Notice: Wiley Online Library will be unavailable on Saturday 27th February from 09:00-14:00 GMT / 04:00-09:00 EST / 17:00-22:00 SGT for essential maintenance. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Corresponding author M. J. Joyner: Departments of Anaesthesiology and Physiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Email: email@example.com
Efforts to understand human physiology through the study of champion athletes and record performances have been ongoing for about a century. For endurance sports three main factors – maximal oxygen consumption , the so-called ‘lactate threshold’ and efficiency (i.e. the oxygen cost to generate a give running speed or cycling power output) – appear to play key roles in endurance performance. and lactate threshold interact to determine the ‘performance ‘ which is the oxygen consumption that can be sustained for a given period of time. Efficiency interacts with the performance to establish the speed or power that can be generated at this oxygen consumption. This review focuses on what is currently known about how these factors interact, their utility as predictors of elite performance, and areas where there is relatively less information to guide current thinking. In this context, definitive ideas about the physiological determinants of running and cycling efficiency is relatively lacking in comparison with and the lactate threshold, and there is surprisingly limited and clear information about the genetic factors that might pre-dispose for elite performance. It should also be cautioned that complex motivational and sociological factors also play important roles in who does or does not become a champion and these factors go far beyond simple physiological explanations. Therefore, the performance of elite athletes is likely to defy the types of easy explanations sought by scientific reductionism and remain an important puzzle for those interested in physiological integration well into the future.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Faster, Higher, Stronger: these simple descriptions have been of interest to humans since the beginning of recorded history. In this context, integrative physiology has long been served by so-called ‘experiments in nature.’ These include asking fundamental questions about the ability of various animal species to function in harsh environments and studies on unique human patients with clinical conditions that offer the opportunity to ask important questions about physiological regulation (for examples see Hagberg et al. 1982; Faraci et al. 1984; Schrage et al. 2005). Along similar lines, studies on both human and animal performance in athletic events can provide important insights and raise critical questions about oxygen transport, muscle performance and metabolism, cardiovascular control, and the operation of various components of the nervous system (Joyner, 1991).
One of the first analyses of world records from A. V. Hill in 1925 (Hill, 1925) related the decline in running speed as race distance increased to the topic of muscle fatigue (Fig. 1). Even before then, the Italian physiologist Mosso, who was interested in fatigue associated with manual labour, noted ‘It is not will, not the nerves, but it is the muscle that finds itself worn out after the intense work of the brain.’ But Mosso hedged his bets and also commented that ‘fatigue of brain reduces the strength of the muscles’ (DiGiulio et al. 2006).
In Hill's analysis he speculated that the factors limiting performance in events of less than a minute and more than an hour are probably not dependent solely on the energy supply to the contracting muscles and discussed the physiological determinants of performance in the context of ideas about energy stores, oxygen demand and oxygen debt. He also speculated that there were ‘three types of fatigue’ (a concept he found to be inexact) including: (1) one associated with short violent efforts; (2) the exhaustion ‘which overcomes the body when an effort of moderate intensity is continued for a long time’; and (3) fatigue associated with a more general ‘wear-and-tear’. The first two types of fatigue were thought to be primarily ‘muscular’.
Additionally, for the second and third types of fatigue, which occur during endurance exercise, Hill speculated that as distances increase beyond about 10 miles (∼16 km), ‘The continued fall in the curve, as the effort is prolonged, is probably due to the second and third types of fatigue which we discussed above, either to the exhaustion of the material of the muscle, or to the incidental disturbances which may make a man stop before his muscular system has reached its limit. A man of average size running in a race must expend about 300 g of glycogen per hour; perhaps a half of this may be replaced by its equivalent of fat. After a very few hours therefore the whole glycogen supply of his body will be exhausted. The body, however, does not readily use fat alone as a source of energy; disturbances may arise in the metabolism; it will be necessary to feed a man with carbohydrate as the effort continues. Such feeding will be followed by digestion; disturbances of digestion may occur – other reactions may ensue. For very long distances the case is far more complex than for the shorter ones, and although, no doubt, the physiological principles can be ascertained, we do not know enough about them yet to be able further to analyse the curves.’ These comments and the work of Scandinavian physiologists in the 1930s set the stage for the concept of carbohydrate loading and a number of dietary and feeding strategies that have been shown to delay fatigue (Christensen, 1939; Sherman & Costill, 1984; Murray, 1998).
Focus of this review
In this review for The Journal of Physiology's 2008 Olympic Issue, we will focus on current models of human performance, review the physiological ‘ideas’ that led to these models, and ask what these models explain and more importantly do not explain. Figure 2 presents our concepts using a model like Hill's that is focused on ‘performance velocity’ and how it is determined by maximum rates of aerobic energy production, anaerobic capacity and how efficiently the energy being used is converted to movement.
