To assess risk factors associated with hospital admission due to acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) in indigenous Guarani children <5 years of age in southern Brazil.
To assess risk factors associated with hospital admission due to acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) in indigenous Guarani children <5 years of age in southern Brazil.
Population-based matched case–control study from May 2007 to June 2008 in 81 Guarani villages. Cases were defined as hospital admissions due to confirmed ALRTI. Two controls free from acute respiratory infection, matched according to age, sex and place of residence, were selected for each case at the time of the case's hospitalisation. Both cases and controls were recruited by a surveillance routine established for the study.
The analysis was performed on 120 cases and 201 controls. The risk factors that remained significantly associated with hospitalisation due to ALRTI in the hierarchical multivariate conditional logistic regression were: low stable monthly per capita household income (<US$30.00 = OR: 2.77, IC95%: 1.51–5.10; no income= OR: 1.88, IC95%: 1.02–3.47); large number of persons in the household (6–9 = OR: 2.03, IC95%: 1.06–3.88; 10–16 = OR: 5.00, IC95%: 1.81–13.86); indoor exposure to fumes from burning firewood used for cooking (OR: 3.08, IC95%: 1.39–6.84);low maternal age (OR: 2.77, IC95%: 1.42–5.39); and low birthweight (OR: 6.12, IC95%: 1.44–26.13).
Acute respiratory infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among Guarani children. Our study provides the first evidence about their determinants in indigenous peoples in Brazil that can help to better understand the epidemiology of respiratory infections in indigenous children.
Evaluer les facteurs de risque associés à l'hospitalisation due à une infection aiguë des voies respiratoires inférieures (IAVRI) chez les enfants indigènes guaranis âgés de <5 ans dans le sud du Brésil.
Etude cas-témoins appariés, basée sur la population de mai 2007 à juin 2008 dans 81 villages guaranis. Les cas ont été définis comme les hospitalisations dues à des IAVRI confirmées. Pour chaque cas, deux témoins indemnes d'infection respiratoire aiguë, appariés selon l’âge, le sexe et le lieu de résidence, ont été sélectionnés au moment de l'hospitalisation du cas. Les cas et les témoins ont été recrutés au cours d'une surveillance de routine mise en place pour l’étude.
L'analyse a été effectuée sur 120 cas et 201 témoins. Les facteurs de risque qui restaient significativement associés à des risques plus élevés d'hospitalisation pour IAVRI dans la hiérarchie de la régression logistique multivariée conditionnelle étaient les suivants: revenus stables bas du ménage par habitant (<30,00 US$ = OR: 2,77, IC95%: 1,51 à 5,10; Aucun revenu = OR: 1,88, IC95%: 1,02 à 3,47), grand nombre de personnes dans le ménage (6 à 9 = OR: 2,03, IC95%: 1,06 à 3,88; 10 à 16 = OR: 5,00, IC95%: 1,81 à 13,86), l'exposition à la fumée d'intérieur du bois brûlant utilisé pour la cuisson (OR: 3,08, IC95%: 1,39 à 6,84), âge maternel bas (OR: 2,77, IC95%: 1,42 à 5.39) et faible poids de naissance (OR: 6,12, IC95%: 1,44 à 26,13).
Les infections respiratoires aiguës sont une cause majeure de morbidité et de mortalité chez les enfants guarani. Notre étude fournit la première évidence sur leurs déterminants dans une population indigène au Brésil, ce qui peut aider à mieux comprendre l’épidémiologie des infections respiratoires chez les enfants autochtones.
Evaluar los factores de riesgo asociados a los ingresos hospitalarios por infecciones agudas del tracto respiratorio inferior (IATRI) en niños indígenas Guaraníes <5 años de edad en el sur del Brasil.
Estudio poblacional de casos y controles pareados entre Mayo 2007 y Junio 2008 en 81 poblados Guaraníes. Los casos se definieron como ingresos hospitalarios debido a IATRIs confirmadas. Se seleccionaron dos controles libres de infección respiratoria aguda, pareados según edad, sexo y lugar de residencia para cada uno de los casos, en el momento de la hospitalización. Tanto los casos como los controles fueron reclutados mediante la vigilancia rutinaria establecida para el estudio.
El análisis se realizó sobre 120 casos y 201 controles. Los factores de riesgo que estaban asociados de forma significativa con una mayor probabilidad de hospitalización por IATRI en un análisis de regresión múltiple jerárquica eran: un ingreso per capita bajo y estable en el hogar (<US$30.00 = OR: 2.77, IC 95%: 1.51–5.10; ningún ingreso= OR: 1.88, IC 95%: 1.02–3.47); un gran número de personas en el hogar (6–9 = OR: 2.03, IC 95%: 1.06–3.88; 10–16 = OR: 5.00, IC 95%: 1.81–13.86), exposición intradomiciliaria a humos por quemar leña para cocinar (OR: 3.08, IC 95%: 1.39–6.84), la juventud de la madre (OR: 2.77, IC 95%: 1.42–5.39), y el bajo peso al nacer (OR: 6.12, IC 95%: 1.44–26.13).
