Funds from a Fulbright fellowship to the senior author and two grants from the National Science Foundation (SBR9618371 and CNH10009499) facilitated this research. Dolores Quesada Tenesaca, Gerardo Caivinagua, Rafael Machingiashi, Diane Bates, Diana Burbano, and Carlos Mena of the Universidad San Francisco de Quito made extremely valuable contributions to the collection of the field data. Amy Lerner made very useful comments on an earlier version of this article. Address correspondence to Thomas K. Rudel, Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Amerindian Livelihoods, Outside Interventions, and Poverty Traps in the Ecuadorian Amazon†
Version of Record online: 11 APR 2013
Copyright © 2013, by the Rural Sociological Society
Volume 78, Issue 2, pages 167–185, June 2013
How to Cite
Rudel, T. K., Katan, T. and Horowitz, B. (2013), Amerindian Livelihoods, Outside Interventions, and Poverty Traps in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Rural Sociology, 78: 167–185. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12009
- Issue online: 23 MAY 2013
- Version of Record online: 11 APR 2013
- National Science Foundation. Grant Numbers: SBR9618371, CNH10009499
Recent efforts to explain the persistence of rural poverty have made frequent use of the concept of poverty traps, understood as self-reinforcing poverty. The dynamic dimension of the poverty trap concept makes it a potentially useful tool for understanding conditions of persistent poverty, especially in circumstances where outside interventions “shock” the system with the intention of ending poverty and disadvantage. This article describes one such effort among a populous group of lowland Amerindians, the Shuar of Ecuador's Amazon region. Three small household surveys conducted at different times during the last 25 years suggest that the Shuar, despite having obtained access to land through a combination of their own efforts and outside interventions, have become enmeshed in a natural-resource-degrading poverty trap. Mestizos with land in the same region avoided this trap only by emigrating in large numbers. Secure access to land did not prevent the emergence of a poverty trap among the Shuar in large part because smallholders in Latin America faced difficult macrosociological and ecological conditions during the last decades of the twentieth century.