The paper is presented in the authors' personal capacities and opinions expressed therein should be attributed to the authors and do not represent positions or opinions of the WTO, the OECD or their respective Members. The authors wish to thank Michael Handel, Elif Koksal-Oudot, Pascal Marianna and Bo Werth for their help and an anonymous referee for useful comments.
Article first published online: 22 DEC 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
The World Economy
Volume 36, Issue 2, pages 194–212, February 2013
How to Cite
Lanz, R., Miroudot, S. and Nordås, H. K. (2013), Offshoring of Tasks: Taylorism Versus Toyotism. World Economy, 36: 194–212. doi: 10.1111/twec.12024
- Issue published online: 13 FEB 2013
- Article first published online: 22 DEC 2012
This paper contributes to the recent debate on trade in tasks, drawing on insights from the theory of the firm as well as recent developments in trade theory. Recent empirical literature suggests that between 20 and 30 per cent of all jobs in key OECD countries could be digitised and offshored. This study offers a cluster analysis which documents that offshorable and non-offshorable tasks tend to be performed together across occupations. Therefore, when assessing the offshorability of a job, one needs to take into account all tasks being performed by the worker and the gains from fragmenting jobs versus the benefits of multi-tasked workers (taylorism versus toyotism). Furthermore, one needs to distinguish between fragmentation of production and fragmentation of jobs.