Get access

Clinical and Resource Utilization Patterns in Patients with Refractory Neuropathic Pain Prescribed Pregabalin for the First Time in Routine Medical Practice in Primary Care Settings in Spain

Authors


  • Author Disclosure
  • Role of Funding Source: Data collection and analysis were funded by Pfizer S.L.U. All authors had complete access to the data, participated in the analysis and/or interpretation of results, and drafted the manuscript.
  • Conflicts of interest: Javier Rejas and Maria Pérez are employees of Pfizer S.L.U. Xavier Masramón is an employee of European Biometric Institute (EBI), a paid contractor of Pfizer S.L.U. for the development of the statistical analysis application for this study. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  • Contributors: This was a collaborative work, and the authors worked together closely. MTS, CP, AN, MP, and JR participated in the design of the original study and in the interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript. XM participated in the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors were responsible for literature review and extraction of references.

Abstract

Context and Objective

To describe clinical and resource utilization patterns in patients with refractory neuropathic pain (NeP) who were prescribed pregabalin for the first time in routine medical practice in primary care settings.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of a 12-week prospective observational study including pregabalin naïve adult patients with refractory chronic NeP of at least 6-months duration. Self-reported pain intensity, disability, sleep disturbances, symptoms of anxiety and depression, disability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health care resource utilization, and corresponding costs were assessed in this post-hoc analysis.

Results

One thousand three hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study, and three treatment groups were identified: 1) 598 patients replaced prior pain treatments with pregabalin as monotherapy; 2) 589 added pregabalin to their existing pain treatments; and 3) 167 other pain treatments were prescribed according with physician routine medical practice. Statistically significant differences were reported at baseline for intensity of pain, patient disability, severity of depressive symptoms, and HRQoL (P < 0.01 in all cases). No statistically significant differences were reported among the three treatment groups for anxiety severity or sleep disturbances. Subjects who received add-on pregabalin had greater use of direct and indirect resources vs the other groups, resulting in significantly higher quarterly overall costs per patient: €2,397 (2,308), €2,470 (1,857), and €3,110 (2,496), respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that primary care physicians chose pregabalin as an option for treating refractory patients who tended to have much more severe NeP profiles, costing society more than when they chose other therapeutic strategies not including pregabalin.

Ancillary