In general, we focus on endurance exercise performance because it is our area of expertise, and there are relatively more data on the physiological adaptations that contribute to endurance performance, and (especially for running) there are accurate records extending for more than 100 years. There is also at least some physiological data on champion athletes over almost the same period of time.
Overview of current ideas about human performance
As noted above, most models of athletic performance focus on distance running and endurance cycling. First, there are excellent records and standard events. Second, there is comprehensive physiological data on a large number of elite athletes. Third, it is possible, using treadmills and cycle ergometers, to reasonably simulate in a laboratory what is happening during actual competition. We should also note that for the purposes of this review we assume that environmental conditions are ideal and do not add any additional challenges to physiological regulation (most notably the challenges associated with high altitude and/or high environmental temperatures).
In summary, values 50–100% greater than those seen in normally active healthy young subjects are seen in champion endurance athletes and the most striking adaptations to training that contribute to these high values include increased cardiac stroke volume, increased blood volume, increased capillary density and mitochondrial density in the trained muscles (Costill et al. 1976). Of these, the most dominant factor is a high stroke volume (Ekblom & Hermansen, 1968; Coyle et al. 1984; Martin et al. 1986).
Once it became reasonably clear that elite runners had high values for it also became clear that for events lasting beyond 10 or 15 min, most or all of the competition was performed at an average pace that did not evoke , with much of the 42 km marathon run at approximately 75–85% while 10 km is performed at 90–100% and 5 km at close to (Costill et al. 1973; Bassett & Howley, 2000). Along these lines, it has recently been shown that maximal aerobic metabolism can decline acutely during the course of a 5–8 min laboratory performance bout. This decline is caused by a fall in stroke volume and accelerated muscle fatigue due to reduced blood and oxygen delivery and increased anaerobic metabolism (Gonzalez-Alonso & Calbet, 2003; Mortensen et al. 2005). This does not invalidate the concept of , but rather indicates that the maximal rate of aerobic ATP resynthesis during a race is dynamic and that truly accurate models of energy turnover during actual competition would require instantaneous measurements and calculation of fluxes through multiple metabolic pathways (e.g. total ATP turnover with contributions from both aerobic and anaerobic components as well as energy stores).
Based on the concepts above the question then became what fraction of might be sustained for periods of time extending to several hours (i.e. the marathon) and what is the rate of glycolysis in the active muscles at this rate of mitochondrial oxidation. This question led to observations showing a curvilinear relationship between blood lactate values during exercise and the distance of the effort (Fig. 3; Costill, 1970) and led to the concept that the rate of aerobic metabolism maintained during a performance bout (i.e. performance ; Fig. 2) can be better described by the degree of muscle glycolytic stress reflected in lactate production in addition to (Farrell et al. 1979; La Fontaine et al. 1981).
In this context, as running speed or power output on a cycle ergometer increases in untrained subjects there is typically no sustained rise in blood lactate concentration until about 60% of is reached. In trained subjects this value can be 75–90% of (Fig. 4). There is a long history of investigation about what causes this rise in blood lactate levels and also how lactate (and/or hydrogen ion) does or does not contribute to fatigue. For this review the important summary points include: (1) the initial appearance of blood lactate is not synonymous with hypoxia in the skeletal muscle, and (2) the lactate molecule per se does not ‘cause’ muscle fatigue (Holloszy et al. 1977; Holloszy & Coyle, 1984; Robergs et al. 2004).
What appears to be occurring is that the maximum rate of fat oxidation is inadequate to meet the ATP demands of muscles contracting at moderate and high intensities. This causes intracellular signalling events to occur which stimulate glycogenolysis and glycolysis and ultimately the rate of pyruvate delivery to the mitochondria progressively exceeds the ability of the mitochondria to oxidize pyruvate and this leads to accelerated generation of lactic acid (Holloszy et al. 1977; Holloszy & Coyle, 1984; Robergs et al. 2004). The associated hydrogen ion is then a likely culprit in muscle fatigue and also activates group III and IV skeletal muscle afferents that evoke important cardiovascular and autonomic reflexes (Pryor et al. 1990).
While the physiological determinants of the lactate threshold are extremely complex, they are determined mainly by the oxidative capacity of the skeletal muscle (Holloszy et al. 1977; Davies et al. 1982; Holloszy & Coyle, 1984; Gregg et al. 1989a,b). This capacity is highly plastic and can essentially increase more than twofold in the trained skeletal muscle of humans or animals who engage in 20–120 min of training at a requisite intensity (Holloszy et al. 1977; Dudley et al. 1982; Holloszy & Coyle, 1984). This more than doubling of oxidative capacity is one of the factors that is linked to the high ‘lactate threshold’ values seen in elite endurance athletes (Fig. 2). As noted above, these elite athletes have values that are 50–100% above those seen in normally active sedentary young people and their lactate threshold occurs at a higher percentage of their . This means that in elite athletes the absolute oxygen consumptions (power output and/or speed) that can be generated for long periods of time before reaching the lactate threshold is essentially doubled allowing sustained running speeds of 20 km h−1 or cycling power outputs of 400 W.
