Colonization of the land by multicellular green plants was a fundamental step in the evolution of life on earth. Land plants evolved from fresh-water aquatic algae, and the transition to a terrestrial environment required the acquisition of developmental plasticity appropriate to the conditions of water availability, ranging from drought to flood. Here we show that extant bryophytes exhibit submergence-induced developmental plasticity, suggesting that submergence responses evolved relatively early in the evolution of land plants. We also show that a major component of the bryophyte submergence response is controlled by the phytohormone ethylene, using a perception mechanism that has subsequently been conserved throughout the evolution of land plants. Thus a plant environmental response mechanism with major ecological and agricultural importance probably had its origins in the very earliest stages of the colonization of the land.
Ethylene and submergence escape responses were first linked in studies of coleoptile growth in rice (Ku et al., 1970) and Callitriche platycarpa (Musgrave et al., 1972), and this linkage has subsequently been observed in many angiosperms (Jackson, 2008). Submergence escape also occurs in non-angiosperms, suggesting that this is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism. For example, in the fern Regnillidium diphyllum and in the aquatic liverwort Riella helicophylla escape is induced by treatment with ethylene (Regnillidium diphyllum) or by a combination of ethylene and auxin (Riella helicophylla) (Musgrave and Walters, 1974; Stange and Osborne, 1988).
The angiosperm ethylene signalling pathway is well understood. Ethylene is perceived by the ETR1 receptor (and homologues). In the absence of ethylene, ETR1 maintains activation of CTR1, which in turn represses ethylene signalling. Binding of ethylene to ETR1 inactivates CTR1, thus de-repressing the activity of EIN3 and EIN3-like transcription factors, which regulate the expression of ethylene-inducible genes such as ERF1 and ERF2 of the AP2/ERF gene family (Stepanova and Alonso, 2009; Yoo et al., 2009). Many ethylene-responsive genes are regulated by AP2/ERF transcription factors. For example, two deepwater rice ERFs, SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2, trigger rapid stem elongation in response to submergence or ethylene, via increased accumulation of the growth-promoting phytohormone gibberellin (GA) (Hattori et al., 2009). In contrast, submergence-induced expression of the tolerance-specific SUB1A ERF confers adaptive responses by regulating metabolic activities and limiting the responsiveness of the plant to GA (Voesenek et al., 2004; Fukao et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2006; Fukao and Bailey-Serres, 2008). Thus, despite employing distinct submergence tolerance strategies, these two different rice strains both use ethylene to regulate submergence response.
Here we investigate the evolutionary conservation of ethylene-mediated submergence responses in land plants, by focusing on the submergence responses of bryophytes and using the moss Physcomitrella patens as a genetic model (Schaefer and Zryd, 1997; Rensing et al., 2008). Because the bryophytes diverged relatively early from the main land-plant lineage (Kenrick and Crane, 1997) they are ideally positioned to assess the conservation of molecular mechanisms. The bryophytes produce ethylene, via an uncertain biosynthetic pathway. Whilst 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) is the ethylene precursor in angiosperms, the ethylene precursor in bryophytes is unclear (Rohwer and Bopp, 1985; Osborne et al., 1995; Banks et al., 2011). However, in addition to the evidence from the older literature (e.g. Stange and Osborne, 1988), there are several recent indications that ethylene is biologically relevant to bryophytes. For example, the P. patens genome encodes proteins resembling angiosperm ethylene signalling components (Rensing et al., 2008; Ishida et al., 2010). In addition, an ethylene-binding activity comparable to that of other land plants is observed in bryophytes and in charophytic (but not chlorophytic) algae (Wang et al., 2006). Sequences potentially encoding ethylene signalling components have also been recognized in charophytic expressed sequence tag (EST) collections (Timme and Delwiche, 2010). This possible development of ethylene function in charophytes may have been crucial for colonization of the land.
Here we show that P. patens exhibits a characteristic submergence response that results in plants that are morphologically distinct from non-submerged controls. By transgenically expressing a mutant form of a putative P. patens ethylene receptor, we first show that P. patens responds to ethylene via an ethylene perception mechanism that has been substantially conserved during the evolution of land plants. Second, we show that the P. patens submergence response is dependent on a functional ethylene perception mechanism. Ethylene-mediated submergence responses are therefore likely to have arisen relatively early in the evolution of land plants.