Las infecciones respiratorias agudas son una causa importante de morbilidad y de mortalidad entre niños Guaraníes. Nuestro estudio aporta la primera evidencia de cuales son sus determinantes entre poblaciones indígenas del Brasil, que puede ayudarnos a entender mejor la epidemiología de las infecciones respiratorias en niños indígenas.
Acute respiratory infection (ARI) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, disproportionally affecting younger children (Fuchs et al. 2005; Rudan et al. 2008). Recent assessments of epidemiological trends in Brazil point to major achievements in reduction in morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases (Barreto et al. 2003). The overall epidemiological picture documented for indigenous peoples in Brazil, however, suggests a very different pattern. ARI ranks high as cause of disease and death among indigenous groups, especially among children. Pneumonia constitutes the leading cause of hospitalisation in indigenous children in Brazil, often accounting for over 50% of all cases recorded (Coimbra et al. 2013; Lunardi et al. 2007; Orellana et al. 2007). Research conducted among Guarani Indians reported an even higher proportion of hospitalisations due to ARI, reaching 71.9% in children under 5 years of age and 78.4% in infants (Cardoso et al. 2010). Moreover, ARI accounts for more than two-thirds of all deaths of Guarani children under 5 years of age (Cardoso et al. 2011).
The identification of risk factors associated with ARI in different populations is paramount for the formulation of more effective policies and strategies to improve health globally (WHO 2009). Despite scientific advances in ARI epidemiology in Brazil (Victora et al. 1989, 1994; Fonseca et al. 1996a,b; César et al. 1997, 1999; Albernaz et al. 2003; Macedo et al. 2007; Prietsch et al. 2008), there is no available information about risk factors for ARI among indigenous peoples. This study reports the results of a population-based matched case–control study carried out among the Guarani Indians of southern Brazil to assess risk factors for hospital admission due to acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) in children under 5 years of age.
The Guarani constitute one of the most numerous indigenous groups in Brazil. The Guarani subgroups investigated in this study included the Mbyá and the Nhandeva, who inhabit a discontinuous territory with numerous villages in southern Brazil (Ladeira 2007). Families tend to be large and usually live in houses with dirt floors, wood or wattle-and-adobe walls, and palm thatch roofs. Guarani villages often lack sanitation and suffer from unpredictable resource availability due to environmental degradation and peripheral participation in the regional economy.
A matched case–control study was performed between 1 May 2007 and 30 June 2008 to investigate risk factors associated with hospitalisation due to ALRTI in Guarani children <5 years old residing in 83 villages in southern Brazil, in the following states: Rio Grande do Sul (32 villages), Santa Catarina (16), Paraná (4), São Paulo (26) and Rio de Janeiro (5). During the study period, two villages in the state of São Paulo were excluded from the study due to operational difficulties in collecting data. The total Guarani population in the remaining 81 villages included in this study was approximately 6000 individuals (20% under 5 years of age).
Cases were defined as Guarani children <5 years old residing in a participating village hospitalised for ALRTI within the study period. Controls were defined as Guarani children <5 years old free from acute respiratory signs and symptoms or other acute infections requiring the use of antibiotics 15 days before and 7 days after the date of hospital admission of the matched case.
Hospitalisation due to ALRTI was defined as in-hospital care ≥24 h, when the child presented chest indrawing and/or tachypnea in the presence of cough or difficult breathing, complemented by information on other clinical signs (crepitation, wheezing, stridor) and/or radiological evidence of lung disease (infiltrate), whenever available in the hospital records (PAHO 2001). Two controls with matching age, sex and place of residence were selected for each case. Controls were not previously hospitalised for ALRTI or resided in the same house as the matched case. Children selected as controls could subsequently become a case if they were hospitalised for ALRTI.
A surveillance routine was established to report hospitalisations possibly due to ARI in children and to recruit controls. Immediately after the identification of a case, the fieldworker responsible for monitoring a given village selected two controls based on a list of eligible children. All hospital records were reviewed by a paediatrician. Hospitalisations that could not be confirmed as ALRTI were excluded from the study.
A culturally adapted questionnaire focusing on known risk factors for ALRTI was administered to parents of cases and matched controls within 15 days of hospitalisation of the case. Data extracted from secondary medical records in the village included children's medical history, use of health services, birthweight, height and weight. The study variables and their corresponding categories of analysis are described in Figure 1 and Tables 1-3. Variables requiring further clarification are detailed below.
