SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Whiting R, Rainosek A, Buchanan R, Miliotis M, LaBarre D, Long W, Ruple A, Schaub S. Determining the microbiological criteria for lot rejection from the performance objective or food safety objective. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2006; 110:263267.
  • 2
    ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods). Micro-Organisms in Foods 7: Microbiological Testing in Food Safety Management. New York: Springer, 2002.
  • 3
    Codex (Codex Alimentarius Commission). General Guidelines on Sampling. Rome: FAO, 2004.
  • 4
    Codex (Codex Alimentarius Commission). Recommended Methods of Sampling for the Determination of Pesticide Residues for Compliance with MRLs. Rome: FAO, 1999.
  • 5
    Montgomery DC. Introduction to Quality Control, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005.
  • 6
    Haas CN, Rose JB, Gerba CP. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999.
  • 7
    Washington State University. Avian Health and Food Safety Laboratory Fee Schedule, 2012. Available at: http://www.vetmed.wsu.edu/depts_waddl/avian.aspx#Fees, Accessed on June 26, 2012.
  • 8
    New Zealand Parliamentary Counsel Office. Food (Fees and Charges) Regulations 1997, 2008. Available at: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/1997/0100/latest/DLM232769.html?search=ts_regulation_food_resel&sr=1, Accessed on June 26, 2012.
  • 9
    Georgia Ports Authority. Rule 34-525 Government Agency Inspections, 2012. Available at: http://www.gaports.com/tabid/244/xmid/3373/xmview/2/xmmid/741/Default.aspx, Accessed on December 12, 2012.
  • 10
    Esteban E. Food Safety and Inspection Service, 2013, personal communication.
  • 11
    Connelly LB. Balancing the number and size of sites: An economic approach to the optimal design of cluster samples. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2003; 24:544559.
  • 12
    WTO (World Trade Organization). Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Geneva: WTO, 1994.
  • 13
    Cannon R. Inspecting and monitoring on a restricted budget—Where best to look? Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2009; 92:163174.
  • 14
    National Research Council. An Evaluation of the Role of Microbiological Criteria for Foods and Food Ingredients. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1985.
  • 15
    Cohen MA. Empirical research on the deterrent effect of environmental monitoring and enforcement. Environmental Law Reporter, 2000; 30(4):1024510252.
  • 16
    Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
  • 17
    National Toxicology Program. National Toxicology Program's Report of the Endocrine Disruptors Low-Dose Peer Review. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, 2001.
  • 18
    Starbird SA. Designing food safety regulations: The effect of inspection policy and penalties for noncompliance on food processor behavior. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2000; 25(2):616635.
  • 19
    Starbird AS. Moral hazard, inspection policy, and food safety. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005; 87(1):1527.
    Direct Link:
  • 20
    Harrington W. Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted. Journal of Public Economics, 1988; 37:2953.
  • 21
    Bier VM, Shi-Woei L. Should the model for risk-informed regulation be game theory rather than decision theory? Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(2):281291.