• 1
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. Climate Change 2007: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • 2
    United Nations. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Rio de Janeiro: United Nation, 1992.
  • 3
    Nisbet MC, Myers T. The polls—trends—twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2007; 71(3):444470.
  • 4
    Pew Research Center for People & the Press. Fewer Americans See Solid Evidence of Global Warming. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for People & the Press, 2009.
  • 5
    Gallup. Americans Global Warming Concerns Continue to Drop. Princeton, NJ: Gallup, 2010.
  • 6
    Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in January 2010. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change, 2010.
  • 7
    Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, SmithN. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in May 2011. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 2011.
  • 8
    Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, et al. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in November 2011. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 2011.
  • 9
    Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Hmielowski JD. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in March 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 2012.
  • 10
    Department for Transport. Public Attitudes Towards Climate Change and the Impact of Transport. London: Department for Transport, UK Government, 2010.
  • 11
    Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF, Lorenzoni I. Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power, Climate Change and Energy Options in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted During October and November 2005. Technical Report, Working Paper 06–02. Norwich: Centre for Environmental Risk, University of East Anglia, 2005.
  • 12
    Spence A, Venables D, Pidgeon N, et al. Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in January–March 2010. Technical Report, Understanding Risk. Working Paper 10–01. Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University, 2010.
  • 13
    Pidgeon N. Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy, 2012; 12:S85S106.
  • 14
    Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC. Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 2012; 114(2):169188.
  • 15
    Pew Research Center for the People & the Press Press. Public Priorities: Deficit Rising, Terrorism Slipping. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, 2012.
  • 16
    Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Hmielowski JD. Climate Change in the American Mind: Public Support for Climate & Energy Policies in March 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 2012.
  • 17
    Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science, 1987; 236:280285.
  • 18
    O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19(3):461471.
  • 19
    Stedman RC. Risk and climate change: Perceptions of key policy actors in Canada. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(5):13951406.
  • 20
    Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 2001; 127(2):267286.
  • 21
    Slovic P, Peters E. Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2006; 15(6):322235.
    Direct Link:
  • 22
    Finucane ML. Emotion, affect, and risk communication with older adults: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Risk Research, 2008; 11(8):983997.
  • 23
    Smith N, Leiserowitz A. The rise of global warming scepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32:10211032.
  • 24
    Leiserowitz AA. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 2006; 77(1–2):4572.
  • 25
    Siegrist M, Keller C, Cousin ME. Implicit attitudes toward nuclear power and mobile phone base stations: Support for the affect heuristic. Risk Analysis, 2006; 26(4):10211029.
  • 26
    Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000; 13(1):117.
  • 27
    Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19(4):689701.
  • 28
    Lerner JS, Keltner D. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 2000; 14(4):473493.
  • 29
    Meijnders AL, Midden CJH, Wilke HAM. Role of negative emotion in communication about CO2 risks. Risk Analysis, 2001; 21(5):955966.
  • 30
    Forgas JP. Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multiprocess model. Pp. 227275 in Zanna MP (ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1992.
  • 31
    Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. The affect heuristic. Pp. 397420 in Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 32
    Lerner JS, Gonzalez RM, Small DA, Fischhoff B. Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 2003; 14(2):144150.
    Direct Link:
  • 33
    Sjoberg L. Emotions and risk perception. Risk Management, 2007; 9:223237.
  • 34
    Peters EM, Burraston B, Mertz CK. An emotion-based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: Cognitive appraisals of emotion, affective reactivity, worldviews, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(5):13491367.
  • 35
    Nauta MJ, Fischer ARH, van Asselt ED, et al. Food safety in the domestic environment: The effect of consumer risk information on human disease risks. Risk Analysis, 2008; 28(1):179192.
  • 36
    Schwarz N, Bless H, Bohner G. Mood and persuasion—Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1991; 24:161199.
  • 37
    Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Pp. 123205 in Berkowitz L (ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1986.
  • 38
    Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information-processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980; 39(5):752766.
  • 39
    Hoijer B. Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 2010; 19(6):717731.
  • 40
    Nabi RL. Exploring the framing effects of emotion—Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 2003; 30(2):224247.
