The photosynthetic efficiency of C3 plants suffers from the reaction of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) with O2 instead of CO2, leading to the costly process of photorespiration. Increasing the concentration of CO2 around Rubisco is a strategy used by photosynthetic prokaryotes such as cyanobacteria for more efficient incorporation of inorganic carbon. Engineering the cyanobacterial CO2-concentrating mechanism, the carboxysome, into chloroplasts is an approach to enhance photosynthesis or to compartmentalize other biochemical reactions to confer new capabilities on transgenic plants. We have chosen to explore the possibility of producing β-carboxysomes from Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942, a model freshwater cyanobacterium. Using the agroinfiltration technique, we have transiently expressed multiple β-carboxysomal proteins (CcmK2, CcmM, CcmL, CcmO and CcmN) in Nicotiana benthamiana with fusions that target these proteins into chloroplasts, and that provide fluorescent labels for visualizing the resultant structures. By confocal and electron microscopic analysis, we have observed that the shell proteins of the β-carboxysome are able to assemble in plant chloroplasts into highly organized assemblies resembling empty microcompartments. We demonstrate that a foreign protein can be targeted with a 17-amino-acid CcmN peptide to the shell proteins inside chloroplasts. Our experiments establish the feasibility of introducing carboxysomes into chloroplasts for the potential compartmentalization of Rubisco or other proteins.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Intracellular compartmentalization is a general strategy used by organisms to carry out metabolic reactions more efficiently. Several bacteria enclose enzymes within proteinaceous polyhedral bodies, known as bacterial microcompartments (BMCs; Bobik, 2006; Yeates et al., 2008). These microcompartments allow the hosts to overcome unfavorable or challenging metabolic pathways by sequestering volatile or toxic reaction intermediates, or by concentrating a critical substrate nearby an enzyme that has a slow turnover and low affinity for that substrate. Despite their diverse functions, these microcompartments share a common set of homologous protein subunits, which make up the outer shells in a fashion similar to viral capsids (Yeates et al., 2011).
The β-carboxysome from the freshwater cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942 is perhaps the best-characterized bacterial microcompartment. It contains two enzymes fundamental to photosynthesis, namely ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) and carbonic anhydrase, and forms an important part of the cyanobacterial CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM; Yeates et al., 2008; Rae et al., 2013). Although essential to photosynthesis, Rubisco catalyzes two competing reactions involving the enediol form of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP). These are the productive carboxylation of RuBP by CO2 and the wasteful oxygenation of RuBP by molecular oxygen, initiating photorespiration (Long, 1991). Carboxysomes increase the concentration of CO2 around the catalytic site of Rubisco, promoting the carboxylase activity and consequently suppressing the undesired reaction with oxygen (Cannon et al., 2001; Price et al., 2008; Whitney et al., 2011).
A reasonable model for the arrangement of protein components in this β-carboxysome has been proposed (Rae et al., 2013). The protein constituents of β-carboxysomes can be broadly classified as components involved in the formation of either the icosahedral shell or the internal structure. The shell is composed of multiple copies of single BMC domain proteins (Pfam00936), such as CcmK2, CcmK3 and CcmK4, and tandem BMC domain proteins (CcmO and CcmP), which contain two tandem repeats of BMC domains (Kinney et al., 2011; Yeates et al., 2011). The crystal structures of single and tandem BMC proteins showed that they form hexameric and pseudo-hexameric units, respectively, which oligomerize, forming the facets of the carboxysome shell (Kerfeld et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2009; Cai et al., 2013). Another component of the shell, CcmL, contains a Pfam03319 protein domain. The crystal structure revealed that CcmL is able to form pentamers, and is thought to define the vertices between adjacent facets in the icosahedral shells (Tanaka et al., 2008; Keeling et al., 2014). These shell proteins are distinguished by their pores, which have different sizes and properties, and are believed to regulate the flux of metabolites into and out of the carboxysome (Kinney et al., 2011).