|Characteristics||Cases||Controls||Crude OR (95% CI)||P-value|
|n (%)||n (%)|
|Yes||32 (26.9)||81 (40.5)||1.00|
|No||87 (73.1)||119 (59.5)||1.97 (1.17–3.32)||0.01a|
|Yes||12 (10.1)||23 (11.4)||1.00|
|No||107 (89.9)||178 (88.6)||1.13 (0.53–2.37)||0.75|
|Supplementary income from government|
|No||69 (58.0)||129 (64.2)||1.00|
|Yes||50 (42.0)||72 (35.8)||1.39 (0.80–2.42)||0.24|
|Earning from handcrafts sale|
|Yes||61 (51.3)||103 (51.2)||1.00|
|No||58 (48.7)||98 (48.8)||0.98 (0.58–1.64)||0.93|
|Yes||58 (48.3)||87 (43.3)||1.00|
|No||62 (51.7)||114 (56.7)||0.65 (0.35–1.20)||0.17a|
|Basic food baskets|
|No||62 (51.7)||110 (54.7)||1.00|
|Yes||58 (48.3)||91 (45.3)||1.18 (0.68–2.06)||0.54|
|Stable household income per capita (US$)||Linear trend||P = 0.035|
|≥30.00||28 (24.3)||80 (40.8)||1.00|
|<30.00||51 (44.4)||61 (31.1)||2.77 (1.51–5.10)||0.001a|
|No income||36 (31.3)||55 (28.1)||1.88 (1.02–3.47)||0.043a|
|Total household income per capita (US$)||Linear trend||P = 0.024|
|≥ 30.00||38 (33.3)||87 (45.8)||1.00|
|< 30.00||56 (49.1)||82 (43.2)||1.60 (0.95–2.70)||0.078a|
|No income||20 (17.6)||21 (11.0)||2.13 (0.98–4.61)||0.056a|
|Number of household goods||Linear trend||P = 0.683|
|≥5||28 (23.7)||62 (31.5)||1.00|
|3–4||35 (29.7)||47 (23.9)||1.65 (0.80–3.40)||0.174a|
|1–2||33 (28.0)||44 (22.3)||1.82 (0.84–3.93)||0.128a|
|None||22 (18.6)||44 (22.3)||1.21 (0.53–2.77)||0.645|
|Paternal schooling (higher level in years)||Linear trend||P = 0.159|
|≥7||19 (26.4)||41 (31.3)||1.00|
|1–6||44 (61.1)||48 (36.6)||2.18 (0.83–5.76)||0.11a|
|No schooling||9 (12.5)||42 (32.1)||0.32 (0.08–1.30)||0.11a|
|Paternal age (years)||Linear trend||P = 0.441|
|≥40||12 (11.8)||15 (8.2)||1.00|
|30–39||18 (17.6)||47 (25.5)||0.54 (0.20–1.47)||0.23|
|20–29||50 (49.0)||97 (52.7)||0.67 (0.27–1.63)||0.37|
|<20||22 (21.6)||25 (13.6)||1.14 (0.42–3.11)||0.80|
|Characteristics||Cases||Controls||OR (95% CI) P-value|
|n (%)||n (%)||Crude||Adjusteda|
|Type of walls|
|Brick||17 (14.3)||32 (16.2)||1.00||1.00|
|Wooden plank||64 (53.8)||100 (50.8)||1.45 (0.69–3.05)||0.33||0.77 (0.33–1.78)||0.54|
|Baulk||15 (12.6)||23 (11.7)||1.50 (0.54–4.14)||0.44||0.78 (0.26–2.33)||0.66|
|Wattle and daub||15 (12.6)||27 (13.7)||1.27 (0.48–3.37)||0.63||0.89 (0.32–2.48)||0.82|
|Mixture||8 (6.7)||15 (7.6)||1.21 (0.40–3.66)||0.74||0.79 (0.25–2.56)||0.70|
|Clay tile||32 (26.7)||56 (27.9)||1.00||1.00|
|Zinc/asbestos tile||61 (50.8)||112 (55.7)||0.91 (0.43–1.90)||0.80||0.74 (0.34–1.65)||0.47|
|Thatch/clapboard||19 (15.8)||21 (10.4)||2.02 (0.80–5.10)||0.14||1.68 (0.63–4.51)||0.31|
|Mixture||8 (6.7)||12 (6.0)||1.46 (0.49–4.73)||0.53||1.69 (0.47–6.05)||0.42|
|Ceramics||8 (6.7)||11 (5.6)||1.00||1.00|
|Cement||19 (16.0)||36 (18.3)||0.73 (0.24–2.16)||0.57||0.59 (0.17–1.20)||0.40|
|Wood||19 (16.0)||33 (16.7)||0.81 (0.24–2.78)||0.74||0.48 (0.12–1.92)||0.30|
|Dirt||73 (61.3)||117 (59.4)||0.90 (0.33–2.45)||0.84||0.52 (0.16–1.67)||0.28|
|Faucet at home|
|Yes||24 (21.4)||52 (27.2)||1.00||1.00|
|No||88 (78.6)||139 (72.8)||1.59 (0.82–3.09)||0.17||1.18 (0.58–2.41)||0.64|
|Yes, indoor||28 (23.3)||59 (29.6)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes, outdoor||70 (58.3)||116 (58.3)||1.38 (0.75–2.53)||0.30||1.03 (0.54–1.97)||0.93|
|No||22 (18.4)||24 (12.1)||2.92 (1.18–7.22)||0.02||2.28 (0.85–6.11)||0.10b|
|Number of doors||Linear trend||P = 0.160|
|≥3||14 (11.8)||30 (15.0)||1.00||1.00|
|2||46 (38.7)||59 (29.5)||1.58 (0.73–3.45)||0.24||1.52 (0.67–3.49)||0.32|
|1||59 (49.5)||111 (55.5)||1.08 (0.51–2.29)||0.83||0.78 (0.35–1.74)||0.54|
|Number of windows||Linear trend||P = 0.964|