  • 41
    Truelove HB. Energy source perceptions and policy support: Image associations, emotional evaluations, and cognitive beliefs. Energy Policy, 2012; 45:478489.
  • 42
    Damasio AR. The Feeling of What Happens. New York: Harcourt Inc, 1999.
  • 43
    Slovic P, MacGregor DG, Peters E. Imagery, Affect, and Decision-Making. Eugene, OR: Decision Research, 1998.
  • 44
    Szalay LN, Deese J. Subjective Meaning and Culture: An Assessment Through Word Associations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.
  • 45
    Peters E, Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1996; 26(16):14271453.
  • 46
    Leiserowitz A. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(6):14331442.
  • 47
    Dake K. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk—An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1991; 22(1):6182.
  • 48
    Dake K. Myths of nature—Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 1992; 48(4):2137.
  • 49
    Rippl S. Cultural theory and risk perception: A proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 2002; 5:147165.
  • 50
    Plutchik R. A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. Pp. 331 in Plutchik R, Kellerman H (eds). Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, Vol. 1: Theories of Emotion. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
  • 51
    Silvia PJ. Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2008; 17(1):5760.
    Direct Link:
  • 52
    Lorenzoni I, Leiserowitz A, Doria MD, et al. Cross-national comparisons of image associations with “global warming’’ and “climate change’’ among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research, 2006; 9(3):265281.
  • 53
    Hulme M. The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. Geographical Journal, 2008; 174:516.
  • 54
    Feinberg M, Willer R. Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological Science, 2011; 22(1):3438.
  • 55
    O'Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S. “Fear won't do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 2009; 30(3):355379.
  • 56
    Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing, 1984.
  • 57
    Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 2000; 27(5):591615.
  • 58
    Moser SC. More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information. Pp. 64–80 in Moser SC, Dilling L (eds). Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • 59
    Moser S. Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change, 2010; 1:3153.
  • 60
    Öhman A. Fear and anxiety: Evolutionary, cognitive, and clinical perspectives. Pp. 573593 in Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM (eds). Handbook of Emotions. New York: Guilford Press, 2000.
  • 61
    Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. London: Bloomsbury, 1996.
  • 62
    National Research Council. Informing an Effective Response to Climate Change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2010.
  • 63
    Kasperson RE, Kasperson JX. Hidden hazards. Pp. 928 in Mayo DC, Hollander R (eds). Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Hazard Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • 64
    Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 2007; 17(3–4):445459.
  • 65
    Hart PS, Nisbet E. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 2012; 39(6):701723.
  • 66
    Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK. Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS One, 2011; 6(3):e17571.
  • 67
    Beckjord EB, Rutten LJF, Arora NK, et al. Information processing and negative affect: Evidence from the 2003 health information national trends survey. Health Psychology, 2008; 27(2):249257.
  • 68
    Cameron LD, Reeve J. Risk perceptions, worry, and attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Psychology and Health, 2006; 21(2):211230.
  • 69
    Weber EU. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 2006; 77(1–2):103120.
  • 70
    Macgregor D. Worry over technological activities and life concerns. Risk Analysis, 1991; 11(2):315324.
  • 71
    Brosschot JF, Gerin W, Thayer JF. The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2006; 60(2):113124.
  • 72
    Knepp MM, Friedman BH. Cardiac reactivity in high and low trait worry women. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Austin, TX, 2008.
  • 73
    Simons J, Zimmer R, Vierboom C, et al. The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2009; 11(7):15551571.
  • 74
    Diaz Meneses G. Refuting fear in heuristics and in recycling promotion. Journal of Business Research, 2010; 63(2):104110.
  • 75
    Roeser S. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(6):10331040.
  • 76
    Markowitz EM, Shariff AF. Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change, 2012; 2(4):243247.
  • 77
    Magaletta PR, Oliver JM. The hope construct, will, and ways: Their relations with self-efficacy, optimism, and general well-being. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1999; 55(5):539551.
  • 78
    Myers TA, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 2012; 113(3–4):11051112.
  • 79
    Spence A, Pidgeon N. Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 2010; 20:656667.
  • 80
    Lewis I, Watson B, White KM. An examination of message-relevant affect in road safety messages: Should road safety advertisements aim to make us feel good or bad? Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2008; 11(6):403417.