Get access

Participation, Online and Otherwise: What's the Difference for Policy Preferences?

Authors


  • Jennifer Oser will share all data and coding for replication purposes. We would like to thank Michael Delli Carpini, Itzhak Galnoor, Hahrie Han, Marc Hooghe, David Levi-Faur, and Jeroen Vermunt for comments on earlier versions. Ken Winneg would like to thank the Annenberg Public Policy Center and its director, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, for providing the space on the 2008 NAES for the survey questions used in our research.

Abstract

Objective

One explanation for why voters’ preferences are privileged by policymakers is that voters are likely to communicate their preferences through additional avenues as well. We examine this “communication hypothesis” by comparing the policy preferences of different types of political participators.

Methods

We analyze the National Annenberg Election Survey (2008) using latent class analysis to identify different types of political participators and multinomial logistic regression to compare the policy preferences of these participator types.

Results

Voters who also engage in additional online and/or offline political acts have policy preferences that differ in a number of meaningful ways from those who “only” vote.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that prior research has overlooked important evidence on the connection between citizen participation and political outcomes due to a primary focus on the act of voting. This study suggests how future research can assess the impact of citizens’ broader patterns of political participation.

Ancillary