The proteins encoded by ccmM and ccmN participate in the internal organization of β-carboxysomes. In S. elongatus, CcmM is present in two isoforms, a 58-kDa isoform (CcmM58) and a shorter 35-kDa isoform (CcmM35), which is synthesized from an internal ribosome entry site (Price et al., 1998; Long et al., 2005). CcmM58 has a C-terminal domain containing three copies of a protein domain similar to the small subunit of Rubisco (SSU-like domain) and an N terminus similar to γ-carbonic anhydrase, whereas CcmM35 contains only three SSU-like domains (Price et al., 1993; Ludwig et al., 2000). CcmM58 localizes immediately below the shell and has been shown to interact with the shell proteins such as CcmK2, as well as the internal components such as CcmN, Rubisco and carbonic anhydrase (Cot et al., 2008; Long et al., 2010; Kinney et al., 2012). In contrast, CcmM35 is believed to be involved in the organization of Rubisco within the lumen of the β-carboxysome (Rae et al., 2013). CcmN is another essential protein that recruits the shell components to a nucleus of Rubisco complexes during the assembly of new carboxysomes (Cameron et al., 2013). The CcmN protein is characterized by the presence of an N-terminal domain, which interacts with CcmM58, and an approximately 20-amino-acid C-terminal peptide, which interacts with CcmK2 (Kinney et al., 2012).
One possible strategy to enhance photosynthesis is to transfer components of a cyanobacterial CCM into the chloroplasts of C3 crops, in order to increase photosynthetic carbon fixation and reduce photorespiration (Price et al., 2013; Zarzycki et al., 2013). A recent theoretical analysis estimated that the engineering of carboxysomes into chloroplasts in combination with the addition of a bicarbonate ion transporter and the removal of stromal carbonic anhydrase could increase the crop yield by over 30% (McGrath and Long, 2014). Despite the great potential of carboxysomes for improved carbon-fixing efficiency in higher plants, there has been no report so far on the heterologous expression of proteins from the β-carboxysome or other BMCs in eukaryotic organisms.
In this work, we use a transient expression method to explore the possibility of transferring components of β-carboxysomes from Synechococcus PCC7942 into plant chloroplasts. Agroinfiltration of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves gave rise to high levels of protein expression, demonstrating that carboxysomal proteins can be produced in plant cells and correctly targeted into the chloroplast stroma when fused to a chloroplast transient peptide. The application of both fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy, in combination with immunogold labeling, enabled the visualization of assemblies of carboxysomal proteins in the chloroplast stroma.
All carboxysomal proteins expressed in this study were fused with the N-terminal chloroplast transit peptide from the Arabidopsis recA gene (Köhler et al., 1997). Imaging analyses indicate that all the proteins were correctly targeted to chloroplast stroma.
Transient expression of CcmK2-YFP in N. benthamiana leaves
When yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged CcmK2 (CcmK2-YFP) was expressed and targeted to the chloroplasts of N. benthamiana, elongated structures were visualized by fluorescent microscopy (Figure 1a). Co-expression of CcmK2-YFP with other carboxysomal proteins did not alter these elongated fluorescent signals. We hypothesize that fusing YFP to the much smaller CcmK2 protein causes the CcmK2 subunits to assemble incorrectly, leading to these elongated structures and preventing proper interactions with other carboxysomal proteins. Hence, subsequent experiments were performed with CcmK2 lacking a YFP tag.
Transient expression in N. benthamiana leaves of CcmO, CcmK2, CcmL and CcmM58
When CcmO-YFP was targeted to chloroplasts, diffuse YFP signals were observed; alternatively, in some cases, polar aggregations were seen, probably because of very high protein levels (Figure 1b,c). We co-expressed CcmO-YFP with each of the other β-carboxysomal shell proteins, namely CcmK2, CcmK3, CcmK4 and CcmL. We found that only in the presence of CcmK2 was CcmO-YFP able to produce punctate fluorescent loci (Figure 1d,e), indicating the possible assembly of CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP. Punctate fluorescent signals were consistently produced when additional proteins such as CcmL and CcmM58 were co-expressed with CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP (Figure 1f).
