SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Educational Research Association (AERA) (2000). Position statement on high-stakes testing. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Arenson, K. W. (2004). Math and science tests find 4th and 8th graders in U.S. still lag many peers. The New York Times, Dec 15, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/15/education/15math.html?_r=1
  • Armario, C. (2010). “Wake up Call”: U.S. Students Trail Global Leaders. Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40544897/ns/us_news-life/t/wake-up-call-us-students-trail-global-leaders/-.T2poF47evRc
  • Asimov, N. (n.d.). No gain by U.S. students on international exam: Math, science scores stay only above average. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/education/article/No-Gain-by-U-S-Students-On-International-Exam-3236348.php
  • Beaton, A. E., Potlethwaite, T. N., Ross, K. N., Spearritt, D., & Wolf, R. M. (1999). The benefits and limitations of international educational acheivement studies. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning/UNESCO.
  • Bracey, G. W. (1998). TIMSS: The message and the myths. Principal, 77, 1822.
  • Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) (2000). A joint position statement by the Canadian Psychological Association and the Canadian Association of School Psychologists on the Canadian press coverage of the province-wide achievement test results. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Psychological Association.
  • Cizek, G. J. (2001). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Meaurement: Issues and Practice, 4, 1927.
  • Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37, 830837.
  • Finkel, E. (2012). What can U.S. Schools learn from foreign counterparts? District Administration, 48(2), 3032.
  • Glynn, S. M. (2012). International assessment: A Rasch model and teachers' evaluation of TIMSS science achievement items. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 13211344.
  • Jakobsson, A., Mäkitalo, Å., & Säljö, R. (2009). Conceptions of knowledge in research on students' understanding of the greenhouse effect: Methodological positions and their consequences for representations of knowing. Science Education, 93(6), 978995.
  • Kohn, A. (2004). What does it mean to be well-educated? and more essays on standards, grading, and other follies. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Lomax, R. G., West, M. M., Harmon, M. C., Viator, K. A., & Madaus, G. F. (1995). The impact of mandated standardized testing on minority students. The Journal of Negro Education, 64(2), 171185.
  • MacPherson, A., & Osborne, J. (2012). There's more to science than recall: An analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis, ID. March.
  • Maltese, A. V., & Hochbein, C. D. (2012). The consequences of “school improvement”: Examining the association between two standardized assessments measuring school improvement and student science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 804830. doi:10.1002/tea.21027.
  • Miller, P. H. (2009). Theories of developmental psychology (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Graham, J. R., O'Sullivan, C. Y., & Preushoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. Amesterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
  • Nagesh, G. (2010). Obama: US Students' Performance in Science, Math is “Unacceptable,” Retrieved from http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/124789-obama-us-students-performance-in-science-and-math-is-qunacceptableq
  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (n.d.a). Dare to Compare. Retrieved March 14, 2012, from http://nces.ed.gov/nceskids/eyk/
  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (n.d.b). NCES Kid's Zone. Retrieved April 14, 2012, from http://nces.ed.gov/nceskids/
  • National Research Council (NRC) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) (2001a). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) (2001b). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Noble, T., Suarez, C., Rosebery, A., O'Connor, M. C., Warren, B., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2012). “I never thought of it as freezing”: How students answer questions on large-scale science tests and what they know about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 778803. doi:10.1002/tea.21026.
  • Olsen, R. V., & Lie, S. (2011). Profiles of students' interest in science issues around the world: Analysis of data from PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 97120.
  • Pellegrino, J. W. (2012). Assessment of science learning: Living in interesting times. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 831841. doi:10.1002/tea.21032.
  • Reddy, V. (2005). Cross-national acheivement studies: Learning from South Africa's participation in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 35(1), 6377.
  • Rotberg, I. C. (1998). Interpretation of international test score comparisons. Science, 280(5366), 10301031.
  • Shen, C. (2005). How American middle schools differ from schools of five Asian countries: Based on cross-national data from TIMSS 1999. Educational Research & Evaluation, 11(2), 179199.
  • Soh, K. C. (2012). Fifteen-years-old students of seven east Asian cities in PISA 2009: A secondary analysis. New Horizons in Education, 60(1), 8391.
  • Songer, N. B., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2012). Assessment and science education: Our essential new priority? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 683690. doi:10.1002/tea.21033.