• 1
    Barthold M. Standardizing electronic nursing documentation. Nurs Manage 2009; 40: 1517.
  • 2
    Thoroddsen A, Ehrenberg A, Sermeus W, Saranto K. A survey of nursing documentation, terminologies and standards in European countries. In Advancing Global Health Through Informatics (Abbott PA, Hullin C, Bandara S, Nagle L, Newbold SK eds), Proceedings of NI2012. (last accessed 07 January 2013).
  • 3
    Henry SB, Warren JJ, Lange L, Button P. A review of major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they have the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 3218.
  • 4
    Henry SB, Warren JJ, Zielstorff RD. Nursing data, classification systems, and quality indicators: what every HIM professional needs to know. J AHIMA 1998; 69: 4854; quiz 55–6.
  • 5
    Westra BL, Subramanian A, Hart CM, Matney SA, Wilson PS, Huff SM, Huber DL, Delaney CW. Achieving “meaningful use” of electronic health records through the integration of the nursing management minimum data set. J Nurs Adm 2010; 40: 33643.
  • 6
    Westra BL, Delaney CW, Konicek D, Keenan G. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nurs Outlook 2008; 56: 25866.e1.
  • 7
    Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, Hashmat B, Koppel R, Overhage JM, Payne TH, Rosenbloom ST, Weaver C, Zhang J. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 17. Published online January 25, 2013, (last accessed 12 February 2013).
  • 8
    Ammenwerth E, Buchauer A, Haux R. A requirements index for information processing in hospitals. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 2828.
  • 9
    Hübner U, Ammenwerth E, Flemming D, Schaubmayr C, Sellemann B. IT adoption of clinical information systems in Austrian and German hospitals: results of a comparative survey with a focus on nursing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010; 10: 8.
  • 10
    Ammenwerth E, Rauchegger F, Ehlers F, Hirsch B, Schaubmayr C. Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: an evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80: 2538.
  • 11
    Allan J, Englebright J. Patient-centered documentation: an effective and efficient use of clinical information systems. J Nurs Adm 2000; 30: 9095.
  • 12
    Axelsson L, Björvell C, Mattiasson AC, Randers I. Swedish Registered Nurses' incentives to use nursing diagnoses in clinical practice. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15: 93645.
  • 13
    Warren JJ, Hoskins LM. The development of NANDA's nursing diagnosis taxonomy. Nurs Diagn 1990; 1: 1628.
  • 14
    NANDA International. Defining the Knowledge of Nursing, (last accessed 15 January 2013).
  • 15
    McCloskey J, Bulechek G. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), 3rd edn. 2000, Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, MO.
  • 16
    Johnson M, Maas M, Morehead S. Nursing Outcomes Classification, 2nd edn. 2000, Mosby, St. Louis, MO.
  • 17
    Müller-Staub M, Lavin MA, Needham I, van Achterberg T. Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes – application and impact on nursing practice: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56: 51431.
  • 18
    Bagraith KS, Strong J. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) can be used to describe multidisciplinary clinical assessments of people with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Clin Rheumatol 2013; 32: 3839.
  • 19
    Steel EJ, Gelderblom GJ, de Witte LP. The role of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and quality criteria for improving assistive technology service delivery in Europe. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 91(13 Suppl 1): S5561.
  • 20
    Florin J, Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M, Björvell C. A comparison between the VIPS model and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the health care record. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82: 10817.
  • 21
    Saba VK, Zuckerman AE. A new home health classification method. Caring 1992; 11: 2734.
  • 22
    Saba VK. Nursing classifications: Home Health Care Classification System (HHCC): an overview. Online J Issues Nurs 2002; 7: 9.
  • 23
    Saba VK. Nursing information technology: classifications and management. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 65: 2144.
  • 24
    Saba VK, Feeg V, Konicek D. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) system charting model. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 122: 1011.
  • 25
    Saba V. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Manual; A Guide to Nursing Documentation. 2007, Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA.
  • 26
    Saba V. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System, Version 2.5. User's Guide, 2nd edn. 2012, Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA.
  • 27
    Coenen A. The International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) programme: advancing a unifying framework for nursing. Online J Issues Nurs 2003; 8: 2.
  • 28
    Westra BL, Oancea C, Savik K, Marek KD. The feasibility of integrating the Omaha System data across home care agencies and vendors. Comput Inform Nurs 2010; 28: 16271.
  • 29
    Bakken S, Lucero R, Yoon S, Hardiker N. Implications for nursing research and generation of evidence. In Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing Informatics: Concepts and Applications (Cashin A, Cook R eds), 2011, Medical Information Science Reference, Hershey, New York, NY, USA, 11327.
  • 30
    Häyrinen K, Lammintakanen J, Saranto K. Evaluation of electronic nursing documentation–nursing process model and standardized terminologies as keys to visible and transparent nursing. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79: 55464.