Physcomitrella patens exhibits a characteristic submergence response
To determine how bryophytes respond to submergence, we grew the moss P. patens for a prolonged time under water. In air, growth of P. patens from small explants of filamentous tissue on an agar-based solid medium results in a radial spread of filaments consisting of a densely packed core region and a peripheral colonizing frontier (Figure 1a). Most of the core comprises photosynthetically active chloronema, whereas the peripheral filaments are faster-growing and less photosynthetically active caulonema. Both types of filament form branches, which mostly develop into chloronema but sometimes into caulonema. Gametophores (leafy shoots) develop on caulonemal filaments during the later stages of plant development. Here we show that P. patens survived months of complete submergence, and growth of P. patens under water causes a pronounced change in this filamentous structure (Figure 1a). Following submergence, growth of core filaments was reduced, resulting in a more sparsely packed core, whereas filamental extension in the periphery was enhanced. The distribution of later-stage leafy shoots reflects this change: in non-submerged plants, leafy shoots form preferentially within the core region whereas in submerged plants, leafy shoots form mainly at the periphery (Figure 1a,b). This shift in growth pattern towards colonizing activity may be an ‘escape’ response to submergence, a response that presumably increases the chances of finding a less flood-prone environment.
Ethylene responses and submergence responses in P. patens share common features
To determine whether ethylene is involved in bryophyte submergence responses, we cultured P. patens in an atmosphere containing ethylene. In these conditions, the core region of the plant was less densely packed with filaments than the control plants (Figure 1c). At the periphery of ethylene-treated plants, filament density was also reduced (Figure 1c). These modifications of filamentous architecture are features shared between ethylene-treated and submerged plants, suggesting that ethylene may be involved in the P. patens submergence response. However, there are subtle differences in appearance between submergence- and ethylene-treated plants. These differences are most likely due to the fact that submerged plants are also exposed to physiological changes such as reduced concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide. To investigate the role of ethylene in the submergence response we focused on the common effects of ethylene and submergence.
Bryophyte genes encode proteins homologous to angiosperm ethylene signalling components
To determine how bryophytes perceive and process the ethylene signal, we sought to identify DNA sequences encoding proteins with high amino acid sequence similarity to components of the angiosperm ethylene signalling pathway. We interrogated the fully sequenced genome of P. patens, EST libraries of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha (K. Ishizaki and T. Kohchi (University of Kyoto, Japan), personal communications.), and genome sequences of the lycophyte, Selaginella moellendorffii (Banks et al., 2011) (Figures 2 and S1–S4 in Supporting Information). Phylogenetic analysis of the identified sequences resolved their relationship to angiosperm homologues (Figures 2 and S1–S4).
blast (Altschul et al., 1997) database searches identified sequences encoding seven putative ethylene receptor proteins in P. patens (Ishida et al., 2010), two in M. polymorpha and four in S. moellendorffii. Two partial EST sequences (tentatively called Kf1 and Sp1) from charophytic algae (Timme and Delwiche, 2010; J. Thierer and C.F. Delwiche (University of Maryland, MD, USA), personal communications.) were also found to encode proteins with amino acid sequence similarity to angiosperm ethylene receptors (Figures 2 and S1). These non-seed plant sequences and algal sequences were included in the phylogenetic analysis to resolve their relationship with the two distinct subfamilies (I and II) of angiosperm ethylene receptors (Hua et al., 1998) (Figure S1). The analysis placed four PpETR sequences, MpETRb and three SmETR sequences within subfamily I, whilst PpETR2, -4 and -5, MpETRa and SmETR4 exhibited greater sequence divergence. This diverged group of ETR sequences are more closely related to subfamily I than to subfamily II (Figure S1b).
