Sources of Funding: This study was supported by ‘Gesellschaft zur Förderung Kynologischer Forschung e.V.’.
Comparison of three different sampling methods for canine skin lipids
Version of Record online: 7 MAR 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Veterinary Dermatology © 2013 ESVD and ACVD
Volume 24, Issue 2, pages 233–e51, April 2013
How to Cite
Angelbeck-Schulze, M., Stahl, J., Brodesser, S., Rohn, K., Naim, H., Hewicker-Trautwein, M., Kietzmann, M., Bäumer, W. and Mischke, R. (2013), Comparison of three different sampling methods for canine skin lipids. Veterinary Dermatology, 24: 233–e51. doi: 10.1111/vde.12015
Conflict of Interest: No conflicts of interest have been declared.
- Issue online: 7 MAR 2013
- Version of Record online: 7 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 11 DEC 2012
|vde12015-sup-0001-TableS2a.doc||Word document||47K||Table S1. (a) Comparison of the lipid fractions between the inguinal region and the caudal back stratified by sampling method. (b) Comparison of the ceramide classes between the inguinal region and the caudal back stratified by sampling method.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.