• Asher, Nicholas and Morreau, Michael (1995). ‘What Some Generics Mean,’ in Carlson C. and Pelletier J. (eds.) The Generic Book, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp.300338.
  • Carlson, Gregory and Pelletier, Jeffery eds. (1995). The Generic Book, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Clarke, Randolph (1994). ‘Ability and Responsibility for Omissions,’ Philosophical Studies, vol. 73, pp.195208.
  • Fischer, John Martin (1982). ‘Responsibility and Control,’ The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 79, pp.2440.
  • Fischer, John Martin (1994). The Metaphysics of Free Will, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frankfurt, Harry (1969). ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,’ Journal of Philosophy, vol. 66, pp.82939.
  • Frankfurt, Harry (1994). ‘An Alleged Asymmetry Between Actions and Omissions,’ Ethics, vol. 104, pp.620623.
  • Horgan, Terrence (1979). ‘‘Could’, Possible Worlds, and Moral Responsibility,’ Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 17, pp.34558.
  • Jackson, Frank (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kratzer, Angelika (1981). ‘The Notional Category of Modality,’ in H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp.3874.
  • Lance, Mark and Little, Margaret (2004). ‘Defeasibility and the Normative Grasp of Context,’ Erkenntnis, vol. 61, pp.435455.
  • Lange, Marc (2002). ‘Who's Afraid of Ceteris-Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them,’ Erkenntnis, vol. 57, pp.281301.
  • Levy, Neil (2008). ‘Counterfactual Intervention and Agents’ Capacities,’ Journal of Philosophy, vol. 105, pp.223239.
  • Lewis, David (1970). ‘How to Define Theoretical Terms,’ The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, pp.42746.
  • McIntyre, Alison (1994). ‘Compatibilists Could Have Done Otherwise: Responsibility and Negative Agency,’ Philosophical Review, vol. 103, pp.453488.
  • Mele, Alfred (2006). Free Will and Luck, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mele, Alfred and Robb, David (1998). ‘Rescuing Frankfurt-Style Cases,’ Philosophical Review, vol. 107, pp.97112.
  • Menzies, Peter (1996). ‘Probabilistic Causation and the Pre-Emption Problem,’ Mind, vol. 105, pp.85117.
  • Nickel, Bernhard (2010). ‘Ceteris Paribus Laws: Generics and Natural Kinds,’ Philosophers’ Imprint, vol. 10, no. 6.
  • Pietroski, Paul and Rey, Georges (1995). ‘When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws From Vacuity,’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 46, pp.81110.
  • Smith, Michael (2003). ‘Rational Capacities, or: How to Distinguish Recklessness, Weakness, and Compulsion,’ reprinted in his Ethics and the A Priori (2004), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114135.
  • Sober, Elliott (1984). The Nature of Natural Selection, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Strevens, Michael (2012). ‘Ceteris Paribus Hedges: Causal Voodoo That Works,’ The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 109, pp.652675.
  • Whittle, Ann (manuscript). ‘On An Alleged Asymmetry Between Acts and Omissions.’