The sequences were then analysed in greater detail to assess the presence of two differential subfamily characteristics (Hua et al., 1998); namely, five well-conserved motifs within the histidine kinase domain of subfamily I receptors (Figure 3a), and an N-terminal extension of 10–20 hydrophobic amino acids found in subfamily II receptors. All of the non-seed plant ETR sequences had the well-conserved five signature motifs of subfamily I histidine kinases, and all except MpETRa lacked the N-terminal extension characteristic of subfamily II. This suggests that these sequences identify two classes of non-seed plant ethylene receptors: one belonging to subfamily I, the other being detectably diverged from subfamily I but not having the characteristics of subfamily II. The apparent absence of genes encoding subfamily II ethylene receptors in the fully sequenced genomes of P. patens and S. moellendorffii may suggest that subfamily II was established after the divergence of the lycophytes. The C-terminal receiver domain, found in some (but not all) angiosperm ethylene receptors, was present in all of the non-seed plant sequences analysed here, except for SmETR2.
Figure 2 shows a clade of subfamily I ethylene receptors extracted from the full analysis shown in Figure S1a. The tree topology broadly relates to the overall plant phylogeny, with the algal (charophyte) sequences at a basal position, and bryophyte sequences placed basal to vascular plant sequences. Among the P. patens putative subfamily I ethylene receptors, PpETR7 was selected for the functional analysis described in subsequent sections of this paper. Further phylogenetic analysis provided strong evidence for the existence of genes encoding EIN3, EIL and ERF-type components (Figures S3 and S4), and less compelling evidence for the existence of genes encoding the CTR1 component of ethylene signalling in early land plants (see supplementary text in the Supporting Information legends file (Figures S2–S4) online for further explanation, and Figure S2) (Banks et al., 2011). We next determined whether, despite the possible lack of CTR1 function, a candidate P. patens ethylene receptor (PpETR7) facilitates the response of P. patens to ethylene.
Mutation of the presumed ethylene binding site of PpETR7 inhibits the P. patens ethylene response
To determine if PpETR gene sequences confer the P. patens ethylene responses we took the following approach. The dominant Atetr1-1 mutation confers ethylene insensitivity to AtETR1 (and hence to Arabidopsis thaliana plants) (Bleecker et al., 1988; Schaller and Bleecker, 1995; Hall et al., 1999). The causal amino acid substitution (C65Y) encoded by Atetr1-1 lies in the ethylene-binding domain of AtETR1 and blocks ethylene binding. Since this ethylene-binding domain is highly conserved in PpETR gene sequences, an identical mutation could be introduced at the corresponding position of PpETR7 to generate a Ppetr7-1 allele (Figure 3a). Physcomitrella patens was subsequently transformed with gene constructs expressing the wild-type PpETR7 and mutated Ppetr7-1 sequences under the control of a maize ubiquitin promoter (Harwood et al., 2008), which acts as a strong promoter in P. patens (Figure S5a). Multiple independent transgenic lines were obtained, and genomic integration and expression of transgenes was confirmed (Figure S5b,c).
We next showed that Ppetr7-1 expression altered the accumulation of ethylene-regulated P. patens transcripts (Figure 3b). Wild-type (WT), PpETR7 (PUbi:PpETR7) and Ppetr7-1 (PUbi:Ppetr7-1) expressing lines were cultured in an airflow system with or without ethylene (this treatment having little effect on transgene expression; Figure 3b). Two of the PpERF transcripts identified in Figure S4 were ethylene regulated. PpERFa transcript levels were repressed by ethylene, and whilst this expression pattern was commonly observed in WT and PUbi:PpETR7 lines, it was abolished in PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines (Figure 3b). PpERFb transcripts, on the other hand, were possibly upregulated by ethylene and accumulated to much lower levels in PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines (Figure 3b). These effects of ethylene and Ppetr7-1 expression suggest that ethylene regulates PpERF expression via PpETR7 proteins.
We next compared the effect of PpETR7 and Ppetr7-1 expression on the morphology of P. patens (Figure 4). Whilst ethylene caused PUbi:PpETR7 plants to develop with reduced filamentous density (as described earlier for WT; Figures 1a and 4a), PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines failed to show such morphological changes and thus appeared to have reduced ethylene sensitivity (Figure 4a,b). Given that PUbi:PpETR7 lines remained ethylene sensitive, it is reasonable to conclude that reduced ethylene sensitivity in PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines is conferred by the point mutation they contain. This point mutation alters the likely ethylene-binding domain of PpETR7 and dominantly confers reduced ethylene sensitivity. PpETR7 therefore functions as an ethylene receptor in P. patens.