  • 31
    Ehnfors M, Thorell-Ekstrand I, Ehrenberg A. Towards basic nursing information in patient records. Vård Nord Utveckl Forsk 1991; 11: 1231.
  • 32
    Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M, Thorell-Ekstrand I. Nursing documentation in patient records: experience of the use of the VIPS model. J Adv Nurs 1996; 24: 85367.
  • 33
    Ensio A, Saranto K, Ikonen H, Iivari A. The national evaluation of standardized terminology. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 122: 74952.
  • 34
    Ensio A, Kinnunen UM, Mykkänen M. Finnish care classification for nursing documentation. In Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System, Version 2.5, User's Guide, 2nd edn (Saba Virginia K ed.), 2012, Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, 5861.
  • 35
    Clancy TR, Delaney CW, Morrison B, Gunn JK. The benefits of standardized nursing languages in complex adaptive systems such as hospitals. J Nurs Adm 2006; 36: 42634.
  • 36
    Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. A viewpoint on evidence-based health informatics, based on a pilot survey on evaluation studies in health care informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 36871.
  • 37
    Saranto K, Kinnunen UM. Evaluating nursing documentation – research designs and methods: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 46476.
  • 38
    Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77: 291304.
  • 39
    Urquhart C, Currell R, Grant MJ, Hardiker NR. Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD002099.
  • 40
    Sweeney P. The effects of information technology on perioperative nursing. AORN J 2010; 92: 52840; quiz 541–3.
  • 41
    Kelley TF, Brandon DH, Docherty SL. Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. J Nurs Scholarsh 2011; 43: 15462.
  • 42
    Wang N, Hailey D, Yu P. Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67: 185875.
  • 43
    Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007; 7: 16.
  • 44
    Higgins JPT, Green S. (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. 2011, [updated March 2011]. Julian PT Higgins and Sally Green ed., The Cochrane Collaboration, (last accessed 24 January 2013)
  • 45
    Hyppönen H, Saranto K, Vuokko R, Mäkelä-Bengs P, Doupi P, Lindqvist M, Mäkelä M. Impacts of structuring the electronic health record: a systematic review protocol and results of previous reviews. Int J Med Inform 2013. In press.
  • 46
    Ahlenius H. Country Income Groups (World Bank Classification). 2009, (last accessed 15 January 2013).
  • 47
    Ammenwerth E, Eichstadter R, Haux R, Pohl U, Rebel S, Ziegler S. A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40: 6168.
  • 48
    Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 6984.
  • 49
    Annersten Gershater M, Pilhammar E, Roijer CA. Documentation of diabetes care in home nursing service in a Swedish municipality: a cross-sectional study on nurses' documentation. Scand J Caring Sci 2011; 25: 2206.
  • 50
    Booyens SW, Uys LR. The quality of nursing documentation in some private and provincial hospitals in the Cape Peninsula and the PWV-area. Curationis 1989; 12: 2628.
  • 51
    Crist-Grundman D, Douglas K, Kern V, Gregory J, Switzer V. Evaluating the impact of structured text and templates in ambulatory nursing. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995; 1: 7126.
  • 52
    Dahm MF, Wadensten B. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records–a questionnaire study. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 213745.
  • 53
    Edell-Gustafsson U, Aren C, Hamrin E, Hetta J. Nurses' notes on sleep patterns in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a retrospective evaluation of patient records. J Adv Nurs 1994; 20: 3316.
  • 54
    Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. Older patients with chronic heart failure within Swedish community health care: a record review of nursing assessments and interventions. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13: 9096.
  • 55
    Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M. Patient problems, needs, and nursing diagnoses in Swedish nursing home records. Nurs Diagn 1999; 10: 6576.
  • 56
    Gjevjon ER, Helleso R. The quality of home care nurses' documentation in new electronic patient records. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 1008.
  • 57
    Griffiths P, Debbage S, Smith A. A comprehensive audit of nursing record keeping practice. Br J Nurs 2007; 16: 13247.
  • 58
    Hyun S, Johnson SB, Bakken S. Exploring the ability of natural language processing to extract data from nursing narratives. Comput Inform Nurs 2009; 27: 21525.
  • 59
    Jackson SE. The efficacy of an educational intervention on documentation of pain management for the elderly patient with a hip fracture in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2010; 36: 1015.
  • 60
    Kärkkainen O, Eriksson K. Evaluation of patient records as part of developing a nursing care classification. J Clin Nurs 2003; 12: 198205.
  • 61
    Korst LM, Eusebio-Angeja AC, Chamorro T, Aydin CE, Gregory KD. Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record. J Nurs Adm 2003; 33: 2430.
  • 62
    Kossman SP, Scheidenhelm SL. Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. Comput Inform Nurs 2008; 26: 6977.
