A Brucellosis Disease Control Strategy for the Kakheti Region of the Country of Georgia: An Agent-Based Model

Authors

  • K. A. Havas,

    Corresponding author
    1. Animal Population Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
    • Correspondence:

      K. A. Havas. Animal Population Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Tel.: 607 351 8328; Fax: 970 297 4321; E-mail: Karyn.havas@gmail.com

    Search for more papers by this author
  • R. B. Boone,

    1. Natural Resources Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A. E. Hill,

    1. California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • M. D. Salman

    1. Animal Population Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Summary

Brucellosis has been reported in livestock and humans in the country of Georgia with Brucella melitensis as the most common species causing disease. Georgia lacked sufficient data to assess effectiveness of the various potential control measures utilizing a reliable population-based simulation model of animal-to-human transmission of this infection. Therefore, an agent-based model was built using data from previous studies to evaluate the effect of an animal-level infection control programme on human incidence and sheep flock and cattle herd prevalence of brucellosis in the Kakheti region of Georgia. This model simulated the patterns of interaction of human–animal workers, sheep flocks and cattle herds with various infection control measures and returned population-based data. The model simulates the use of control measures needed for herd and flock prevalence to fall below 2%. As per the model output, shepherds had the greatest disease reduction as a result of the infection control programme. Cattle had the greatest influence on the incidence of human disease. Control strategies should include all susceptible animal species, sheep and cattle, identify the species of brucellosis present in the cattle population and should be conducted at the municipality level. This approach can be considered as a model to other countries and regions when assessment of control strategies is needed but data are scattered.

Ancillary