SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abel, M. H., & Brown, L. K. (1998). Validity of the 16PF reasoning ability scale. Psychological Reports, 83, 904906.
  • Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. Alicke , D. Dunning , & J. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 85106). New York, NY: Psychology Press
  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. London, UK: Jossey Bass.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Consiglio, C., Picconi, L., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 849856.
  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20(1), 175197.
  • Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807840.
  • Cohrs, J. C., Kämpfe-Hargrave, N., & Riemann, R. (2012). Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: Evidence from peer-report data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 343361.
  • Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). The 16PF 4th edition technical manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
  • Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 10921122.
  • Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158175.
  • DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 11381151.
  • DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 711737). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duriez, B., Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 299320.
  • Edwards, A. L. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(2), 9093.
  • Feather, N. T. (2005). Values, religion and motivation. In M. L. Maehr & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation and religion (pp. 3573). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The Eugene–Springfield community sample: Information available from the research participants. ORI Technical Report, 45(1).
  • Heaven, P. C. L., Ciarrochi, J., & Leeson, P. (2011) Cognitive ability, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation: A five-year longitudinal study amongst adolescents. Intelligence, 39(1), 1521.
  • Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Xu, X., & Peterson, J. B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(5), 655664.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102138). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339375.
  • Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307337.
  • Ludeke, S. L. (2014). Truth and fiction in the association between Openness and education: The role of biased responding. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Ludeke, S. L., & DeYoung, C. G. (in press). Differences in negativity bias probably underlie variation in attitudes toward change generally, not political ideology specifically. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
  • Ludeke, S. L., Weisberg, Y. J., & DeYoung, C. G. (2013). Idiographically desirable responding: Individual differences in perceived trait desirability predict overclaiming. European Journal of Personality. doi:10.1002/per.1914
  • McCrae, R. R.,& Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882888.
  • Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 148157.
  • Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Bellavia, G., Griffin, D. W., & Dolderman, D. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 563581.
  • Neimeyer, R. A., & Mitchell, K. A. (1988). Similarity and attraction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(2), 131148.
  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 660679.
  • Osborne, D., Wootton, L. W., & Sibley, C. G. (in press). Are liberals agreeable or not? Social Psychology.
  • Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun , D. N. Jackson , & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 4969). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 10251060.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741763.
  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313345.
    Direct Link:
  • Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506516.
  • Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10(October), 6177.
  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422445.
  • Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248279.
  • Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(5), 540559.
  • Simonton, D. (2006). Presidential IQ, openness, intellectual brilliance, and leadership: Estimates and correlations for 42 U.S. chief executives. Political Psychology, 27(4), 511526.
  • Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., & De Pauw, S. (2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 17651799.
  • Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281300.
  • Verhulst, B., Hatemi, P. K., & Martin, N. G. (2010). The nature of the relationship between personality traits and political attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 306316.