|≥4||26 (22.0)||45 (22.5)||1.00||1.00|
|2–3||35 (29.7)||62 (29.7)||0.96 (0.48–1.92)||0.92||1.13 (0.54–2.38)||0.74|
|1||11 (9.3)||31 (15.5)||0.62 (0.24–1.58)||0.32||0.63 (0.23–1.75)||0.38|
|None||46 (39.0)||62 (31.0)||1.30 (0.64–2.64)||0.48||1.10 (0.51–2.40)||0.80|
|Physical characteristics of the house Index||Linear trend||P = 0.096|
|Level 3||20 (22.5)||47 (33.6)||1.00||1.00|
|Level 2||15 (16.8)||32 (22.9)||1.24 (0.50–3.06)||0.64||0.87 (0.31–2.45)||0.79|
|Level 1||54 (60.7)||61 (43.6)||2.22 (1.09–4.53)||0.03||1.74 (0.78–3.89)||0.18b|
|Place where child sleeps|
|Bed/stage/lace||80 (69.6)||161 (82.6)||1.00||1.00|
|Floor||35 (30.4)||34 (17.4)||2.74 (1.41–5.30)||0.003||2.80 (1.38–5.71)||0.005b|
|Number of persons in household||Linear trend||P = 0.006|
|2–5||55 (45.8)||123 (61.2)||1.00||1.00|
|6–9||43 (35.8)||66 (32.8)||1.51 (0.92–2.48)||0.10||1.40 (0.82–2.40)||0.214|
|10–16||22 (18.3)||12 (6.0)||4.40 (1.92–10.08)||0.000||3.47 (1.47–8.16)||0.004b|
|Number of other children <5 in household||Linear trend||P = 0.023|
|≤ 1||32 (28.3)||86 (45.3)||1.00||1.00|
|2||58 (51.3)||81 (42.6)||2.14 (1.22–3.79)||0.008||2.10 (1.15–3.83)||0.016b|
|3–6||23 (20.4)||23 (12.1)||2.88 (1.34–6.21)||0.007||2.25 (1.01–4.99)||0.047b|
|Number of other persons sleeping in the same room||Linear trend||P = 0.03|
|≤2||31 (26.7)||77 (38.9)||1.00||1.00|
|3–6||62 (53.4)||107 (54.0)||1.33 (0.76–2.31)||0.315||1.19 (0.67–2.10)||0.554|
|7–15||23 (19.8)||14 (7.1)||6.85 (2.42–19.2)||0.000||4.18 (1.40–12.52)||0.011b|
|Number of other children < 5 sleeping in the same room||Linear trend||P = 0.183|
|None||42 (37.8)||97 (51.3)||1.00||1.00|
|1||53 (47.8)||75 (39.7)||1.71 (0.99–2.92)||0.05||1.47 (0.84–2.58)||0.177b|
|2–5||16 (14.4)||17 (9.0)||2.38 (1.03–5.48)||0.042||1.62 (0.66–4.00)||0.290|
|Number of other persons sleeping in the same bed||Linear trend||P = 0.221|
|≤ 1||17 (15.9)||53 (28.5)||1.00||1.00|
|2||51 (47.7)||65 (34.9)||2.75 (1.35–5.59)||0.005||3.16 (1.48–6.73)||0.003b|
|2–10||39 (36.4)||68 (36.6)||1.96 (0.92–4.14)||0.08||1.89 (0.85–4.21)||0.118b|
|Number of other children <5 sleeping in the same bed|
|None||60 (57.1)||128 (70.3)||1.00||1.00|
|1–4||45 (42.9)||54 (29.7)||1.84 (1.07–3.16)||0.03||1.62 (0.92–2.88)||0.097b|
|Location of the main fire|
|Kitchen indoor/outdoor||80 (74.1)||166 (87.4)||1.00||1.00|
|Indoor, household without partitions||28 (25.9)||24 (12.6)||2.25 (1.15–4.41)||0.02||2.17 (1.09–4.33)||0.028b|
|Cooking inside the house with gas stove|
|Always||33 (29.0)||69 (35.4)||1.00||1.00|
|Sometimes, never||81 (71.0)||126 (64.6)||1.26 (0.72–2.23)||0.42||1.20 (0.65–2.19)||0.56|
|Cooking inside the house with wood stove|
|Sometimes/never||87 (75.0)||156 (80.0)||1.00||1.00|
|Always||29 (25.0)||39 (20.0)||1.47 (0.81–2.67)||0.20||1.28 (0.68–2.39)||0.44|
|No||62 (52.5)||105 (52.8)||1.00||1.00|
|Open fire/wood stove||56 (47.5)||94 (47.2)||1.01 (0.57–1.80)||0.96||0.79 (0.42–1.50)||0.48|
|Alternative source of light (lamp/candle)|
|No||35 (30.2)||72 (37.5)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||81 (69.8)||120 (62.5)||1.73 (0.92–3.28)||0.09||2.05 (1.02–4.11)||0.042b|
|Smokers at home (cigarette)|
|No||69 (57.5)||121 (60.2)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||51 (42.5)||80 (39.8)||1.17 (0.72–1.92)||0.53||1.11 (0.66–1.86)||0.70|
|No||104 (87.4)||175 (87.9)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||15 (12.6)||24 (12.1)||1.14 (0.56–2.35)||0.71||1.05 (0.50–2.22)||0.89|
|Maternal age (years)|
|26–45||32 (27.3)||89 (44.9)||1.00||1.00|
|12–25||85 (72.7)||109 (55.1)||2.25 (1.34–3.78)||0.002||2.19 (1.27–3.78)||0.005b|