  • 63
    Lee TT. Nursing diagnoses: factors affecting their use in charting standardized care plans. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 6407.
  • 64
    Lee TT, Chang PC. Standardized care plans: experiences of nurses in Taiwan. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13: 3340.
  • 65
    Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs 2004; 22: 33744.
  • 66
    Paans W, Sermeus W, Nieweg RMB, van der Schans CP. Prevalence of accurate nursing documentation in patient records. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66: 24819.
  • 67
    Scharf L. Revising nursing documentation to meet patient outcomes. Nurs Manage 1997; 28: 3839.
  • 68
    Stokke TA, Kalfoss MH. Structure and content in Norwegian nursing care documentation. Scand J Caring Sci 1999; 13: 1825.
  • 69
    Uys LR, Booyens SW. Standards for nursing documentation in general hospitals in South Africa. Curationis 1989; 12: 2931.
  • 70
    Talmon J, Ammenwerth E, Brender J, de Keizer N, Nykänen P, Rigby M. STARE-HI–Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 19.
  • 71
    Björvell C, Wredling R, Thorell-Ekstrand I. Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: effects of a comprehensive intervention. Scand J Caring Sci 2002; 16: 3442.
  • 72
    Darmer MR, Ankersen L, Nielsen BG, Landberger G, Lippert E, Egerod I. Nursing documentation audit–the effect of a VIPS implementation programme in Denmark. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15: 52534.
  • 73
    Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M. Patient records in nursing homes: effects of training on content and comprehensiveness. Scand J Caring Sci 1999; 13: 7282.
  • 74
    Ehrenberg A, Birgersson C. Nursing documentation of leg ulcers: adherence to clinical guidelines in a Swedish primary health care district. Scand J Caring Sci 2003; 17: 27884.
  • 75
    Darmer MR, Ankersen L, Nielsen BG, Landberger G, Lippert E, Egerod I. The effect of a VIPS implementation programme on nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards documentation. Scand J Caring Sci 2004; 18: 32532.
  • 76
    Hellesø R. Information handling in the nursing discharge note. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15: 1121.
  • 77
    Törnvall E, Wahren LK, Wilhelmsson S. Advancing nursing documentation–an intervention study using patients with leg ulcer as an example. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 60517.
  • 78
    Bergh AL, Bergh CH, Friberg F. How do nurses record pedagogical activities? Nurses' documentation in patient records in a cardiac rehabilitation unit for patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 1898907.
  • 79
    Gunningberg L, Fogelberg-Dahm M, Ehrenberg A. Improved quality and comprehensiveness in nursing documentation of pressure ulcers after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18: 155764.
  • 80
    Nilsson U, Willman A. Evaluation of nursing documentation. A comparative study using the instruments NoGA and Cat-ch-ing after an educational intervention. Scand J Caring Sci 2000; 14: 199206.
  • 81
    Rykkje L. Implementing electronic patient record and VIPS in medical hospital wards: evaluating change in quantity and quality of nursing documentation by using the audit instrument Cat-ch-Ing. Vård i Norden 2009; 29: 913.
  • 82
    Björvell C, Wredling R, Thorell-Ekstrand I. Prerequisites and consequences of nursing documentation in patient records as perceived by a group of Registered Nurses. J Clin Nurs 2003; 12: 20614.
  • 83
    Björvell C, Wredling R, Thorell-Ekstrand I. Experiences of using the VIPS model for nursing documentation: a focus group study [corrected]. J Adv Nurs 2003; 43: 40210.
  • 84
    Törnvall E, Wilhelmsson S, Wahren LK. Electronic nursing documentation in primary health care. Scand J Caring Sci 2004; 18: 3107.
  • 85
    Greener D. Development and validation of the Nurse-Midwifery Clinical Data Set. J Nurse Midwifery 1991; 36: 17480.
  • 86
    Örlygsdóttir B. Use of NIDSEC-compliant CIS in community-based nursing-directed prenatal care to determine support of Nursing Minimum Data Set objectives. Comput Inform Nurs 2007; 25: 28393.
  • 87
    Cho I, Park HA. Evaluation of the expressiveness of an ICNP-based nursing data dictionary in a computerized nursing record system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 45664.
  • 88
    Cho I, Park HA. Development and evaluation of a terminology-based electronic nursing record system. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36: 30412.
  • 89
    Kim Y, Park H. Analysis of nursing records of cardiac-surgery patients based on the nursing process and focusing on nursing outcomes. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74: 9529.
  • 90
    Feeg VD, Saba VK, Feeg AN. Testing a bedside personal computer Clinical Care Classification System for nursing students using Microsoft Access. Comput Inform Nurs 2008; 26: 33949.
  • 91
    Hannah KJ, White PA, Nagle LM, Pringle DM. Standardizing nursing information in Canada for inclusion in electronic health records: C-HOBIC. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 52430.
