SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, S., T. Iversen and D. Soskice (2011). Informal Social Networks and Rational Voting. British Journal of Political Science 41(2): 229257.
  • Almond, G. and S. Verba (1963). The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton/NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Anderson, C. and A. Paskeviciute. (2005). Macro-Politics and Micro-Behavior. Mainstream Politics and the Frequency of Political Discussion in Contemporary Democracies. In Zuckerman, A. (ed.), The Social Logic of Politics. Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press (228248).
  • Bächtiger, A. and S. Pedrini (2010). Dissecting Deliberative Democracy. A Review of Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Findings. In Wolf, M., L. Morales and K. Ikeda (eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective. London/New York: Routledge (925).
  • Barabas, J. (2004). How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions. The American Political Science Review 98(4): 687701.
  • Barnes, S. and M. Kaase (1979). Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills [u.a.]: Sage.
  • Beck, P. (2002). Encouraging Political Defection: The Role of Personal Discussion Networks in Partisan Desertions to the Opposition Party and Perot Votes in 1992. Political Behavior 24(4): 309337.
  • Bello, J. (2012). The Dark Side of Disagreement? Revisiting the Effect of Disagreement on Political Participation. Electoral Studies 31(4): 782795.
  • Bennett, S., B. Fisher and D. Resnick (1995). Political Conversations in the United States: Who Talk to Whom, Why and Why Not. The American Review of Politics 16: 277298.
  • Bennett, S.E., R. Lickinger and S. Rhine (2000). Political Talk over Here, over There, over Time. British Journal of Political Science 30(1): 99119.
  • Berelson, B.R., P.F. Lazarsfeld and W.N. McPhee (1954). Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Campus, D., G. Pasquino and C. Vaccari (2008). Social Networks, Political Discussion, and Voting in Italy: A Study of the 2006 Election. Political Communication 25(4): 423444.
  • Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6(1): 307326.
  • Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In Hamlin, A. and P. Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity. Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1834).
  • Conover, P.J. and D.D. Searing (2005). Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk' in the Deliberative System. Acta Politica 40(3): 269283.
  • Conover, P.J., D.D. Searing and I.M. Crewe (2002). The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion. British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 2162.
  • Dahl, R. (1998). On Democracy. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
  • Delli Carpini, M., F. Cook and L. Jacobs (2004). Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7(3): 315344.
  • Deutsch, K. (1963). The Nerves of Government. Models of Political Communication and Control. New York: Free Press.
  • Downs, A. (1965). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Boston: Addison Wesley.
  • Druckman, J. and K. Nelson (2003). Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 47(4): 729745.
  • Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Erisen, E. and C. Erisen (2012). The Effect of Social Networks on the Quality of Political Thinking. Political Psychology 33(6): 839865.
  • Eveland, W., A. Hayes, D. Shah and N. Kwak (2005). Understanding the Relationship between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data. Political Communication 22(4): 423446.
  • Eveland, W.P., A. Morey and M. Hutchens (2011). Beyond Deliberation: New Directions for the Study of Informal Political Conversation from a Communication Perspective. Journal of Communication 61(6): 10821103.
  • Eveland, W.P., M. Hutchens and A. Morey (2012). Social Networks and Political Knowledge. In Semetko, H.A. and M. Scammell (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication. Los Angeles: Sage (240252).
  • Eveland, W.P. and T. Thomson (2006). Is It Talking, Thinking, or Both? A Lagged Dependent Variable Model of Discussion Effects on Political Knowledge. Journal of Communication 56(3): 523542.
  • Eveland, W.P.J. and M. Hively (2009). Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation. Journal of Communication 59(2): 205224.
  • Faas, T. and R. Schmitt-Beck. (2010). Voters' Political Conversations During the 2005 German Parliamentary Election Campaign. In Wolf, M., L. Morales and K. Ikeda (eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective. London/New York: Routledge (99116).