|Maternal schooling (higher level in years)||Linear trend||P = 0.672|
|≥ 7||14 (12.7)||37 (19.1)||1.00||1.00|
|1–6||53 (48.2)||71 (36.6)||1.79 (0.82–3.89)||0.14||1.32 (0.58–2.99)||0.506|
|None||43 (39.1)||86 (44.3)||1.32 (0.60–2.92)||0.49||0.97 (0.41–2.26)||0.94|
|Maternal smoking during pregnancy|
|No||83 (78.3)||131 (73.2)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||23 (21.7)||48 (26.8)||0.82 (0.44–1.53)||0.53||0.68 (0.34–1.36)||0.278|
|Maternal alcohol use during pregnancy|
|No||101 (91.8)||171 (92.4)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||9 (8.2)||14 (7.6)||1.14 (0.47–2.77)||0.76||0.96 (0.37–2.47)||0.93|
|Characteristics||Cases||Controls||OR (95% CI) P-value|
|n (%)||n (%)||Crude||Adjusteda|
|≥2500||70 (80.5)||132 (91.7)||1.00||1.00|
|<2500||17 (19.5)||12 (8.33)||4.22 (1.52–11.75)||0.006||6.12 (1.44–26.13)||0.014b|
|Place of delivery|
|Outside the village||76 (64.4)||124 (63.9)||1.00||1.00|
|Village||42 (35.6)||70 (36.1)||1.03 (0.63–1.70)||0.9||0.87 (0.46–1.66)||0.67|
|Type of delivery|
|Vaginal||108 (92.3)||169 (85.8)||1.00||1.00|
|Caesarean||9 (7.7)||28 (14.2)||0.52 (0.24–1.15)||0.11||0.58 (0.22–1.51)||0.27|
|Child was fed with colostrum|
|Yes||114 (96.6)||191 (98.4)||1.00||1.00|
|No||4 (3.4)||3 (1.5)||2.21 (0.48–10.03)||0.3||1.67 (0.22–12.89)||0.622|
|Exclusive breastfeeding (in months)|
|≤3||42 (41.6)||65 (37.1)||1.10 (0.54–2.20)||0.80||0.78 (0.31–2.00)||0.61|
|4–7||50 (49.5)||83 (47.4)||1.00||1.00|
|≥8||9 (8.9)||27 (15.4)||0.62 (0.24–1.56)||0.31||0.50 (0.15–1.68)||0.26|
|No||61 (52.1)||124 (62.3)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||56 (47.9)||75 (37.7)||1.76 (1.03–3.01)||0.04||1.89 (0.98–3.62)||0.055b|
|Family members with asthma|
|No||103 (87.3)||187 (94.0)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||15 (12.7)||12 (6.0)||2.37 (1.01–5.56)||0.05||2.39 (0.74–7.79)||0.147b|
|Ongoing maternal pregnancy|
|No||104 (92.0)||187 (95.4)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||9 (8.0)||9 (4.6)||1.78 (0.68–4.70)||0.24||2.32 (0.71–7.59)||0.163b|
|Marital status of the mother|
|With partner||85 (74.6)||163 (82.3)||1.00||1.00|
|Alone||29 (25.4)||35 (17.7)||1.56 (0.89–2.74)||0.12||0.93 (0.47–1.88)||0.849|
|≥−1||28 (36.4)||95 (70.9)||1.00||1.00|
|<−1||49 (63.6)||39 (29.1)||4.14 (2.09–8.22)||0.000||5.65 (1.43–22.37)||0.014b|
|≥−1||50 (84.8)||96 (92.3)||1.00||1.00|
|<−1||9 (15.2)||8 (7.7)||1.5 (0.48–4.73)||0.49||0.41 (0.05–3.59)||0.42|
|≥−1||8 (11.8)||28 (26.4)||1.00||1.00|
|<−1||60 (88.2)||78 (73.6)||2.98 (0.95–9.34)||0.06||12.83 (0.97–170.28)||0.053b|
|No||47 (40.2)||178 (89.0)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||70 (59.8)||22 (11.0)||15.9 (6.86–36.88)||0.000||17.27 (3.98–75.02)||0.000b|
|Previous wheezing in the lifetime|
|No||31 (25.8)||136 (68.0)||1.00||1.00|
|Yes||89 (74.2)||64 (32.0)||9.54 (4.72–19.28)||0.000||40.51 (6.32–259.41)||0.001b|
For the purposes of this study, income was defined as monetary earnings (e.g. salaries, pensions, government donations and craft sales) obtained during the month prior to hospitalisation of the case. Income was transformed into two indicators: (a) stable household income per capita (total household salaries and pensions divided by the number of household residents) and (b) total household income per capita (total household stable and unstable monetary earnings divided by the number of household residents). The number of household goods (refrigerator, gas stove, television, fan, DVD or VCR player, radio, mobile phone) was used as an indicator of the household's capacity to purchase.
