Disclosure: This research was supported in part by grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Community Alliance for Health Research and Exchange in Pain and the Jesse and Julie Rasch Foundation. There are no conflicts of interests to disclose.
Evaluation of Chronic Pain-Related Information Available to Consumers on the Internet
Article first published online: 8 APR 2013
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Volume 14, Issue 6, pages 855–864, June 2013
How to Cite
Bailey, S. J., LaChapelle, D. L., LeFort, S. M., Gordon, A. and Hadjistavropoulos, T. (2013), Evaluation of Chronic Pain-Related Information Available to Consumers on the Internet. Pain Medicine, 14: 855–864. doi: 10.1111/pme.12087
- Issue published online: 20 JUN 2013
- Article first published online: 8 APR 2013
- Canadian Institutes for Health Research Community Alliance for Health Research and Exchange in Pain
- Jesse and Julie Rasch Foundation
- Chronic Pain;
- Consumer Evaluations
Recent surveys suggest more than one third of patients utilize the Internet to seek information about chronic pain (CP) and that 60% of patients feel more confident in the information provided online than provided by their physician. Unfortunately, the quality of online information is questionable. For example, some Websites make unsubstantiated claims while others may have covert motives (i.e., product advertisement). This article presents two studies that utilized a well-validated tool to evaluate the quality of online CP-related information.
A Website search was conducted by entering the most commonly used pain-related search terms into the three most commonly used search engines in North America. In study 1, the first 50 Websites from each search were evaluated using a consumer-focused evaluation tool—the DISCERN. In study 2, 21 clients with CP used the DISCERN to rate a random selection of Websites from among the 10 highest scoring and five lower scoring sites from Study 1, and answered open-ended questions regarding the DISCERN and Websites.
Ratings indicated that Websites ranged substantially in quality, with many providing incomplete and incorrect information, and others providing accurate and detailed information. The majority of the Websites provided low-quality information. Client ratings of the Websites were consistent with those of the researchers.
Overall, these findings speak to the risks associated with clients making CP-related treatment choices based on information obtained online without first evaluating the Website.