In addition to reduced ethylene sensitivity, the Ppetr7-1 mutation also conferred a morphological phenotype. PUbi:Ppetr7-1 plants exhibited a significantly higher proportion of caulonemal filaments than WT or PUbi:PpETR7 plants (Figure 4c). At the moment we are unable to suggest an explanation for this phenomenon. Furthermore, PUbi:Ppetr7-1 caulonemal filaments were inhibited in branch development, as their branches were much shorter than those of the WT (Figure 4d–f) while cell size remained unaltered (Figure S6). This property might affect filamentous expansion of the plant as a whole, because PUbi:Ppetr7-1 plants tended to be more compact than WT or PUbi:PpETR7 plants (Figure 4a). These observations suggest that PpETR function may regulate the colonization ability of P. patens.
Treatment with 1-methylcyclopropene alters the filamentous architecture of WT and PUbi:PpETR7 but not PUbi:Ppetr7-1 plants
The effect of reduced ethylene signalling on the filamentous architecture of P. patens was confirmed when 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) was used to chemically block the ethylene binding of ethylene receptors (Sisler and Serek, 1997; Figure 5). This experiment was carried out in a sealed container, in which WT plants spread out their filaments to form an elaborate colonizing apparatus at their periphery. In the presence of 1-MCP, peripheral growth of WT plants was reduced (Figure 5). Thus, treatment of WT plants with 1-MCP resulted in a phenotype resembling that resulting from expression of Ppetr7-1. A similar effect of 1-MCP was observed in PUbi:PpETR7 lines (Figure 5). In contrast, PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines did not detectably change their filamentous architecture when treated with 1-MCP (Figure 5). Possibly, the expression of Ppetr7-1 masks the effect of 1-MCP on the endogenous ethylene receptors of P. patens by saturating the inhibitory effect. Importantly, blocking the binding of ethylene to the receptor, by molecular or chemical means, results in altered filamentous morphology in P. patens, confirming the role of ethylene receptors in regulating the filamentous architecture of P. patens.
Impaired ethylene signalling perturbs the bryophyte submergence response
We next determined if the impaired ethylene signalling conferred by Ppetr7-1 is associated with an alteration in the submergence response of P. patens. Wild type and transgenic P. patens were grown under water (Figure 6a). As previously described (Figure 1a), WT and PUbi:PpETR7 plants responded to submergence by focusing their growth at the peripheral part of the plant (Figure 6a). In contrast, the PUbi:Ppetr7-1 plant continued, following submergence, to form densely packed filaments in the core part of the plant. These differences became particularly clear once leafy shoots had appeared (Figure 6b). Fully expanded leafy shoots were found in the peripheral regions of the submerged WT and PUbi:PpETR7 plants and not in the centre, whilst in non-submerged controls leafy shoots formed at the centre and smaller leafy shoots were found at the periphery (Figure 6b). In contrast, both the submerged and non-submerged PUbi:Ppetr7-1 plants formed leafy shoots throughout the plant structure (leafy shoots remained small in the submerged PUbi:Ppetr7-1). Quantification of the radial growth of plants also supported the reduced effect of submergence stress on PUbi:Ppetr7-1 plants (Figure 6c). Thus the normal submergence-induced change in filamentous architecture exhibited by WT P. patens, a response which may be considered to be an ‘escape’ strategy, is blocked by the reduced ethylene sensitivity conferred by Ppetr7-1. We conclude that ethylene is involved in the regulation of the submergence response in P. patens.
