Presented at the American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, October 31, 2011. The work presented here was supported in part (M. Allen) by the Department of Veterans Affairs but does not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government. The authors wish to thank Anna Brugioni, Emily Caldes, Eamon Callison, Kim Jordan, and Drs. Robert Werthwein, Kenyetta Jones, Fernando Daniels, and Jessica Wyant for their assistance with this study.
Screening for Suicidal Ideation and Attempts among Emergency Department Medical Patients: Instrument and Results from the Psychiatric Emergency Research Collaboration
Article first published online: 16 FEB 2013
© 2013 The American Association of Suicidology
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Volume 43, Issue 3, pages 313–323, June 2013
How to Cite
Allen, M. H., Abar, B. W., McCormick, M., Barnes, D. H., Haukoos, J., Garmel, G. M. and Boudreaux, E. D. (2013), Screening for Suicidal Ideation and Attempts among Emergency Department Medical Patients: Instrument and Results from the Psychiatric Emergency Research Collaboration. Suicide and Life-Threat Behavi, 43: 313–323. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12018
- Issue published online: 10 JUN 2013
- Article first published online: 16 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 4 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Received: 11 JUN 2012
Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goal 15 calls for organizations “to identify patients at risk for suicide.” Overt suicidal behavior accounts for 0.6% of emergency department (ED) visits, but incidental suicidal ideation is found in 3%–11.6%. This is the first multicenter study of suicide screening in EDs. Of 2,243 patients in six diverse emergency settings, 1,068 (47.7%) were screened with a brief instrument. Depression was endorsed by 369 (34.5%); passive suicidal ideation by 79 (7.3%); and active suicidal ideation by 24 (2.3%). One hundred thirty-seven (12.8%) reported prior attempts, including 35 (3.3%) with current suicidal ideation. Almost half of those with current ideation had a prior attempt (43.8%) versus those without current ideation, 10.3%, χ2 (1) = 75.59, p < .001. Twenty cases (25%) were admitted to medical services, but only 10 (12.5%) received mental health assessment; none were admitted directly to a psychiatry service. The prevalence of suicidal ideation here is similar to previous studies but the frequency of prior attempts has not been reported. The 35 cases with current ideation and prior attempt are at risk. As they did not present psychiatrically, they would likely have gone undetected. Despite reporting these cases to clinical staff, few received risk assessment.