  • Fishkin, J. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation. New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
  • Fowler, J. (2005). Turnout in a Small World. In Zuckerman, A. (ed.), The Social Logic of Politics. Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press (269287).
  • Gamson, W. (1992). Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gastil, J. (2008). Political Communication and Deliberation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Gastil, J., L. Black and K. Moscovitz (2008). Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups. Political Communication 25(1): 2346.
  • Gerber, A., D. Green and C. Larimer (2008). Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 102(1): 3348.
  • Gerber, A.S., G. Huber, D. Doherty and C. Dowling (2012). Disagreement and the Avoidance of Political Discussion: Aggregate Relationships and Differences across Personality Traits. American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 849874.
  • Gerber, A.S., G. Huber, D. Doherty, C. Dowling and S. Hill (2013). Who Wants to Discuss Vote Choices with Others? Polarization in Preferences for Deliberation. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(2): 474496.
  • Gerhards, J. and F. Neidhardt (1991). Strukturen Und Funktionen Moderner Öffentlichkeit: Fragestellungen Und Ansätze. In Müller-Doohm, S. and K. Neumann-Braun (eds.), Öffentlichkeit - Kultur - Massenkommunikation. Oldenburg: BIS Verlag (3189).
  • Gibson, J. (2001). Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for Consolidating Russia's Democratic Transition. American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 5169.
  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(3): 13601380.
  • Gumpert, G. and R. Cathcart (1986). Inter/Media. Interpersonal Communication in a Media World. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1994). Three Normative Models of Democracy. Constellations 1(1): 110.
  • Hardy, B. and D. Scheufele (2005). Examining Differential Gains from Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions. Journal of Communication 55(1): 7184.
  • Hayes, A., C. Glynn and J. Shanahan (2005). Willingness to Self-Censor: A Construct and Measurement Tool for Public Opinion Research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(3): 298323.
  • Hibbing, M., M. Ritchie and M. Anderson (2011). Personality and Political Discussion. Political Behavior 33(4): 601624.
  • Holbert, R., W. Benoit, G. Hansen and W. Wen (2002). The Role of Communication in the Formation of an Issue-Based Citizenry. Communication Monographs 69(4): 296310.
  • Hopmann, D. (2012). The Consequences of Political Disagreement in Interpersonal Communication: New Insights from a Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 51(2): 265287.
  • Huckfeldt, R., K. Ikeda and F. Pappi (2005). Patterns of Disagreement in Democratic Politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States. American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 497514.
  • Huckfeldt, R., P. Johnson and J. Sprague (2004a). Political Disagreement. The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huckfeldt, R., J. der e Mendez and T. Osborn (2004b). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. Political Psychology 25(1): 6595.
  • Huckfeldt, R. and J. Sprague (1995). Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iglic, H. and J. Font Fábregas (2007). Social Networks. In: van Deth, J., J. Montero A. Westholm (eds.), Citizenship and Involvement in Europe Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Routledge (188218).
  • Ikeda, K. and S. Richey (2009). The Impact of Diversity in Informal Social Networks on Tolerance in Japan. British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 655668.
  • Jackman, S. and P. Sniderman (2006). The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments. Journal of Politics 68(2): 272283.
  • Jacobs, L., F. Cook and M. Carpini (2009). Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Johnston, R. and C. Pattie (2006). Putting Voters in Their Place. Geography and Elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kaase, M. (1986). Massenkommunikation und Politischer Prozeß. In: Kaase, M. (ed.), Politische Wissenschaft Und Politische Ordnung. Opladen:Westdeutscher Verlag (357374).
  • Karpowitz, C. and T. Mendelberg (2011). An Experimental Approach to Citizen Deliberation. In: Druckman, J., D. Green, J. Kuklinski and A. Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (258272).
  • Kenny, C. (1998). The Behavioral Consequences of Political Discussion: Another Look at Discussant Effects on Vote Choice. Journal of Politics 60(1): 231244.
  • Kenny, C. (1992). Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment. American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 259267.
  • Kenny, C.B. (1993). The Mircoenvironment of Political Participation. American Politics Quarterly 21(2): 223238.