The index physical characteristic of the house considered six items. For each item, a score of 0 or 1 was assigned as follows: flooring (dirt/wood = 0; others = 1), roofing (thatch/clapboard = 0; others = 1), type of walls (wood/wattle-and-daub = 0; others = 1), number of windows (none = 0; ≥ 1 = 1), bathroom with latrine and piped water (no=0, yes=1) and cooking fire (indoors without partitions = 0; outside or indoors in a partitioned kitchen = 1). This index was calculated as the ranked sum of all variables as follows: level 1 (score 0 to 2), level 2 (score 3 to 4) and level 3 (score 5 to 6), corresponding to putative decreasing risk of ALRTI (high, intermediate and low, respectively).
The nutritional assessment indexes weight-for-age (W/A), weight-for-height (W/H) and height-for-age (H/A) were calculated, and children were classified as well nourished (z-scores for W/A, W/H and H/A ≥ −1.00) or undernourished (any of the z-scores <−1.00) (WHO 2006).
Associations between variables were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding confidence intervals (95% CI), estimated using conditional logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software 9.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).
The modelling strategy was based on a conceptual hierarchical model for the determination of ALRTI specifically proposed for Guarani children <5 years of age (Figure 1), following Victora et al. (1997). Variables situated in level 1 with a significance level of P < 0.20 in the univariate analysis were jointly included in a multivariate regression model for this level. A backward procedure was then used to progressively exclude variables, retaining only those with a significance level of P < 0.05.
An adjusted OR for each variable in level 2 was determined by conditional logistic regression including the variables retained in the previous hierarchical level. Those variables exhibiting an OR with P < 0.20 for this level were jointly included in a conditional multivariate logistic regression model with the variables retained from level 1. As before, a backward procedure was used to retain those variables of level 2 showing statistically significant association with ALRTI (P < 0.05).
Analysis of subsequent hierarchical levels followed the same procedures as described for level 2. In the final model, the adjusted OR values for each variable were those mutually adjusted for the variables in the same hierarchical level and also for the variables retained from the previous hierarchical levels. The jackknife sampling–resampling procedure was used as a way to avoid potential unduly influence of certain observations on the results of the multivariate analyses (Abdi & Williams 2010).
The study was authorised by the Ethics Committee of the National School of Public Health (ENSP), the Brazilian National Committee for Research Ethics, the National Indian Foundation, the local Indigenous Health District Council, the community leaders of participating villages and the parents of each case and control child.
We recorded 293 hospitalisations of children <5 years old with suspected ALRTI as the primary cause in the 81 villages participating in the study. Of these, 105 (35.8%) cases could not be contacted for subsequent interviews and 68 (23.2%) did not meet eligibility criteria during the revision of hospital records or could not be matched to controls. Thus, matched analysis was performed on 120 cases and 201 controls (81 trios and 39 pairs). This sample conferred a 90% power to detect an OR ≥2.5 with a 5% level of significance, if the prevalence of exposure varied between 14 and 71%. In 82.5% of cases and 73.1% of controls, interviews were performed within 7 days of the date of hospitalisation of the case.
No statistically significant differences were observed for either sex or age between the cases included in the analysis and those that were lost or excluded. However, an excess of hospitalisations due to pneumonia and to multiple hospitalisations for ALRTI in the same child was identified among the lost and excluded cases.
The distribution of cases and controls according to different categories of the variables investigated in this study, along with their corresponding OR, 95% CI and P-values are described in Tables 1-3. A protective crude effect against hospitalisation due to ALRTI was observed in children who lived in households with at least one salaried member (Table 1). Children living in households with stable or total income per capita <US$30.00 were hospitalised at least 1.6 times more frequently than their better off counterparts. Supplementary earnings, including government's social benefits, as well as local food production, did not prevent hospitalisations due to ALRTI.
Children living in households without bathrooms, in households classified at level 1 of the physical characteristics index or in households where children slept on the floor showed higher odds (P < 0.20) for hospitalisation due to ALRTI, after adjustment for stable household per capita income (Table 2). All indicators of overcrowding were directly associated with hospitalisation for ALRTI, as were indoor cooking fires in houses without partitions and use of smoke-producing light. The OR of hospitalisation was higher when the mother was younger. Maternal smoking, alcohol drinking during pregnancy or child's cohabitation with adult smokers did not show significant association with hospitalisation for ALRTI.
