Note: We thank the editor, Conchita D'Ambrosio and two anonymous referees for their useful suggestions. For helpful comments we also thank Bob Breunig, Nicole Fortin, Paul Glewwe, Tue Gorgens, Ben Jann, Thomas Lemieux, Andrew Leigh, Amy Liu, Brain McCaig, Ha Trong Nguyen, Mathias Sinning, and participants in the Micro Brown Bag Seminar and the Second Economic Workshop on Vietnam at the Research School of Economics, the Australian National University, the 6th Australasian Development Economics Workshop at the University of Western Sydney, the 2010 Pacific Conference for Development Economics at the University of Southern California, and the 7th Midwest International Economic Development Conference at the University of Minnesota. Any errors are our own.
Inequality in Vietnamese Urban–Rural Living Standards, 1993–2006
Article first published online: 12 JUN 2013
© 2013 International Association for Research in Income and Wealth
Review of Income and Wealth
How to Cite
Thu Le, H. and Booth, A. L. (2013), Inequality in Vietnamese Urban–Rural Living Standards, 1993–2006. Review of Income and Wealth. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12051
- Article first published online: 12 JUN 2013
- expenditure distribution;
- Oaxaca decomposition;
- unconditional quantile regression;
- urban–rural inequality;
We investigate urban–rural inequality in Vietnam using data from the Vietnam Living Standard Surveys between 1993 and 2006. We find that mean per capita expenditure of urban households is consistently twice as much as that of rural households and that the urban–rural gap monotonically increases from the poorer to the richer groups of the expenditure distribution. To isolate factors contributing to the urban–rural gap, we apply the Oaxaca–Blinder type decomposition to a newly developed unconditional quantile regression method. Factors contributing significantly to the high urban–rural gap include inter-group differences in education, household age structure, labor market activity, geographic location and their related returns, with education playing the most important role. Over the period, consistent with the country's massive rural–urban migration, we find that domestic remittance plays a significant role in shortening the urban–rural expenditure gap in the later years, 2002 and 2006.