  • Kenny, C.B. (1994). The Microenvironment of Attitude Change. Journal of Politics 56(3): 715728.
  • Kim, J., R. Wyatt and E. Katz (1999). News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy. Political Communication 16(4): 361385.
  • Klofstad, C. (2011). Civic Talk. Peers Politics, and the Future of Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Klofstad, C., A. Sokhey and S. McClurg (2013). Disagreeing About Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 120134.
  • Knoke, D. (1990). Networks of Political Action: Toward Theory Construction. Social Forces 68(4): 10411063.
  • Kraft, P. and R. Schmitt-Beck (2013). Helfen politische Gespräche, “korrekt” zu Wählen? Eine Analyse zur Bundestagswahl 2009. In Keil, S. and S. Thaidigsmann (eds.), Zivile Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie. Aktuelle Ergebnisse Der Empirischen Politikforschung. Festschrift für Oscar W. Gabriel zum 65. Geburtstag. Wiesbaden: Springer (117138).
  • Kwak, N., A. Williams, X. Wang and H. Lee (2005). Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationship between Structural Features and Discussion Engagement. Communication Research 21(2): 87111.
  • Lake, R. and R. Huckfeldt (1998). Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation. Political Psychology 19(3): 567584.
  • Lane, R.E. (1959). Political Life. Why and How People Get Involved in Politics. New York: Free Press.
  • Lazarsfeld, P., B. Berelson and H. Gaudet (1968). The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York/London: Columbia University Press.
  • Lazer, D., B. Rubineau, C. Chetkovich, N. Katz and M. Neblo (2010). The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes. Political Communication 27(3): 248274.
  • Leighley, J. (1990). Social Interaction and Contextual Influence on Political Participation. American Politics Quarterly 18(4): 459475.
  • Levitan, L. and P. Visser (2009). Social Network Composition and Attitude Strength: Exploring the Dynamics within Newly Formed Social Networks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(5): 10571067.
  • Lup, O. (2010). The Role of Political Discussion in Developing Democracies. Evidence from Hungary. In Wolf, M., L. Morales and K. Ikeda (eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective. London/New York: Routledge (183200).
  • MacKuen, M. (1990). Speaking of Politics: Individual Conversational Choice, Public Opinion, and the Prospects for Deliberative Democracy. In Ferejohn, J. and J. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press (5999).
  • Mackuen, M. and C. Brown (1987). Political Context and Attitude Change. American Political Science Review 81(2): 471490.
  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System. In Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press (211242).
  • Marsden, P. (1987). Core Discussion Networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 52(1): 122131.
  • McClurg, S. (2011). Porous Networks and Overlapping Contexts. Methodological Challenges in the Study of Social Communication and Political Behavior. In Bucy, E. P. and R. L. Holbert (eds.), The Sourcebook for Political Communication Reserach. Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques. New York/London: Routledge (346364).
  • McClurg, S. (2003). Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation. Political Research Quarterly 56(4): 449464.
  • Mcclurg, S.D. (2006). The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 737754.
  • McLeod, J., M. Sotirovic and R. Holbert (1998). Values as Sociotropic Judgments Influencing Communication Patterns. Communication Research 25(5): 453485.
  • McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and J.M. Cook (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415444.
  • Milbrath, L. (1966). Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?. Chicago: MacNally.
  • Morales, L. (2010). Getting a Single Message? The Impact of Homogeneous Political Communication Contexts in Spain in a Comparative Perspective. In Wolf, M., L. Morales and K. Ikeda (eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective. London/New York: Routledge (201222).
  • Morey, A., W. Eveland and M. Hutchens (2012). The “Who” Matters: Types of Interpersonal Relationships and Avoidance of Political Disagreement. Political Communication 29(1): 86103.
  • Mutz, D. (2002a). The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 838855.
  • Mutz, D. (2002b). Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice. American Political Science Review 96(4): 111126.
  • Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the Other Side. Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mutz, D. and J. Mondak (2006). The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse. Journal of Politics 68(1): 140155.
  • Nickerson, D. (2008). Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments. American Political Science Review 102(1): 4957.
  • Niedermayer, O. (2005). Bürger Und Politik: Politische Orientierungen Und Verhaltensweisen Der Deutschen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Nir, L. (2011). Disagreement and Opposition in Social Networks: Does Disagreement Discourage Turnout? Political Studies 59(3): 674692.
  • Nir, L. (2012). Cross-National Differences in Political Discussion: Can Political Systems Narrow Deliberation Gaps? Journal of Communication 62(3): 553570.
  • Nisbet, M., D. Brossard and A. Kroepsch (2003). Framing Science - the Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics. Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 8(2): 3670.
  • Nisbet, M.N. and D. Scheufele (2004). Political Talk as a Catalyst for Online Citizenship. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81(4): 877896.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups. New Media & Society 6(2): 259283.
  • Parker, S., G. Parker and J. McCann (2008). Opinion Taking within Friendship Networks. American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 412420.
  • Parkinson, J. and J. Mansbridge (2012) Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pattie, C. and R. Johnston (2002). Political Talk and Voting: Does It Matter to Whom One Talks? Environment and Planning 34(6): 11131135.
  • Pattie, C. and R. Johnston (2008). It's Good to Talk: Talk, Disagreement and Tolerance British Journal of Political Science 38(4): 677698.
  • Pattie, C. and R. Johnston (2009). Conversation, Disagreement and Political Participation. Political Behavior 31(2): 261285.
  • Pattie, C., P. Seyd and P. Whiteley (2004). Citizenship in Britain. Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Perrin, A. (2006). Citizen Speak. The Democratic Imagination in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pfetsch, B. (2004). From Political Culture to Political Communication Culture. A Theoretical Approach to Comparative Analysis. In Esser, F. and B. Pfetsch (eds.), Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (344366).
  • Price, V. (1992). Public Opinion. Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Price, V., J. Cappella and L. Nir (2002). Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? Political Communicaiton 19(1): 95112.
  • Price, V., L. Nir and J. Cappella (2006). Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions. Communication Theory 16(1): 4774.
  • Price, V. and D. Roberts (1987). Public Opinion Processes. In Berger, C. and S. Chaffee (eds.), Handbook of Communication Science. Newbury Park: Sage (781816).
  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Pye, L. (1963). Models of Traditional, Transitional, and Modern Communications Systems. In Pye, L. (ed.), Communications and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press (2429).
  • Richardson, B. and P. Beck (2007). The Flow of Political Information: Personal Discussants, the Media, and Partisans. In Gunther, R., J. Montero and H. Puhle (eds.), Democracy, Intermediation, and Voting on Four Continents. Oxford: Oxford University Press (183207).
  • Richey, S. (2008). The Social Basis of Voting Correctly. Political Communication 25(4): 366376.
  • Richey, S. (2009). Hierarchy in Political Discussion. Political Communication 26(2): 137152.
  • Rogers, E. (1973). Mass Media and Interpersonal Communication. In De Sola Pool, I., F. Frey, W. Schramm, N. Maccoby and E. Parker (eds.), Handbook of Communication. Chicago: Rand McNally (290310).
  • Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy Versus Understanding. How Orientations toward Political Conversation Influence Political Engagement. Communication Research 35(4): 452480.
  • Rolfe, M. (2012). Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ryan, J. (2011). Social Networks as a Shortcut to Correct Voting. American Journal of Political Science 55(4): 753766.
  • Sartori, G. (1970). Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. The American Political Science Review 64(4): 10331053.
  • Scheuch, E. (1965). Die Sichtbarkeit politischer Einstellungen im alltäglichen Verhalten. In Scheuch, K. and R. Wildenmann (eds.), Zur Soziologie der Wahl (Sonderheft 9 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie). Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag(169214).