  • 92
    Bowles KH. Application of the Omaha System in acute care. Res Nurs Health 2000; 23: 93105.
  • 93
    Smith K, Smith V, Krugman M, Oman K. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Comput Inform Nurs 2005; 23: 1328.
  • 94
    Burkhart L, Androwich I. Measuring the domain completeness of the Nursing Interventions Classification in parish nurse documentation. Comput Inform Nurs 2004; 22: 7282.
  • 95
    Thoroddsen A. Applicability of the Nursing Interventions Classification to describe nursing. Scand J Caring Sci 2005; 19: 12839.
  • 96
    Larrabee JH, Boldreghini S, Elder-Sorrells K, Turner ZM, Wender RG, Hart JM, Lenzi PS. Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Comput Nurs 2001; 19: 5665.
  • 97
    Klehr J, Hafner J, Spelz LM, Steen S, Weaver K. Implementation of standardized nomenclature in the electronic medical record. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2009; 20: 16980.
  • 98
    Lunney M, Parker L, Fiore L, Cavendish R, Pulcini J. Feasibility of studying the effects of using NANDA, NIC, and NOC on nurses' power and children's outcomes. Comput Inform Nurs 2004; 22: 31625.
  • 99
    Daly JM, Buckwalter K, Maas M. Written and computerized care plans. Organizational processes and effect on patient outcomes. J Gerontol Nurs 2002; 28: 1423.
  • 100
    Müller-Staub M. Preparing nurses to use standardized nursing language in the electronic health record. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 146: 33741.
  • 101
    Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively: cluster randomized trial. J Adv Nurs 2008; 63: 291301.
  • 102
    Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Improved quality of nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes implementation study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2007; 18: 517.
  • 103
    Thoroddsen A, Ehnfors M. Putting policy into practice: pre- and posttests of implementing standardized languages for nursing documentation. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 182638.
  • 104
    Figoski M, Downey J. Facility charging and Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC): the new dynamic duo. Nurs Econ 2006; 24: 10211, 115.
  • 105
    Keenan G, Barkauskas V, Stocker J, Johnson M, Maas M, Moorhead S, Reed D. Establishing the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of NOC in an adult care nurse practitioner setting. Outcomes Manag 2003; 7: 7483.
  • 106
    Maas M, Johnson M, Moorhead S, Reed D, Sweeney S. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of nursing outcomes classification patient outcomes and measures. J Nurs Meas 2003; 11: 97117.
  • 107
    Keenan G, Stocker J, Barkauskas V, Johnson M, Maas M, Moorhead S, Reed D. Assessing the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of nursing outcomes classification in home care settings. J Nurs Meas 2003; 11: 13555.
  • 108
    Moorhead S, Johnson M, Maas M, Reed D. Testing the nursing outcomes classification in three clinical units in a community hospital. J Nurs Meas 2003; 11: 17181.
  • 109
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097.
  • 110
    WHO. Development of Designs and Documentation of Nursing Process. 1977, Report on a Technical Advisory group. WHO, Copenhagen.
  • 111
    Yura H, Walsh M. The Nursing Process: Assessing, Planning, Implementing, Evaluating, 3rd edn. 1978, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY, USA.
  • 112
    Henry BS, Mead CN. Nursing classification systems necessary but not sufficient for representing “what nurses do” for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 22232.
  • 113
    Imel M, Campbell JR. Mapping From a Clinical Terminology to a Classification. 2003, Ahima's 75th Anniversary National Convention and Exhibit Proceedings, October 2003. American Health Information Management Association, (last accessed 15 January 2013).
  • 114
    So EY, Park HA. Exploring the possibility of information sharing between the medical and nursing domains by mapping medical records to SNOMED CT and ICNP. Healthc Inform Res 2011; 17: 15661.
  • 115
    Kim TY, Coenen A, Hardiker N. Semantic mappings and locality of nursing diagnostic concepts in UMLS. J Biomed Inform 2012; 45: 93100.
  • 116
    Hyun S, Park HA. Cross-mapping the ICNP with NANDA, HHCC, Omaha System and NIC for unified nursing language system development. International Classification for Nursing Practice. International Council of Nurses. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Home Health Care Classification. Nursing Interventions Classification. Int Nurs Rev 2002; 49: 99110.
  • 117
    Park HA, Lundberg C, Coenen A, Konicek D. Evaluation of the content coverage of SNOMED CT representing ICNP seven-axis version 1 concepts. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50: 4728.
  • 118
    Werley H, Lang N (eds). Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS), 1988, Springer, New York, USA.
  • 119
    Weiskopf N, Weng C. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20: 14451.
  • 120
    Pabst MK, Scherubel JC, Minnick AF. The impact of computerized documentation on nurses' use of time. Comput Nurs 1996; 14: 2530.
  • 121
    Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 50516.