*M. Devereux thanks the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the Bank of Canada, and the Royal Bank of Canada for financial support. The opinions in this paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by the Bank of Canada or the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). This paper was initiated when M. Devereux was visiting the Hong Kong office of the BIS. We thank three anonymous referees for extensive comments on a previous draft.
Capital Controls, Global Liquidity Traps, and the International Policy Trilemma*
Article first published online: 30 DEC 2013
© The editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2013.
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics
Volume 116, Issue 1, pages 158–189, January 2014
How to Cite
Devereux, M. B. and Yetman, J. (2014), Capital Controls, Global Liquidity Traps, and the International Policy Trilemma. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116: 158–189. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12040
- Issue published online: 30 DEC 2013
- Article first published online: 30 DEC 2013
- Financial openness;
- international transmission;
- zero lower bound;
The zero bound on interest rates introduces a new dimension to the trilemma in international policy. The openness of the international financial market might render monetary policy ineffective, even within a system of fully flexible exchange rates, because shocks that lead to a liquidity trap in one country are propagated through financial markets to other countries. However, the effectiveness of monetary policy can be restored by the imposition of capital controls. We derive the optimal response of monetary policy to a global liquidity trap in the presence of capital controls. We show that, even though capital controls might facilitate effective monetary policy, capital controls are not generally desirable in terms of welfare.