Children with low birthweight were more than six times as likely to be hospitalised due to ALRTI as children with adequate birthweight after adjusting for variables retained from previous hierarchical levels (Table 3). To a lesser degree, the same pattern was observed for baby bottle-feeding, family history of asthma and maternal pregnancy. No significant association was found with other perinatal factors, duration of exclusive breastfeeding or marital status of the mother. Among the variables considered in the proximal level of determination, undernourished children and children with previous hospitalisation and wheezing showed significantly higher odds for hospitalisation after adjusting for variables retained from previous hierarchical levels (Table 3).
Table 4 describes the final model of hierarchical multivariate conditional logistic regression of risk factors for hospitalisation. The lack of stable per capita household income was the only indicator in level 1 that remained significantly associated with higher odds of hospitalisation. Moreover, hospitalisation was significantly associated with number of persons in the household, cooking with firewood, young maternal age and low birthweight. Low W/A and previous hospitalisations, which were significantly associated with hospitalisation for ALRTI, lost statistical significance and were excluded from the final model, after jackknife procedure (low W/A: OR: 6.23, IC95%: 0.02–2111.75, P = 0.53; previous hospitalisations: OR: 12.27, IC95%: 0.00–31748.77, P = 0.52).
|Level||Characteristics||ORa (95% CI)||P-value|
|1 Socio-economic||Linear trend||P = 0.035|
|Stable household income per capita (US$)||≥30.00||1.00|
|No income||1.88 (1.01–3.50)||0.047|
|2 Environmental||Linear trend||P = 0.001|
|Number of persons in household||2–5||1.00|
|Location of the main fire||Kitchen indoor/outdoor||1.00|
|Indoor, household without partitions||3.08 (1.28–7.45)||0. 013|
|Maternal age (years)||26–45||1.00|
|Birthweight (grams)||≥ 2500||1.00|
|< 2500||6.12 (1.18–31.73)||0.031|
Approximately 156 million cases of pneumonia are estimated to occur in children <5 years of age worldwide each year, with roughly 96% occurring in developing countries. Of this total, 7–13% of cases require hospitalisation, and the death toll is high (Rudan et al. 2008).
The role of socio-economic factors as determinants of ALRTI morbidity and mortality is well established (Victora et al. 1994; Graham 2001). Notwithstanding, the only socio-economic indicator shown in this study to have a significant and independent protective effect against hospitalisation due to ALRTI among Guarani children was stable household income per capita. Other socio-economic indicators used in this study were probably not specific enough due to important aspects of Guarani social organisation (e.g. reciprocity) that might blur eventual interhousehold economic differences (Ladeira 2007).
It has been reported that children living in houses constructed from non-industrialised materials are at higher risk of contracting ALRTI, probably because earth floors favour accumulation of domestic residues and dust (López-Bravo et al. 1997, Prietsch et al. 2008; Savitha et al. 2007). The combination of materials used in house construction and architectural style contributes to indoor air quality. One study addressing housing pattern and health among indigenous peoples in Ecuador showed that, in contrast with traditional housing that ensured more constant temperatures and provided better overall protection, many new houses were built with lower ceilings, had less air circulation and were built with a mix of materials of questionable quality (Kroeger 1980). Present-day Guarani houses differ greatly from those constructed with traditional indigenous architectural techniques, more closely resembling those commonly observed in poor rural areas throughout Brazil. The relatively homogeneous pattern of contemporary Guarani housing could explain the absence of an association between house type and hospitalisation due to ALRTI.
Another relevant feature of Guarani houses is that they are usually inhabited by large numbers of individuals. In this study, overcrowding was associated with higher rates of hospitalisation for ALRTI among Guarani children. This association might imply a rising probability of interpersonal transmission of respiratory pathogens with a rising number of household occupants, as has been shown elsewhere (Victora et al. 1994; Simoes 2003).
The Guarani usually use firewood for indoor cooking and heating. Guarani children living in households with no partition and indoor fire were at significantly higher risk of hospitalisation for ALRTI. The relationship between suspended particulate matter from biomass burning indoors and risk of ALRTI, particularly severe pneumonia, has been described for various communities and is likely to negatively affect the general defence mechanisms of the lungs, including its mucociliary function, which leads to increased susceptibility to respiratory diseases (Banerji et al. 2009, Dherani et al. 2008; Simoes 2003). Children are particularly susceptible to domestic air pollution.
Previous hospitalisation and history of wheezing were associated with risk of hospitalisation for ALRTI among Guarani children, although both did not remain in the final model. Wheezing in particular often correlates with ALRTI in young children. In the case of Guarani children, this association is probably related to domestic environmental conditions that chronically expose children to airborne pathogens and pollutants from early age (Victora et al. 1994; Kusel et al. 2007; Castro-Rodrigues et al. 2008). Indoor smoke produced by firewood and overcrowding are likely the most significant environmental and demographic factors that might explain risk of hospitalisation due to ALRTI in Guarani children. More research is needed to assess the role played by the overall structural and environmental characteristics of Guarani houses and their effects on child respiratory health.