Other key factors that reduce muscle fatigability and lactate production during exercise at 85–90%, when only a fraction of the total limb muscle mass is simultaneously recruited, is the quantity of muscle mass that the athlete can recruit to share in sustaining power production (Fig. 2). Elite cyclists appear capable of rotating power production through 20–25% more muscle mass throughout a 1 h bout of cycling, thus reducing the relative power production and stress on a given fibre (Coyle et al. 1988; Coyle, 1995). Additionally, this ‘power sharing’ among fibres would also reduce the glycolytic stress and lactate production per fibre due to more total mitochondrial sharing for a given rate of aerobic metabolism. These factors should operate in a complementary way that reduces the stress per mitochondria and muscle fibre.
As exercise extends beyond about 2 h the problem becomes one of fuel availability as (Hill predicted) the glycogen content in skeletal muscle becomes depleted and the modest ability of active muscle to take up glucose from blood (via either the liver or from feeding) can limit the rate of oxidative ATP generation and thus the pace that can be sustained. In some (but not all) subjects the associated reductions in blood glucose evoke frank symptoms of hypoglycaemia that limit the ability of the individual to continue exercising (Christensen, 1939; Coyle et al. 1983, 1986). Other highly trained subjects show remarkable resistance to hypoglycaemia and for these athletes muscle glycogen depletion is probably more important. In response to these events, a number of pre-competition dietary strategies and during-exercise energy replacement regimens and products have been developed (Murray, 1998). When these are used in an optimal manner muscle glycogen stores can be augmented by 40% before exercise, and hypoglycaemia can be avoided with the net effect being that the duration of exercise at about the lactate threshold can be extended by about one-third (from 2 to 3 h to 4 h) (Coyle et al. 1983, 1986; Sherman & Costill, 1984).
Performanceand anaerobic metabolism Without practical direct calorimetric methods to measure instantaneous rates of heat and work production during endurance exercise (Webb et al. 1988; Scott, 2000), the best practical estimation of the rates of actual metabolic energy production and ATP turnover is obtained from measures of oxygen consumption (i.e. indirect calorimetry) during an endurance performance bout. During marathon running the relative amount of anaerobic metabolism is small yet in events lasting 13–30 min (i.e. 5 and 10 km running), it will be significant, contributing perhaps 10–20% of total ATP turnover. This anaerobic contribution to ATP turnover during endurance performance bouts is noted in Fig. 2 and has classically been estimated from measures of post-exercise oxygen consumption and may equal the energy provided by 50–80 ml kg−1 of oxygen uptake (Fig. 2) (Bangsbo et al. 1993). However, the rate at which this energy might be generated and consumed is difficult to estimate in a definitive way.
Figure 2 also makes the point that the rate of total ATP turnover during endurance performance reflects the interplay of aerobic and anaerobic metabolism with lactate generation serving to maintain the NAD+ needed for continued glycolysis and generation of pyruvate. An example of this interplay appears to be the influence of high skeletal muscle capillary density, serving to remove or recycle within muscle fatiguing metabolites (e.g. hydrogen ions). As shown in Fig. 5, exercise time to fatigue at 88% in a population of cyclists (n= 14, individually numbered) possessing the same (i.e. 4.9 l min−1), as expected, was related to the percentage of at the blood lactate threshold. However, some subjects (see upper line in Fig. 5) were able to exercise longer than normal (see lower line in Fig. 5) even when accounting for their lactate threshold (i.e. subjects 1, 2, 7 and 8 in Fig. 4). For the most part, these individuals (i.e. 1, 2, 7 and 8) possessed an unusually high muscle capillary density which may have allowed their exercising muscles to better tolerate anaerobic metabolism and lactic acid production. For this reason, Fig. 2 indicates that ‘Performance , might be directly influenced by muscle capillary density, independent of its important role in delivering oxygen and reducing diffusion gradients, but also by removing waste products and limiting acidosis in the contracting muscles.
An additional point from Fig. 5 is that much remains to be learned about subtle factors that delay or accelerate fatigue during events performed at intensities above 80–90% of . Small increases in total energy expenditure or reductions in oxygen delivery will have disproportionate effects and accelerate fatigue (Mortensen et al. 2005) during very intense exercise. At this time it remains unclear if laboratory tests can detect the subtle adaptations in the very best performers who seem to be able manage their metabolism in a way that permits maximum efficient energy use.
