Original Article
A Dual Process Model of Attitudes towards Immigration: Person × Residential Area Effects in a National Sample
Article first published online: 24 JAN 2013
DOI: 10.1111/pops.12009
© 2013 International Society of Political Psychology
Issue

Political Psychology
Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)
Additional Information
How to Cite
Sibley, C. G., Duckitt, J., Bergh, R., Osborne, D., Perry, R., Asbrock, F., Robertson, A., Armstrong, G., Wilson, M. S. and Barlow, F. K. (2013), A Dual Process Model of Attitudes towards Immigration: Person × Residential Area Effects in a National Sample. Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12009
Publication History
- Article first published online: 24 JAN 2013
Funded by
- University of Auckland FRDF. Grant Number: 3624435/9853
- ECREA. Grant Number: 3626075
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- social worldviews;
- person × situation;
- immigrant density;
- regional deprivation;
- immigration
This research took a person × situation approach to predicting prejudice by looking at how social worldviews interact with real-world environmental factors to predict how people respond to immigrants within their local area. Taking a Dual Process Motivational approach, we hypothesized that a higher proportion of immigrants in the local community would be associated with negative attitudes toward immigration for respondents high in dangerous world beliefs. Conversely, we hypothesized that living in a highly affluent (as opposed to socioeconomically deprived) community would be associated with negative attitudes toward immigration for respondents high in competitive world beliefs. Both hypotheses were supported using regional information derived from national census data combined with representative survey data from a large telephone sample conducted in New Zealand (N = 6,489). These findings support the proposition that individual differences interact with specific features of the environment to predict people's levels of prejudice in distinct ways.

1467-9221/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=22115c9226a7ecbcd24b5c1e361693fd437cf42c)
1467-9221/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=6a54a60d8804566225eb732399e2e6ae16e9f590)