SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Jones GM, Bailey TL. Understanding the basics of mastitis. u.o.: Virginia Cooperative Extension. Publication 404233, 2009.
  • 2
    Nielsen C, Ostergaard S, Emanuelson U, Andersson H, Berglund B, Strandberg E. Economic consequences of mastitis and withdrawal of milk with high somatic cell count in Swedish dairy herds. Animal, 2010; 4(10):17581770.
  • 3
    McInerney J. Animal Welfare, Economics and Policy. Report on a Study Undertaken for the Farm & Animal Health Economics Division of Defra. Exeter, UK: Defra, 2004.
  • 4
    Tonsor GT, Wolf CA. On mandatory labeling of animal welfare attributes. Food Policy, 2011; 36(3):430-437.
  • 5
    Ueland O, Gunnlaugsdottir H, Holm F, Kalogeras N, Leino O, Luteijn JM, Magnússon SH, Odekerken G, Pohjola MV, Tijhuis MJ, Toumisto JT, White BC, Verhagen H. State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Consumer perception. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2012; 50:6776.
  • 6
    Finuance ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. The affect heuristic in judgements of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000; 13:117.
  • 7
    Slovic P, Finuance ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(2):311322.
  • 8
    Alhakami AS, Slovic P. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and the perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 1994; 14:10851096.
  • 9
    Weber EU, Blais AR, Betz N. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 2002; 15:263290.
  • 10
    Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under Risk. Econometrica, 1979; 47(2):263292.
  • 11
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992; 5:297323.
  • 12
    Mishra AK, Goodwin BK. Farm income variability and the supply of off-farm labor. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997; 79:880887.
  • 13
    Pennings JME, Leuthold R. The role of farmers' behavioral attitudes and heterogeneity in futures contracts usage. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2000; 83(4): 9931009.
  • 14
    Pennings JME, Smidts A. Assessing construct validity of risk attitude. Management Science, 2000; 46:13371348.
  • 15
    Pennings JME, Garcia P. Measuring producers' risk preferences: A global risk-attitude construct. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001; 83(4): 9931009.
    Direct Link:
  • 16
    McNamara KT, Weiss C. Farm household income and on- and off-farm diversification. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2005; 37:3748.
  • 17
    Lien G, Hardaker JB, Flaten O. Risk and economic sustainability of crop farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 2000; 94(2):541552.
  • 18
    Franken JRV, Pennings JME, Garcia P. Do transaction costs and risk preferences influence marketing arrangements in the Illinois hog industry? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2009; 34(2):297315.
  • 19
    Hansson H, Lagerkvist CJ. Measuring farmers' preferences for risk: A domain-specific risk preference scale. Journal of Risk Research, 2012; 15(7):737753.
  • 20
    Kahneman R, Sugden D. Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental & Resource Economics, 32:161181.
  • 21
    Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991; 50:179211.
  • 22
    Conner M, Abraham C. Conscientiousness and the theory of planned behavior: Toward a more complete model of the antecedents of intentions and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001; 27(11):15471561.
  • 23
    Kaiser FG, Scheuthle H. Two challenges to moral extension of the theory of planned behaviour: Moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003; 35(5):10331048.
  • 24
    Siegel Levine D, Strube MJ. Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students. Journal of Soical Psychology, 2012; 152(3):308326.
  • 25
    Kahneman D. New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1994; 150:1836.
  • 26
    Harinck F, Van Dijk E, Van Beest I, Mersmann P. When gains loom larger than losses: Reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 2007; 18(12):10991105.
    Direct Link:
  • 27
    DeVellis RF. Scale Development—Theory and Applicatons. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 2003.
  • 28
    Cardello AV. Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: Effects on product liking. Appetite, 2003; 40:217233.
  • 29
    Rositter JR. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2002; 19:305335.
  • 30
    Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP, Yeon LJ. The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 2003; 14(6):615656.
  • 31
    Jarvis CB, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 2003; 30:199218.
  • 32
    Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis—A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2010.