In order to further resolve the structures formed by these punctate signals, the plant material was characterized at high resolution by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Two different protocols of preparation of plant tissue were used: conventional chemical fixation at 20°C; and high-pressure freeze fixation (HPF)/freeze substitution in combination with immunogold labeling. In leaves expressing CcmO-YFP alone, large protein aggregates were observed (Figure 2a,d). Interestingly, when CcmO-YFP was expressed in combination with CcmK2, protein arrays organized into parallel linear structures were observed (Figure 2b,e). This result indicates that CcmO-YFP is not able to self-assemble into discrete structures, but when CcmK2 is present, the two carboxysomal proteins can interact, forming ordered assemblies - possibly sheets or stacked arrays of carboxysomal facets. Immunolabeling experiments using an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to 10-nm gold particles supported the presence of carboxysomal proteins in these structures (Figure 2d,e).
When we expressed another component of the shell, CcmL-YFP, along with CcmO-YFP and CcmK2, circular structures were observed (Figure 2c,f–i). The same outcome was observed using either form of sample preparation: conventional chemical fixation or HPF fixation. Immunogold experiments using anti-GFP (Figure 2f,g), anti-CcmK2 (Figure 2h) and anti-CcmO (Figure 2i) antisera confirmed the presence of CcmO and CcmK2 in these circular structures.
A size determination and a schematic representation of these structures are illustrated in Figure 3. They are round and slightly elongated, but some angular structures have been observed in high-quality plant material fixed by HPF (Figure 2g). They measure 100–110nm in length and 80–90 nm in width. These carboxysome-like structures are surrounded by a double shell, with a space in between. The external shell measures about 5–6 nm in thickness, which is a value similar to that reported for a β-carboxysome shell (Kaneko et al., 2006). In contrast, the structure of the second shell is difficult to resolve because it appears less thick and disorganized. An inner cavity surrounded by the double shell constitutes the internal part of the circular structure.
In the same plant material (expressing CcmO-YFP, CcmK2 and CcmL-YFP), other types of structures were observed as well as the round structures described above (Figure 4). Elongated (Figure 4a,d) and disorganized structures (Figure 4b,e) were observed, which probably result from different ratios of carboxysomal proteins (CcmO-YFP, CcmK2 and CcmL-YFP), the proportions of which are likely to be heterogeneous within agroinfiltrated leaves. The presence of structures that are intermediate between a round and elongated shape may also reflect the importance of having an optimal ratio of carboxysomal proteins for carboxysome biogenesis (Figure 4c,f).
In plant material expressing CcmM58-YFP in combination with CcmO-YFP and CcmK2, round structures were observed (Figure 5a). Immunolabeling experiments using antibodies against GFP (Figure 5b), CcmK2 (Figure 5c), CcmO (Figure 5d) and CcmM58 (Figure 5e) confirmed the presence of all these proteins. This result supports the interpretation that sheets of CcmO-YFP/CcmK2 proteins form complex structures in the presence of CcmM58. In addition to the round structures, elongated structures were observed in some chloroplasts in plants agroinfiltrated with constructs expressing CcmM58-YFP, CcmO-YFP and CcmK2 (Figure 5f,g). The elongated structures were organized into semicrystalline arrays of parallel lines, spaced 8–9 nm apart, that intersect, forming a net structure (Figure 5f,g). A similar organization of carboxysomal proteins in β-carboxysomes has been described by others (Kaneko et al., 2006). Immunolabeling experiments using antibodies against GFP, CcmK2, CcmO and CcmM58 also confirmed the presence of these carboxysomal proteins in elongated structures (Figure S1).
In plant material expressing CcmO-YFP, CcmK2, CcmL and CcmM58-YFP together, we observed the same type of carboxysome-like and elongated structures described for the CcmO-YFP, CcmK2 and CcmM58-YFP plant material (Figure 5h,i). Immunolabeling experiments with an anti-GFP antibody supported the presence of the carboxysomal proteins.