We next investigated the possibility that submergence stimulates ethylene-mediated changes in the regulation of internal water status. Although vascular plants have structural adaptations such as roots and stomata for the regulation of internal water status, bryophytes lack such features in their vegetative gametophytic tissues. Instead, P. patens is thought to regulate internal water status mostly at the cellular level. In plants, movement of cellular water across membranes is regulated by proteins known as aquaporins (Hachez et al., 2006; Lienard et al., 2008; Maurel et al., 2008). Lienard et al. (2008) characterized three PIP2 genes in P. patens, which encode the plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) group of aquaporins, and reported the role of PpPIP2;1 and PpPIP2;2 (but not PpPIP2;3) in the regulation of water permeability of the cell membrane through mutant analysis. They also showed that PpPIP2;1 and PpPIP2;2 are involved in the desiccation tolerance of leafy shoots. Since it is known that aquaporin activity in vascular plants can be regulated at the level of transcript accumulation (as well as at the protein level) (Hachez et al., 2006), we tested PpPIP2 transcript levels in WT and transgenic plants with or without submergence stress. We found that PpPIP2;2 was upregulated in submerged plants of WT and PUbi:PpETR7 lines, but that PpPIP2;2 transcripts were not detectable in PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines (Figure 7a). In contrast, PpPIP2;3 was negatively regulated by submergence in WT and PUbi:PpETR7 lines, whilst increased levels of PpPIP2;3 transcript were observed in both submerged and non-submerged PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines (Figure 7a). Notably, this effect of submergence on PpPIP2;2 and PpPIP2;3 was comparable with that of ethylene (Figure 7b). Expression of PpPIP2;2 and PpPIP2;3 is therefore regulated by both ethylene and submergence, and this regulation is perturbed in PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines. These observations suggest that, upon submergence, ethylene regulates cellular water content through aquaporins, and that this effect is blocked in Ppetr7-1 lines with reduced ethylene sensitivity.
On the other hand, the level of some transcripts appeared to be regulated by submergence stress but not by ethylene. For example, whilst transcripts encoding the basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor PpRSL4 (Menand et al., 2007) accumulated to a higher level in submerged than in control plants, levels of transcripts encoding PpRSL4 remained unaltered by ethylene treatment or by expression of the Ppetr7-1 transgene (Figure 7). Similarly, the level of transcripts encoding the related PpRSL6 protein (Menand et al., 2007) is reduced by submergence treatment and unaffected by ethylene (Figure 7). These observations suggest that whilst ethylene is involved in the submergence response, some aspects of the submergence response are regulated independently of ethylene.
Bryophyte ethylene signalling mediates diverse water-stress responses
Since aquaporins contribute to the maintenance of water status in water deficit and osmotic stress (Lienard et al., 2008; Maurel et al., 2008), we tested the osmotic stress tolerance of WT, PUbi:PpETR7 and PUbi:Ppetr7-1 P. patens, using various concentrations of mannitol. Mannitol caused a reduction of growth in all lines (Figure 8). However, the PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines displayed increased resistance to osmotic stress at the cellular level. PUbi:Ppetr7-1 cells survived 0.6 m and higher concentrations of mannitol, concentrations at which WT and PUbi:PpETR7 cells exhibited almost complete senescence (Figures 8 and S7). Thus reduced ethylene signalling alters the response to osmotic stress, suggesting that ethylene is involved in normal regulation of water status.
Abscisic acid is another phytohormone known to increase the tolerance of bryophytes to desiccation and osmotic stress (Mayaba et al., 2001; Cuming et al., 2007; Khandelwal et al., 2010). To test whether ABA sensitivity was altered in the PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines, WT and transgenic lines were treated with 0 or 10 μm ABA and RNA was extracted for RT-PCR analysis (Figure 9). These studies revealed that the levels of PpPYR1 transcripts (encoding the putative P. patens ABA receptor; Umezawa et al., 2010; Chater et al., 2011) were indistinguishable in WT and transgenic lines. We found that regulation of PpABIA transcripts (which encodes a type 2C protein phosphatase; Komatsu et al., 2009) in response to ABA was unaffected by the expression of PpETR7 or Ppetr7-1 (Figure 9). Similarly, ABA-inducible expression of PpLEA1 transcripts (Kamisugi and Cuming, 2005) was observed in all the lines tested (though the extent of induction is considerably lower in PUbi:PpETR7 lines, Figure 9). Thus, the effect of reduced ethylene-sensitivity on cellular osmotic tolerance does not seem to be due to effects on ABA signalling or response, suggesting that ethylene and ABA may have independent and distinctive roles in the regulation of the response of P. patens to water-deficit stress.
