Figure S1. Venn diagram comparison between the data published by Osuna et al. (2007) and this work.
Figure S2. PageMan visualization of Arabidopsis gene expression changes in response to C depletion.
Figure S3. The expression pattern of C depletion-responding genes in Arabidopsis seedlings from various MapMan BINs.
Figure S4. Hierarchical image of the gene ontology (GO) terms associated with biological processes over-represented in genes that are induced in response to (a) 3, 6 or 12 h, (b) 24 h and (c) 48–72 h C depletion and repressed in response to (d) 3, 6 or 12 h, (e) 24 h and (e) 48–72 h C depletion.
Figure S5. Web interface displays from Usadel et al. (2008) showing the response of the genes in each cluster in Fig. to light, to C and to the circadian clock as well as the response during a diurnal cycle and extension of the night in Col-0 and a diurnal cycle in pgm.
Figure S6. Box plots of the gene expression responses of the genes that are (a) up-regulated and (b) down-regulated in response to 30 min sucrose readdition but do not respond to C depletion.
Figure S7. Relationship between the transcriptional response to sucrose readdition to Arabidopsis seedlings at different times in the C-depletion time series.
Figure S8. Comparison of the transcriptional responses during C depletion and sucrose readdition with the published response of overexpression of three C-signalling components: AKIN10 (SnRK1), bZIP11 and otsA (to increase Tre6P).
Table S1. The normalized signal intensities for all 22750 ATH1 probe sets from the 35 arrays from the C-depletion time course and cordycepin treatment experiments.
Table S2. PageMan input file with ATH1 identifier codes and gene expression changes during the C-depletion time course.
Table S3. Clustering of C-depletion responses.
Table S4. Analysis of MapMan BINs/functional groups over-represented in clusters of genes responding to C depletion.
Table S5. Transcripts responding to 30 min of 15 mm sucrose readdition to carbohydrate-starved seedlings.
Table S6. Analysis of functional groups over-represented in the 104 transcripts responding to sucrose readdition and to C depletion.
Table S7. Analysis of functional groups over-represented in the 46 transcripts responding to sucrose readdition and not responding to C depletion.
Table S8. Transcripts differentially expressed in response to 30 min of 15 mm sucrose readdition to C-depleted seedlings during the first 24 h of the time course.
Table S9. Transcripts differentially expressed in response to 30 min of 15 mm sucrose readdition or 1 h of 0.6 mm cordycepin A treatment to C-depleted seedlings.
Table S10. Analysis of functional groups over-represented in the transcripts induced by C depletion and repressed by 1 h of 0.6 mm cordycepin A treatment to C-depleted seedlings.
Table S11. Analysis of functional groups over-represented in the transcripts repressed by C depletion and 1 h of 0.6 mm cordycepin A treatment to C-depleted seedlings.
Table S12. Analysis of the promoter motifs over-represented in clusters of genes responding to C depletion.
Table S13. Analysis of the promoter motifs over-represented in genes repressed in response to 30 min of 15 mm sucrose readdition to C-depleted seedlings.
Table S14. Comparison of the transcriptional responses during C depletion and sucrose readdition with the published response of overexpression of three C-signalling components: AKIN10, bZIP11 and otsA.
Text S1. Explanation for Fig. S5.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
1365-3040/asset/pce_large.jpg?v=1&s=48a8cf37cde4b69883b0e19ffb1aefdf374b3220)