CcmN contains a 17-amino-acid peptide that can target YFP to the structures formed by CcmK2/CcmO-YFP
We also co-expressed CcmN, an internal protein of β-carboxysomes, with CcmK2 and CcmO. When expressed alone, CcmN-CFP gave diffuse CFP signals (Figure 6a). When CcmN-CFP was co-expressed with CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP, both CcmN-CFP and CcmO-YFP gave punctate signals, which co-localized to the same areas in chloroplasts, suggesting that CcmN was able to associate with the structures composed of CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP (Figure 6b–d). When we removed the C-terminal 17-amino-acid peptide of CcmN and fused the truncated CcmN to CFP, the resulting protein fusion, CcmNd17-CFP, no longer co-localized with the punctate structures of CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP (Figure 6e,f). This finding is consistent with a recent report that demonstrated that CcmN interacts with CcmK2 through its C-terminal 17-amino-acid peptide (CcmN17; Kinney et al., 2012).
In order to test the ability of the CcmN17 peptide to target a foreign protein to the structures formed by CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP, we co-expressed CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP with CcmN17-CFP, where the CFP was fused to the C terminus of CcmN17. But the CcmN17-CFP fluorescent signals were diffuse and did not co-localize with the punctate signals of CcmO-YFP (Figure S2). We hypothesize that the CFP fused to the C terminus of CcmN17, or that the 15-amino-acid scar peptide that remained at the N terminus of CcmN17, after the truncation of the chloroplast transit peptide, interfered with the interaction between CcmN17 and CcmK2. When we fused the N17 C-terminal peptide and YFP to the N terminus of CcmN17 and co-expressed it with CcmK2 and CcmO-CFP, both YFP-CcmN17 and CcmO-CFP fluorescent signals co-localized to punctate spots within chloroplasts (Figures 6g,h). Thus, the C-terminal 17-amino-acid peptide of CcmN (CcmN17) is critical for the binding of CcmN to the structures of CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP, and the CcmN17 peptide by itself is enough to target a foreign protein to the shell proteins of β-carboxysomes; however, we were not able to observe the formation of any specific structures in the leaf tissues expressing CcmN or CcmN17 with CcmK2 and CcmO by TEM (Figure S3).
In this study, we used the well-established agroinfiltration technique to express transiently several protein components of the β-carboxysome in chloroplasts of N. benthamiana. We fused several of these proteins with YFP or CFP, which allowed us to monitor the formation of protein assemblies at the resolution of visible light. We found that fusing YFP to a much smaller shell protein of β-carboxysome, CcmK2, gave rise to elongated structures, and that co-expressing it with other shell proteins did not seem to alter these elongated structures. CcmK2 is the major shell component of β-carboxysomes, and has a high tendency to self-polymerize (Samborska and Kimber, 2012). YFP fusion is likely to cause distortion in the assembly of CcmK2 subunits, leading to artificially elongated structures, and preventing CcmK2 from forming normal interactions with other carboxysomal proteins. It was recently reported that CcmK2-YFP by itself could not substitute for the native unlabeled protein in the ΔccmK2 cyanobacterial strain, and that it could only interact with other carboxysomal components in the presence of unlabeled CcmK2 (Cameron et al., 2013). Thus, the subsequent experiments were carried out without YFP fused to CcmK2. Although we did not observe any interference with the proper protein–protein interactions with YFP fused to other components, such as CcmO and CcmM58, we should caution that such fusions might disrupt other structural or functional aspects of β-carboxysomes. Fluorescent protein-labeled CcmK4 and RbcL in previous studies did not disrupt the structure or function of carboxysomes, as long as unlabeled versions were also present (Cameron et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2013).
Probably because of non-specific interactions, large protein aggregates were observed in agroinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaves expressing the fluorescently tagged carboxysome shell protein, CcmO-YFP, whereas co-expression of CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP gave rise to more organized, parallel structures. CcmO and CcmK2 are presumably the main components in the formation of the faces of the carboxysome shell (Rae et al., 2012). Evidently CcmO-YFP alone is not able to self-assemble in a recognisable fashion, but in the presence of CcmK2, the two proteins can polymerize to form sheets that could represent arrays of shell faces. This finding is in agreement with a recent report suggesting that CcmO was unable to assemble with other components in the absence of CcmK2 (Cameron et al., 2013).