As for the regulation of cellular water content, a tonoplast-localized aquaporin has been shown to be inducible by ABA (Cuming et al., 2007). In our experiments the level of transcripts encoding plasma membrane-localized PpPIP2;3 was down-regulated by ABA in both WT and PUbi:Ppetr7-1 plants (Figure 9). This observation further supports the conclusion that the reduced ethylene sensitivity conferred by expression of Ppetr7-1 does not alter the ABA response. Thus, both ABA and ethylene influence the PpPIP2;3 transcript level, suggesting some overlap in the downstream targets of these two signalling pathways.
Although the bryophytes have long been known to produce ethylene (Rohwer and Bopp, 1985; Osborne et al., 1995), the physiological functions of ethylene in bryophyte biology remained poorly understood. Here we show that ethylene regulates protonemal growth in P. patens, thus modulating filamentous architecture, and that P. patens perceives ethylene using PpETR7, a homologue of angiosperm ethylene receptors. This conclusion is supported by showing that the ethylene-insensitivity mutation etr7-1 blocks ethylene responses in P. patens, and also by a recent report that PpETR1c binds ethylene (Ishida et al., 2010). We also show that expression of the Ppetr7-1 allele alters the ethylene-regulated expression of PpERFs. In Arabidopsis, AtERF1 and other family members regulate ethylene-responsive genes and are themselves regulated by ethylene through the activity of transcription factors such as EIN3 (Solano et al., 1998; Fujimoto et al., 2000). Database searches (see above) revealed that EIN3 is well conserved in bryophytes. Thus, P. patens perceives ethylene via ETR receptors, with resultant regulation of PpERF expression. Future studies will determine the extent to which signalling downstream of the P. patens ethylene receptor is mediated by proteins related to the angiosperm CTR1, EIN3 and ERF proteins.
We next demonstrate the involvement of ethylene in submergence responses in P. patens. We show that ethylene has effects on filamentous architecture and on the expression of aquaporin-encoding PpPIP2;2 and PpPIP2;3 genes in common with the effect of submergence. We also show that the impaired ethylene perception conferred by Ppetr7-1 inhibits submergence responses. However, whilst the PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines failed to produce morphological changes associated with the submergence stress, they survived prolonged submergence similarly to the WT and the PUbi:PpETR7 lines. Additional changes in the WT in response to submergence, such as reduced pigmentation, were also observed in the PUbi:Ppetr7-1 lines. We conclude that the submergence response in P. patens is regulated in part by ethylene. Since the bryophytes are the most distantly related land plants to angiosperms, the link between ethylene and submergence may exist widely among the land plants (see also Musgrave and Walters, 1974; Stange and Osborne, 1988). Thus the regulation of submergence responses by ethylene may be an ancient mechanism that was first established in the land-plant ancestor, and subsequently conserved amongst the land plants.
Physcomitrella patens may also rely on ethylene perception for detecting general water-related stress. Whilst Ppetr7-1 confers altered submergence responses, it also increases cellular osmotic tolerance. It is possible that external water levels are detected via ethylene signalling, such that increased signalling is required for the submergence response and reduced signalling is associated with water deficit stress. Whilst ABA is known to improve tolerance against drought and osmotic stress in P. patens (Cuming et al., 2007; Khandelwal et al., 2010), expression of Ppetr7-1 did not result in altered ABA responses, as shown with ABA-regulated expression of PpABIA and PpLEA1 genes. In angiosperms, ethylene mediates water deficit responses, often through interaction with ABA. For example, ethylene production is repressed by ABA as part of the drought response (Hussain et al., 2000; Spollen et al., 2000), and ABA and ethylene interact antagonistically in Leontodon hispidus to regulate the plant’s sensitivity to water deficit stress (Wilkinson and Davies, 2010). Fukao et al. (2011) demonstrated in rice that an ethylene-inducible ERF protein SUB1A, which, as previously described, confers submergence tolerance, also enhanced tolerance against drought by increasing ABA sensitivity. Given such variation, the interaction between ethylene and ABA may be adaptable and species-specific. In this study, ethylene-insensitivity improved cellular osmotic tolerance of P. patens without altering tested ABA responses, suggesting that ethylene may play a role in osmotic tolerance in P. patens independently of ABA. However, since both ethylene and ABA regulate water relations in P. patens, the precise relationship between these two regulators awaits further study.