  • Scheufele, D. (2002). Examining Differential Gains Form Mass Media and Their Implications for Participatory Behavior. Communication Research 29(1): 4665.
  • Scheufele, D., B. Hardy, D. Brossard, I. Waismel-Manor and E. Nisbet (2006). Democracy Based on Difference: Examining the Links between Structural Heterogeneity, Heterogeneity of Discussion Networks, and Democratic Citizenship. Journal of Communication 56(4): 728753.
  • Scheufele, D., M. Nisbet, D. Brossard and E. Nisbet (2004). Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation. Political Communication 21(3): 315338.
  • Schmitt-Beck, R. (2000). Politische Kommunikation und Wählerverhalten. Ein internationaler Vergleich. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  • Schmitt-Beck, R. (2008). Interpersonal Communication. In Holtz-Bacha, C. and L. Kaid (eds.), Encyclopedia of Political Communication. Los Angeles: Sage (341350).
  • Schmitt-Beck, R. and C. Mackenrodt (2010). Social Networks and Mass Media as Mobilizers and Demobilizers: A Study of Turnout at a German Local Election. Electoral Studies 29(3): 392404.
  • Schmitt-Beck, R., J. Partheymüller and T. Faas (2012). Einflüsse politischer Gesprächspartner auf Parteipräferenzen: Zur ‘sozialen Logik' des politischen Verhaltens bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. Wählen in Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS) (Special Issue 45): 465488.
  • Schudson, M. (1997). Why Conversation Is Not the Soul of Democracy. Critical Studies of Mass Communication 14(4): 297309.
  • Searing, D., F. Solt, P. Conover and I. Crewe (2007). Public Discussion in the Deliberative System: Does It Make Better Citizens? British Journal of Political Science 39(4): 587618.
  • Seib, P. (2008), (ed.). Political Communication, Vols. I-IV. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Sinclair, B. (2012). The Social Citizen. Peer Networks and Political Behavior. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sokhey, A. and S. McClurg (2012). Social Networks and Correct Voting. Journal of Politics 74(3): 7511764.
  • Solt, F. (2008). Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 4860.
  • Steiner, J., A. Bächtiger, M. Spörndli and M. Steenbergen (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Straits, B. (1990). The Social Context of Voter Turnout. Public Opinion Quarterly 54(1): 6473.
  • Toka, G. (2010). The Impact of Everyday Political Talk on Involvement, Knowledge and Informed Voting. In Wolf, M., L. Morales and K. Ikeda (eds.), Political Discussion in Modern Democracies. A Comparative Perspective. London/New York: Routledge (129144).
  • Topf, R. (1995). Beyond Electoral Participation. In Klingemann, H. D. and D. Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press (5191).
  • Van Deth, J., J. Montero and A. Westholm (2007). Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Van Deth, J.W. and S. Zmerli (2010). Civicness, Equality, and Democracy: A ‘Dark Side' of Social Capital'? Special Issue of the American Behavioral Scientist 53(5).
  • Verba, S. and N. Nie (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York [u.a.]: Harper Row.
  • Verba, S., K. Schlozman and H. E. Brady (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.]: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Walsh, K. (2004). Talking About Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • White, J. (2009). Thematization and Collective Positioning in Everyday Political Talk. British Journal of Political Science 39(4): 699709.
  • Wyatt, R., E. Katz and J. Kim (2000a). Bridging the Spheres: Political and Personal Conversation in Public and Private Spaces. Journal of Communication 50(1): 7192.
  • Wyatt, R.O., E. Katz, H. Levinsohn and M. Al-Haj (1996). The Dimensions of Expression Inhibition: Perceptions of Obstacles to Free Speech in Three Cultures. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 8: 229247.
  • Wyatt, R.O., J. Kim and E. Katz (2000b). How Feeling Free to Talk Affects Ordinary Political Conversation, Purposeful Argumentation, and Civic Participation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 77(1): 99114.
  • Yunis, H. (1996). Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Zuckerman, A., J. Dasovic and J. Fitzgerald (2007). Partisan Families. The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.