When we added CcmL-YFP, the component involved in the formation of vertices of carboxysome shells (Tanaka et al., 2008), round structures resembling carboxysome shells were observed. This result supports the notion that CcmL provides the requisite curvature for the formation of the icosahedral structure of the carboxysome, and is in line with recent work suggesting that CcmK2, CcmO and CcmL constitute the minimal structural determinants of the outer shells of β-carboxysome (Rae et al., 2012). Circular structures that we observed in chloroplasts appear to be defined by a double shell, which contains an internal cavity. Probably the presence of a double shell represents a thermodynamically stable conformation of a combination of CcmO-YFP, CcmK2 and CcmL-YFP in the absence of the other internal components, such as the cyanobacterial Rubisco. Indeed, CcmK2 has recently been shown to form a double-layered shell in the absence of other protein components (Samborska and Kimber, 2012).
These carboxysome-like structures are more frequently round and smaller than a normal β-carboxysome shell, but in some cases internal angular structures have been noted in particularly well-preserved plant preparations observed using the HPF fixation technique (Figure 2g). The oval-shaped structures measure 100–110 nm in length and 80–90 nm in width, whereas the diameter of a β-carboxysome from Synechococcus PCC7942 is ~175 nm (Rae et al., 2013). The smaller size and less angular architecture of the outer shell are probably caused by the absence of other important components of the shell and of the carboxysome interior. It has been demonstrated recently that cyanobacterial Rubisco plays a central role in carboxysome nucleation, together with the two isoforms of CcmM, during the biogenesis of β-carboxysomes (Cameron et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2013). Only after nucleation does the shell form around this ‘procarboxysome’ via interactions with CcmN, which links the shell to the internal parts (Cameron et al., 2013). This recently uncovered assembly process distinguishes β-carboxysome from other bacterial microcompartments, such as α-carboxysome and propanediol utilization metabolosome, which are generally known to be able to form empty compartments in the absence of lumen proteins (Menon et al., 2008; Parsons et al., 2010; Choudhary et al., 2012). Nevertheless, at high concentration levels CcmK2 was able to form well-defined bodies ranging from 100 to 300 nm in size, and could interact with CcmL in vitro (Keeling et al., 2014). The spherical structures observed in this study are more uniform in size and appear more organized, probably because of the presence of additional components, such as CcmO and CcmM58.
In N. benthamiana leaves expressing the three carboxysomal proteins CcmO-YFP, CcmK2 and CcmL-YFP, elongated structures and disorganized structures were also observed (Figures 5h,i and S1d–f). These are probably the result of different ratios of the three carboxysomal proteins. The quantity of each protein expressed transiently from T-DNA will vary in different cells, depending on how much T-DNA from each strain enters the cell as well as how much RNA is transcribed and translated. Furthermore, different carboxysomal proteins may vary in stability. We speculate that elongated structures are the result of CcmO-YFP and CcmK2 polymerization in the presence of suboptimal quantities of CcmL. In contrast, perhaps when CcmL is present at an appropriate concentration, carboxysome-like structures can be formed. This result is supported by studies performed in cyanobacteria where elongated carboxysomes were observed in ΔccmL mutants (Cai et al., 2009; Cameron et al., 2013). Our data indicate that proper levels of expression of the different carboxysome proteins from stably integrated genes will be essential for the formation of carboxysomes with structures akin to those observed in cyanobacteria.
Overexpression of carboxysomal proteins as well as an absence of sufficient expression can also be inimical to the formation of proper microcompartments. Even when combinations of carboxysomal proteins gave rise to more than one type of structure, only a single morphological type was observed in each chloroplast, probably because of the particular level of expression of the carboxysomal proteins in each chloroplast. Elongated and disorganized structures were observed only in what appeared to be ‘sick’ chloroplasts (those with unusual chloroplast morphology). The circular, carboxysome-like structures were observed more frequently in chloroplasts with characteristic chloroplast morphology, probably because of a suitable level of expression of carboxysomal proteins.