Survival of water stress, including submergence and water deficit, will have been a fundamental adaptation required upon land colonization. Since ethylene appears to have regulated the water stress response in ancestral land plants, ethylene signalling could have been one of the mechanisms that enabled plants to colonize the land (Timme and Delwiche, 2010). Plant ethylene receptors have their origins in plastids (Mount and Chang, 2002), but ethylene-binding activity was found only in land plants and charophytes, and not in other algae (Wang et al., 2006). Thus, the biological function of ethylene in plants might have originally evolved in the charophytic algal ancestor of the land plants. The presence of ethylene signalling in charophytes is supported by the finding of EST sequences encoding ethylene signalling components and biosynthesis enzymes in two charophycean species (Timme and Delwiche, 2010). Since the land plants are thought to have evolved from a charophytic algal lineage, recruitment of ethylene to the regulation of the water stress response could have been a pre-requisite for colonization of the land. Subsequently, the adaptability of the ethylene signalling pathway enabled the evolution of strategies to cope with fluctuating water availability, ranging from desiccation to submergence, and other abiotic stresses during the evolution of the land plants.
Diverse adaptations and the physiological and developmental innovations that the land plants evolved are often coordinated with plant growth through the activity of phytohormones. Recent studies are beginning to unravel the degree of evolutionary conservation and modification found in the molecular mechanisms by which phytohormones regulate plant growth. Previous work suggested that GA, a key growth regulator of angiosperms, was not involved in growth regulation in early land plants and evolved relatively recently in the vascular plant lineage (Hirano et al., 2007; Yasumura et al., 2007). On the other hand, Prigge et al. (2010) showed that auxin regulates developmental processes in P. patens, and suggested that the basic auxin perception mechanism was present in the ancestor of land plants. Our present study suggests that the ethylene perception mechanism was also present in that ancestor. These ancient hormonal regulatory systems (auxin and ethylene) have their core functional perception mechanisms well conserved, whilst downstream events are often co-opted to regulate the structures or developmental programs specific to bryophyte or vascular plant lineages.
Plant strains and growth conditions
Physcomitrella patens subsp. patens (Gransden2004 strain) was provided by Yasuko Kamisugi (University of Leeds, UK). Cultures were grown at 25°C with continuous light (60 μmol m−2 sec−1) on BCD medium (Grimsley et al., 1977; without ammonium tartrate supplement), with or without supplements/submergence treatment as indicated. Plants were grown from small explants of filamentous tissue (1 mm diameter) for morphological observation. Tissues for DNA/RNA extraction were grown from fragmented protonema.
Ethylene and 1-MCP treatment
Ethylene was applied at 3 μl L−1 with continuous airflow (1 L min−1) in cuvettes (24 L). Ethylene concentrations in the cuvette were verified by analysing air samples with a gas chromatograph with a photo-ionization detector (Syntech Spectras Analyzer GC955-100; Synspec, http://www.synspec.nl/). To treat plants with 1-MCP, 5 μl L−1 1-MCP (SmartFresh, Rohm and Haas Trading Europe, http://www.rohmhaas.com/) was added in a closed glass container. The growth chamber was kept at 21°C with continuous light of 60 μmol m−2 sec−1.
Leafy shoot measurement
The distance of individual leafy shoots from the centre of the plant was measured on plant pictures with the program ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). Student’s t-test was applied for the statistical test.
Quantification of filamentous growth
The blue channel of the red–green–blue image was used to segment the plant structure as it provides a high-contrast image that is dependent on chlorophyll absorption as a measure of tissue density. A shading correction was used to compensate for uneven illumination across the field and the image inverted to provide a positive estimate of tissue density. Plant structure was accentuated using contrast-limited histogram equalisation (CLAHE; Zuiderveld, 1994) and automatically segmented using an intensity threshold that minimizes interclass variance between the object and background (Otsu, 1979). The intensity-weighted centroid was used to determine the centre of the plant. The integrated intensity and pixel count determined in expanding 500-μm rings following background subtraction of the original intensity image or the segmented image, respectively, provided a profile of the tissue density and surface coverage with radius (Figure S8). Student’s t-test was applied for the statistical test.
