SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Berube, D. M. (2006). Nano-hype. The truth behind the nanotechnology buzz. New York: Prometheus Books.
  • Besley, J. (2010). Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. Emerging Health Threats Journal, 3, e8.
  • Bouwmeester, H., Dekkers, S., Noordam, M. Y., Hagens, W. I., Bulder, A. S., de Heer, C., et al. (2009). Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 53, 5262.
  • Burri, R. V., & Bellucci, S. (2008). Public perception of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 387391.
  • Buzby, J. C. (2010). Nanotechnology for food applications: More questions than answers. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44, 528545.
  • Card, J. W., Jonaitis, T. S., Tafazoli, S., & Magnuson, B. A. (2011). An appraisal of the published literature on the safety and toxicity of food-related nanomaterials. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 41(1), 2049.
  • Cardello, A. V. (2003). Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: Effects on product liking. Appetite, 40, 217233.
  • Cardello, A. V., Schutz, H. G., & Lesher, L. (2007). Consumer perceptions of foods processed by innovative and emerging technologies: A conjoint analytic study. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 8, 7383.
  • Carey, M. A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing and interpreting focus group research. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Carey, M. A., & Smith, M. (1994). Capturing the group effect in focus groups: A special concern in analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 123127.
  • Chau, C., Wu, S., & Yen, G. (2007). The development of regulations for food nanotechnology. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 18, 269280.
  • Chaudhry, Q., Scotter, M., Blackburn, J., Ross, B., Boxall, A., Castle, L., et al. (2008). Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Additives and Contaminants. Part A, 25, 241258.
  • Chun, A. L. (2009). Will the public swallow nano food? Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 790791.
  • Cook, A. J., & Fairweather, J. R. (2007). Intentions of New Zealanders to purchase lamb or beef made using nanotechnology. British Food Journal, 109, 675688.
  • Currall, S. C. (2009). Nanotechnology and society: New insights into public perceptions. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 7980.
  • D'Silva, J., & Bowman, D. M. (2010). To label or not to label?—It's more than a nano-sized question. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4, 420427.
  • Department for Environment Food, and Rural Affairs. (2008). UK voluntary reporting scheme for engineered nanoscale materials. London: DEFRA.
  • Dudo, A., Choi, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). Food nanotechnology in the news: Coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade. Appetite, 56, 7889.
  • Falkner, R., Breggin, L., Jaspers, N., Pendergrass, J., & Porter, R. (2009). Consumer labelling of nanomaterials in the EU and US: Convergence or divergence? EERG briefing paper 2009/03. London: Chatham House.
  • Farhang, B. (2009). Nanotechnology and applications in food safety. In G. Barbosa-Cánovas , A. Mortimer , D. Lineback , W. Spiess , K. Buckle , & P. Colonna (Eds.), Global issues in food science and technology (pp. 401410). Burlington, ME: Academic Press.
  • House of Lords, Science and Technology Committee. (2010). Nanotechnologies and food (Volume I. Report). Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldselect/ldsctech/22/22i.pdf
  • Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gastil, J., & Cohen, G. (2009). Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 8791.
  • Köhler, A., & Som, C. (2008). Environmental and health implications of nanotechnology—Have innovators learned the lessons from past experiences? Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 14, 512531.
  • Kuzma, J., & Besley, J. C. (2008). Ethics of risk analysis and regulatory review: From bio- to nanotechnology. Nanoethics, 2, 149162.
  • Kuzma, J., Romanchek, J., & Kokotovich, A. (2008). Upstream oversight assessment for agrifood nanotechnology. Risk Analysis, 28, 10811098.
  • Kuzma, J., & Verhage, P. (2006). Nanotechnology in agriculture and food production. PEN4. Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
  • Macoubrie, J. (2006). Nanotechnology: Public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 221241.
  • Mahler, G. J., Esch, M. G., Tako, E., Southare, T. L., Archer, S. S., Glahn, R. P., et al. (2012). Oral exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles affects iron absorption. Nature Nanotechnology, 7, 264271.
  • Monica, J. C. Jr. (2008). FDA labeling of cosmetics containing nanoscale materials. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 5, 63.
  • Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review Sociology, 22, 129152.
  • Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 319). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Office of Basic Energy Sciences. (2006). The scale of things—Nanometers and more. Office of Science, Department of Energy.
  • Pape, S. (2009). “May contain” labelling: Adequate consumer warning or unnecessarily defensive manufacturer behaviour? Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 165188.
  • Pidgeon, N., Harthorn, B., Bryant, K., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2009). Deliberating the risks of nanotechnology for energy and health applications in the US and UK. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 9598.
  • Pidgeon, N., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007). Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or “upstream engagement?” Health, Risk and Society, 9, 191210.
  • Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN). (2012). Nanotechnology consumer products inventory. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Retrieved from http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/
  • Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. (2004). Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London, UK: Royal Society.
  • Sanguansri, P., & Augustin, M. A. (2006). Nanoscale materials development: A food industry perspective. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 17, 547556.
  • Satterfield, T., Kandlikar, M., Beaudrie, C. E. H., Conti, J., & Harthorn, B. H. (2009). Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 47524758.
  • Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Shih, T., Dalrymple, K. E., & Ho, S. S. (2009). Religious beliefs and public attitudes to nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 9194.
  • Siegrist, M. (2008). Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19, 603608.
  • Siegrist, M. (2010). Predicting the future: Review of public perception studies of nanotechnology. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 16, 837846.
  • Siegrist, M., Cousin, M.-E., Kastenholz, H., & Wiek, A. (2007). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust. Appetite, 49, 459466.
  • Siegrist, M., & Keller, C. (2011). Labeling of nanotechnology consumer products can influence risk and benefit perceptions. Risk Analysis, 31, 17621769.
  • Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., & Kastenholz, H. (2009). Acceptance of nanotechnology foods: A conjoint study examining consumers' willingness to buy. British Food Journal, 111, 660668.
  • Stokes, E. (2009). Regulating nanotechnologies: Sizing up the options. Legal Studies, 29, 281304.
  • Throne-Holst, H., & Strandbakken, P. (2009). Nobody told me I was a nano-consumer: How nanotechnologies might challenge the notion of consumer rights. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 393402.
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007). Nanotechnology task force report. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/Nanotechnology/UCM2006659.htm
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2012). Guidance for industry: Assessing the effects of significant manufacturing process changes, including emerging technologies, on the safety and regulatory status of food ingredients and food contact substances, including food ingredients that are color additives. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/IngredientsAdditivesGRASPackaging/ucm300661.htm
  • Yawson, R. M., & Kuzma, J. (2010). Systems mapping of consumer acceptance of agrifood nanotechnology. Journal of Consumer Policy, 33, 299322.