We also observed round structures and elongated structures in plant material expressing CcmO-YFP, CcmK2 and CcmM58-YFP. These results raise two interesting issues. First, it suggests there is direct interaction between CcmM58 and the shell formed by CcmK2 and CcmO, as it is likely that such interaction gives the driving force to organize CcmO-YFP/CcmK2 sheets into round structures. This finding should not be surprising because a previous yeast two-hybrid experiment suggested the binding of CcmK2 to CcmM58 (Cot et al., 2008); however, CcmN, which is also known to interact with CcmM58, has been shown to bind CcmK2 through a short C-terminal peptide, and is essential for recruiting the shell to the aggregation of Rubisco complexes with other components (Kinney et al., 2012; Cameron et al., 2013). If the CcmN is the main protein bridging the shell with other internal components, the interaction between CcmK2 and CcmM58 seems redundant. It is also possible that the lack of other stronger binding partners such as Rubisco, carbonic anhydrase and CcmN enables CcmM58 to interact with CcmK2. Second, although CcmL seems to play an essential role in the formation of circular microcompartments when it is co-expressed with CcmK2 and CcmO, it is not necessary when CcmM58 is also present. CcmL is believed to occupy the vertices of icosahedral-shaped carboxysomes, and the mostly elongated structures observed in the ΔccmL cyanobacteria supported such a role for CcmL (Cameron et al., 2013); however, in the case of α-carboxysomes, the deletion of CcmL homologs did not disrupt their shapes (Cai et al., 2009). Our results highlight the heterogeneity of structures that can arise from missing components. As most of the internal components were absent in our samples, it is possible that the structures observed arise from an assembly process that is completely different from a natural one.
Interestingly, we could not detect round structures or elongated assemblies in the samples co-expressing CcmN or CcmN17 with CcmK2 and CcmO. Although the fluorescence fusions indicated that CcmN and CcmN17 are able to co-localize with these shell proteins, the lack of formation of any specific structure suggests that CcmN by itself cannot arrange the shell components into more organized structures without CcmM58 or CcmL.
Bacterial microcompartments, including carboxysomes, have been proposed for biotechnological applications in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering because of their unique abilities to enclose specific enzymatic pathways (Corchero and Cedano, 2011; Frank et al., 2013). Short N-terminal peptides from several internal components of propanediol utilization microcompartment (Pdu MCP) from Salmonella enterica have been demonstrated to be able to encapsulate foreign proteins such as GFP, glutathione-S-transferase and maltose-binding protein within Pdu MCP (Fan et al., 2010, 2012; Fan and Bobik, 2011). A similar shell-targeting signal sequence was also reported to target EGFP and β-galactosidase to the recombinant ethanolamine utilization (eut) bacterial microcompartment shell proteins expressed in Escherichia coli (Choudhary et al., 2012). Recently, a homologous 17-amino-acid peptide located at the C terminus of CcmN has been identified that can interact with CcmK2 in a similar fashion (Kinney et al., 2012). Here, we showed that CcmN was able to co-localize with CcmK2 and CcmO-YFP in chloroplasts through the same C-terminal peptide (CcmN17). In addition, our work also demonstrates that the CcmN17 signal sequence alone is able to cause co-localization of a foreign protein, YFP, with the carboxysomal shell proteins, CcmK2 and CcmO, inside the chloroplasts. The results in our study present an exciting potential of β-carboxysome shells for synthetic biology and biotechnological applications in higher plants.
The current work describes the recombinant heterologous expression of β-carboxysomal proteins in higher plant chloroplasts. Previously, the propanediol utilization microcompartment from Citrobacter freundii and ethanolamine utilization microcompartment from Salmonella enterica have been successfully engineered in E. coli (Parsons et al., 2008, 2010; Choudhary et al., 2012). Bonacci et al. heterologously produced α-carboxysomes from Halothiobacillus neapolitanus in E. coli and demonstrated that the recombinant microcompartments were capable of fixing CO2 (Bonacci et al., 2012). By expressing CcmO-YFP and CcmK2 in combination with CcmL-YFP and/or CcmM58-YFP, we observed discrete structures with characteristics similar to β-carboxysomes. Therefore, this work provides evidence that specific combinations of carboxysomal proteins can assemble within the chloroplast stroma. These experiments are the first step towards the expression of a complete cyanobacterial carboxysome-based carbon-concentrating mechanism in vascular plants, in order to enhance photosynthetic performance.