Gene identification and isolation
Physcomitrella patens and S. moellendorffii ETR1-, CTR1-, EIN3- and ERF-related sequences were obtained by a blast search of the Physcomitrella genome website (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Phypa1_1/Phypa1_1.home.html), NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Selaginella Genomics (http://selaginella.genomics.purdue.edu/) databases. Marchantia polymorpha sequences were obtained from EST collections held by the Kohchi laboratory (University of Kyoto, Japan). A MpETRa EST fragment was extended to obtain the remaining coding sequences by rapid amplification of cDNA ends or by thermal-asymmetric-interlaced PCR (see Table S1 for primer sequences). Sequences for Spirogyra pratensis and Coleochaete orbicularis were obtained from a database provided by Ruth Timme (Timme and Delwiche, 2010) and those for Klebsormidium flaccidum were obtained from EST collections held by the Delwiche laboratory (University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA).
Amino acid sequence alignments were generated using the programs jalview (http://www.jalview.org/) and bioedit (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html). Automatically generated alignments using the mafft Multiple Sequence Alignment tool (Katoh et al., 2002) were manually adjusted to refine the alignment and remove the regions containing unalignable sequences (see Tables S2–S5 for unedited versions of sequence alignments). The sequence alignments were used to infer Bayesian trees using the program mrbayes v.3.1.2 (http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/index.php), using the WAG substitution matrix. For more information see Methods S1.
Transformation of P. patens
Wild-type PpETR7 coding sequences were PCR-amplified with Pfu turbo polymerase (http://www.genomics.agilent.com/), and cloned into pGEM® T easy (Promega, http://www.promega.com/). This whole plasmid was PCR-amplified using the primers Ppetr7.3F and Ppetr1-1R (Table S1), which resulted in integration of the Ppetr7-1 point mutation within the PpETR7 sequence. The PCR product was then self-ligated to generate Ppetr7-1 in pGEM® T easy. Both PpETR7 and Ppetr7-1 sequences were then cloned into pBRACT211 (http://www.bract.org/bract.html) downstream of a maize ubiquitin promoter (PUbi; Figure S5a). About 10 μg of the plasmid containing the construct PUbi:PpETR7 or PUbi:Ppetr7-1, linearized using NotI and HaeII, was used for each transformation experiment. Physcomitrella patens was transformed after polyethylene glycol-mediated DNA uptake into protoplasts, regenerated and screened for stable transformants essentially according to Schaefer et al. (1991). Transformants were screened by PCR to check for construct integration, followed by DNA gel blot analysis to determine insert copy number (Figure S5b).
Complementary DNA was generated using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, http://www.lifetechnologies.com/) from 4 μg of DNaseI-treated (amplification grade; Life Technologies) total RNA with oligo dT-Anchor (ODTA; see Table S1). Taq polymerase (Life Technologies) was used for PCR, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers used are listed in Table S1. The PCR conditions were: 94°C for 120 sec, 17–28 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 54–57°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 70 sec, and then 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were visualized using SYBR Green (Life Technologies), and the cycle number was adjusted to obtain data during the log phase of PCR amplification (confirmed by checking the amplification status at three different cycle numbers; ±2 cycles of the cycle at which the data were taken; Figure S9). Experiments were repeated using two biological replicates.
We thank Yasuko Kamisugi (University of Leeds, UK) for P. patens; Rob Welschen (Utrecht University, Netherlands) and John Baker (Oxford, UK) for technical assistance; Kimitsune Ishizaki and Takayuki Kohchi (Kyoto, Japan), and Katsuyuki Yamato (Kinki University, Japan) for help with BLAST search and sharing of Marchantia EST data; Ruth Timmes, Jay Thierer and Charles Delwiche (University of Maryland, USA) for help with BLAST search and sharing of charophytic EST data; Mark Smedley (Norwich, UK) for plasmid pBract211, Nuno D. Pires (Zurich, Switzerland) for PpRSL gene primers and Jeremy Solly (Cambridge, UK) for ABA signalling gene primers. This work was supported in part by award no. KUK-I1-002-03 (to NPH) made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), and by British Council Partnership Programme in Science made by the British Council and Platform Bèta Techniek.