is the first scale for the assessment of the interaction of biopsychosocial factors on FA that includes the patient–caregiver dyad. Its application might be relevant for future research, and it can provide the clinician and the researcher with a solid tool to define which type of psychosocial support is required to provide a more comprehensive care in FA.