Plant expression vector construction
The Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942 ccmK2, ccmL and ccmO genes were amplified from E. coli expression vectors containing the respective coding regions, kindly provided by Cheryl Kerfeld (Michigan State University). Synthetic ccmN, ccmM58, ccmK3, ccmK4 and yfp genes, designed to mimic the codon usage of the chloroplast protein expression system, were synthesized by Bioneer (http://www.bioneer.com). Each carboxysomal gene was fused with the chloroplast transit peptide from the Arabidopsis recA gene (Köhler et al., 1997).
Table S1 contains the primers used in the overlap extension PCR procedure (Horton et al., 1989) to generate the ctp::ccm gene fusion constructs with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific, http://www.thermoscientific.com). The PCR products were first cloned into pCR8/GW/TOPO TA vector (Life Technologies, http://www.lifetechnologies.com) and subsequently transferred to the pEXSG-YFP Gateway destination vector, which has the tandem CaMV 35S promoter (P35SS) and the YFP or CFP gene placed 5′ and 3′ of the Gateway recombination cassette, respectively (Jakoby et al., 2006), through a standard Gateway® LR recombination reaction. Thus, each resulting vector contains a carboxysomal gene driven by P35SS, fused to the YFP or CFP gene at the 3′ end, as shown in Figure S4(a).
In order to express one or two additional carboxysomal genes from single vectors, nuclear expression operons driven by ubiquitin-10 (Puq10) and MAS (Pmas) promoters (Langridge et al., 1989; Grefen et al., 2010) were constructed with the overlap extension PCR procedure using the primers listed in Table S1. These operons were then inserted into the AscI site located 5′ of the tandem CaMV 35S promoter in the pEXSG-YFP vectors (Figure S4b). The attB2 segment located between the carboxysomal gene and the YFP or CFP gene in these vectors gives rise to a 15-amino-acid Gateway linker peptide (KGEFDPAFLYKVVDG) upon translation, which should provide sufficient separation between the carboxysomal protein domains and the fluorescent domain. In operons driven by the ubiquitin-10 or MAS promoter, we added a 9- or 12-amino-acid flexible linker peptide made up of GGS repeats between the YFP and carboxysomal proteins in order to minimize the influence of the YFP fusion on the molecular interactions among carboxysomal proteins. The expression vectors created in this work and their features are summarized in Table 1. The YFP and CFP used in this study are EYFP and mCerulean versions, and their amino-acid sequences are included in Data S1.
Table 1. The plant expression vectors with β-carboxysomal genes created in this study
Each expression vector was electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101/pMP90RK (Koncz and Schell, 1986) and transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing carbenicillin, kanamycin and gentamycin.
Transient expression of carboxysomal proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana
For transient expression of carboxysomal proteins in N. benthamiana leaf tissues, agroinoculation was performed as described previously (Sparkes et al., 2006). About 5 ml of each agrobacterial culture grown to the late log phase was pelleted, re-suspended in 10 mm 2- (N-morpholine)-ethanesulphonic acid (MES) buffer, pH 5.6, with 10 mm MgCl2 and 150 μm acetosyringone to an optical density of 0.3–0.5, and incubated in the dark at 28°C for 2–5 h. Leaves from 4–6-week-old N. benthamiana plants grown at 10 h of light per day at ~50 μmol m−2 sec−1 of light intensity, at around 22°C, were infiltrated with the agrobacterial suspension on the abaxial side using a needle-less syringe. In some cases, a suspension of agrobacteria carrying the gene for the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV) was also co-infiltrated to improve the expression levels and duration of carboxysomal proteins (Voinnet et al., 2003). Within 2–4 days after agroinfiltration, the leaf tissues were examined with a confocal microscope or fixed for immunogold labeling and transmission electron microscopy, as described below.
Laser scanning confocal microscopy was performed on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope through a 25× multi-immersion objective. The 458-, 488- and 514-nm lines of an argon laser were used to excite CFP, chlorophyll and YFP, respectively. All the imaging experiments were carried out in sequential mode in order to minimize the spectral bleed-through from undesired fluorophores. The images were collected and processed with either zen 2009 or 2010 microscope software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, http://www.zeiss.com/microscopy).