The protective effect of older maternal age on children's respiratory health has been noted previously in Brazil (Victora et al. 1994; César et al. 1997; Prietsch et al. 2008) and was further substantiated in this study. Although most authors explain this association based on common sense arguments (i.e. the older the mother, the more experienced she should be in caring for her child), little is known from a sociocultural perspective about mothering and childcare in Guarani society.
Different from what has been observed in non-indigenous Brazilian populations (César et al. 1997; Prietsch et al. 2008), we did not find maternal schooling to have a protective effect. Maternal schooling correlates inversely with maternal age in Guarani women. It is possible that the effect of schooling in Guarani mothers on the odds of hospitalisation due to ALRTI will become relevant as more women have access to elementary school. Birthweight was found to be inversely associated with hospitalisations for ALRTI, thus agreeing with several other studies of risk factors for ARI (Victora et al. 1994; Fonseca et al. 1996a,b; Simoes 2003). This is because young children born with low birthweight are at higher risk of contracting and dying from pneumonia, as this condition is commonly associated with shortened breastfeeding, undernutrition and impaired biological immunity.
The association between undernutrition (low W/A) and hospitalisation for ALRTI reported by several studies carried out in Brazil emphasise the mutual effect of undernutrition and increased susceptibility to infectious diseases, as the child's cell-mediated immune response may be compromised due to thyme lymphocyte depression (Victora et al. 1994; López-Bravo et al. 1997, Fonseca et al. 1996a,b). Such association was not observed in Guarani children. This may have resulted from the hierarchical approach undertaken, in which the effects of more proximal variables were adjusted for a large number of potentially explanatory variables from more distal levels.
Although the protective effect of breastfeeding against hospitalisation due to ALRTI is widely accepted (Bachrach et al. 2003; Victora et al. 1994; López-Bravo et al. 1997, Dharmage et al. 1996), this association was not found for Guarani children. More research on this topic in needed as little is known about breastfeeding and other baby feeding practices among the Guarani.
Some methodological features of the present study deserve additional comments. The potential cases of ALRTI that could not be included in the analyses due to lack of interviews or matched controls showed higher frequencies of pneumonia and severe pneumonia and were younger than the cases included in the study. As younger children with these outcomes probably have higher levels of exposure to risk factors, this may have resulted in underestimations of the association. The inclusion criteria adopted in this study were sufficiently specific for the diagnosis of ALRTI. Nevertheless, due to the different levels of hospital complexity to which Guarani children are referred, and because the quality of records in these institutions varies greatly, some Guarani children suffering from recurrent bronchial hyperactivity and asthma may have been included among our cases. Previous hospitalisation by ALRTI, considered an ineligibility criterion for controls, could have resulted in overestimated OR. Otherwise, our criteria did not exclude controls who were hospitalised for any other reason or who suffered from ARI as outpatients, which possibly attenuated such potential bias.
Some methodological advances of the study design warrant highlighting. The study clearly defined a population from which to recruit cases and controls, thus minimising selection bias; established a specific village-based surveillance system, which allowed for the identification of the local reference hospital network and improved recruitment; collected data for more than 1 year, thus covering all seasons; and conducted the interviews within a short period of time to minimise recall bias.
References to the Guarani people first appeared in the 16th century narratives of early European travellers to coastal Brazil and neighbouring countries in southern South America. Since then, their various groups suffered from direct persecution, enslavement and infectious disease epidemics, leading to depopulation and significant changes in their economic system and social organisation (Souza 2002; Lugon 2010). Today, they live in villages within small federal reserves, in camps of various sizes along highways, and on the periphery of major cities, where they suffer from precarious to hazardous living conditions. Despite the fact that the southern Brazilian states are considered the most developed in the country, indigenous children living in this region face disproportionate risk of early death and high prevalence rates of undernutrition and infectious and parasitic disease (Scolari et al. 2000; Pícoli et al. 2006; Cardoso et al. 2010, 2011; Brandelli et al. 2012). Recent epidemiological analyses of hospital morbidity and mortality among the Guarani Indians in Brazil confirm their vulnerability to acute respiratory infections, with smaller children carrying the heaviest disease burden.
The hierarchical conceptual model that oriented the present analysis allowed for the identification of absence of stable per capita household income, number of persons in the household, indoor exposure to firewood smoke, young maternal age and low birthweight as risk factors for ALRTI in Guarani children. These findings are of great relevance for critically analysing the preventive strategies and treatment protocols currently used by the local health services attending Guarani children. Although the primary focus of the study was not Guarani sanitation, housing or economic conditions, the findings clearly underscore their marginal living conditions and thus call attention to the accentuated social and health inequities that continue to exist in Brazil despite governmental efforts to bridge such gaps. The study also indicates that more research is needed to assess ARI in this indigenous population, including the investigation of other possible risk factors that were not assessed here, the aetiology of the disease, plus new avenues for the analysis of the role played by food and nutrition, the environment and indoor air pollutants in respiratory health.
We thank the Guarani people for their support, especially the parents and children who participated in this study. Our thanks also go to the Regional Offices of the Brazilian National Health Foundation – FUNASA in southern Brazil, particularly the nurses and indigenous health agents who dedicated their time to the project. The study was funded by FAPERJ and CNPq.