Chemical fixation, dehydration and embedding
Sections of leaf tissue 2 × 2 mm were excised from leaves using a sterile razor blade and incubated in primary fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.05 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) for 2 h in low vacuum, over ice, with rotation. The samples were washed three times in 0.05 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, and then incubated in the second fixative (1% osmium tetroxide in 0.05 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) for 4 h over ice with rotation. The tissue was washed in 0.05 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, to remove all trace of osmium tetroxide and dehydrated through an acetone series, 30, 50, 70 and 90% (v/v) acetone in water (10 min each incubation), and then three times in 100% dry acetone (30 min each incubation), all at 20°C. Finally, the samples were embedded through increasing concentration of Spürr resin (TAAB), 30, 50, 70 to 100% v/v of resin in acetone, and then polymerized overnight at 60°C (Hulskamp et al., 2010).
Cryofixation using a high pressure freezer, freeze substitution and embedding
Disks of leaf tissue (5 mm in diameter) were taken using a punch and then incubated in 150 mm sucrose for 8 min under low vacuum, in order to fill the intercellular spaces. The disks were transferred to the cavity of Leica Microsystems (http://www.leica-microsystems.com/) aluminum Type B Specimen carriers that are 6.0 × 0.5mm, pre-coated with 1-hexadecene and containing 150 mM sucrose as cryo-protectant. One side of the planchette is flat and there is a cylinder-shaped indentation on the other side of 5 × 0.3mm. The flat side of a second carrier was used as a lid. This plant material was then cryo-fixed using a high-pressure freezer unit at a rate of 20 000 Kelvins/sec (EM HPM100; Leica Microsystems).
For the second step of freeze substitution, the HPF tissue was transferred to 5-ml plastic pots containing a solution of 0.5% uranyl acetate in dry acetone pre-cooled in liquid nitrogen. The freeze substitution process was carried out in an EM AFS unit (Leica Microsystems) at −85°C for 48 h, followed by a linear warm up to −60°C for 5 h. After 1 h, samples were washed using dry ethanol to remove all trace of uranyl acetate. The samples were then infiltrated at low temperature using Lowicryl HM20 resin (Polysciences, http://www.polysciences.com). This step was performed at −60°C by increasing the concentration of resin, from 30, 50, 70 to 100% v/v HM20, in dry ethanol, with 1 h for each incubation. Finally, the samples were transferred to aluminium moulds and polymerized at −50°C for 24 h using a UV lamp (Hillmer et al., 2012).
Ultrathin sections (60–90 nm) were cut from the polymerised blocks on a Reichert–Jung Ultrmicrotome, and collected on gold grids. These were incubated in blocking solution (1% w/v BSA in PBS buffer) for 1 h, and then treated for 1 h with a blocking solution containing the primary antibody. Different primary antibodies against GFP (rabbit polyclonal to GFP; abcam, http://www.abcam.com) and different carboxysomal proteins were tested: rabbit polyclonal antibodies against CcmK2, CcmO, CcmM, CcmN and cyanobacteria Rubisco (Cambridge Research Biochemicals, http://www.crbdiscovery.com). The grids carrying the sections were washed three times in blocking solution and then incubated for 1 h in blocking solution containing a secondary antibody conjugated with 10-nm gold particles (goat polyclonal antibody to rabbit IgG, 10-nm gold conjugated; abcam). The excess of secondary antibody was removed by washing three times in blocking solution and then washing three times in distilled water.
Transmission electron microscopy
Grids carrying ultrathin sections of both embedded samples, cryo-fixed and chemically fixed, were post stained using 2% (w/v) aqueous solution of uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Images were obtained using a transmission electron microscope JEM 2011 FasTEM Jeol UK operating at 200 kV, equipped with a Gatan Ultrascan 1000 CCD camera and a Gatan Dual Vision 300 CCD camera.
We thank Dr Cheryl Kerfeld for providing us with vectors harboring ccmK2, ccmL and ccmO genes, and the genomic DNA extracted from Synechococcus elongatus PCC7942. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number EF-1105584 to M.R.H., Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council under grant number BB/I024488/1 to M.A.J.P. and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number F32GM103019 to M.T.L.