Efficiency The next factor that makes an important contribution in endurance exercise performance velocity has been termed ‘economy’ or ‘efficiency.’ In the above sections we outlined how and the lactate threshold operate to determine ‘Performance , (Fig. 2). The next question then is how much speed or power can be generated for that level of oxygen consumption? The oxygen cost of endurance running (ml kg min−1) at a given speed can vary about 30–40% among individuals (Farrell et al. 1979; Conley & Krahenbuhl, 1980; Joyner, 1991), as shown in Fig. 6. When cycling at a given power output, the oxygen cost and thus gross mechanical efficiency also varies from one person to another, but by a somewhat lesser amount compared with running (i.e. 20–30%) (Coyle, 1995).
Gross mechanical efficiency when endurance-trained cyclists generate 300 W can vary from 18.5 to 23.5% and it appears that more than one-half of this variability is related to the percentage of type I (slow twitch) muscle fibres of the vastus lateralis muscle (Coyle et al. 1992). The efficiency with which the chemical energy of ATP hydrolysis is converted to physical work depends greatly on the velocity of sarcomere and muscle fibre shortening. Type I (slow twitch) fibres display greater mechanical efficiency when cycling at cadences of 60–120 r.p.m. Therefore, it is not surprising that elite endurance cyclists typically possess a higher percentage of type I muscle fibres, given that they are more efficient. Although type I muscle fibres in untrained humans possess higher mitochondrial density compared with type II fibres (fast twitch), it is important to note that with intense interval training, mitochondrial activity can be increased to equally high levels in both fibre types (Chi et al. 1983). Thus, with intense endurance training over years, the main functional advantage of type I fibres appears to be efficiency when cycling rather than total oxidative ability, although type I fibre seem to retain a greater ability to oxidize fat.
It is also of note that many champion cyclists chose pedal cadences of around 90 r.p.m. This is a cadence that may actually increase whole body oxygen consumption slightly for a given total body power output from the minimum which usually occurs at 50–60 r.p.m. In a comprehensive engineering/physiology analysis of this problem Hansen et al. (2002) noted that subjects with higher levels of myosin heavy chain I (MHC I, the predominant myosin in type I fibres) self-selected higher pedal rates and these rates closely matched the rate of peak mechanical efficiency. In this context, they speculated that motor control patterns in these subjects might favour a faster cadence so that relatively low total muscle forces (probably from fatigue-resistant motor units) per pedal stroke could generate the needed power so that the higher force (and more fatigable) motor units could be conserved. On a speculative note, with lower force per contraction there might be less compression of the microcirculation in the active muscle and better distribution of blood flow in a way that is consistent with the concepts presented in Fig. 5.
Running is a more complicated movement than cycling in that it elicits more stretch on the muscle prior to contraction and there is more potential to capture mechanical energy in the elastic elements of tissue. However, although there has been long-standing interest in identifying the biomechanical and anatomical factors that allow one person compared with another to expend 30–40% less energy per kilogram of body to move at a given velocity, the aetiology of differences in running economy generally remain a mystery, and biomechanical descriptions of running are not good predictors of running economy (Kyröläinen et al. 2001; Williams, 2007).
Elite endurance runners typically possess a predominance of type I muscle fibres and it would seem logical that they are more mechanically efficient at the velocities of distance running (Costill et al. 1976; Fink et al. 1977; Bosco et al. 1987). However, running and walking economy has not often been highly correlated with a person's percentage of type I muscle fibres (Morgan & Craib, 1992; Hunter et al. 2005). This agrees with the idea that running economy reflects the interaction of numerous factors including muscle morphology, elastic elements and joint mechanics in the efficient transfer of ATP to running speed.
The extent to which cycling efficiency or running economy can be improved with training has also been of long-standing interest. Until recently, it was generally believed that cycling efficiency and running economy did not improve much with training (Moseley et al. 2004). At best, running economy might sometimes increase slightly over the course of 2 months when explosive-type weight training is added to an endurance training program (Paavolainen et al. 1999; Millet et al. 2002). However, the conclusion that efficiency does not change with training was based on cross-sectional comparisons of relatively small numbers of endurance athletes (Moseley et al. 2004).
In this context, there are no comprehensive longitudinal data on groups of endurance athletes followed over several years to determine the trainability of cycling efficiency or running economy. However, there are at least two cases reporting that running economy can be improved over years of training in elite athletes (Conley et al. 1984; Jones, 2006). In fact, the current world record holder for the women's marathon displayed a remarkable 14% improvement in running economy over the course of 5 years of training (Jones, 2006). Furthermore, cycling efficiency was observed to increase 8% over the course of 7 years in an elite endurance cyclist (Coyle, 2005). In general, these case reports suggest that muscular efficiency and running economy might indeed improve with continued endurance training at a rate of approximately 1–3% per year. One possible contributing factor is that at least some of the fast myosin in endurance-trained muscle shifts to a different and perhaps more efficient isoform (Green et al. 1984). Additionally, in some models of extreme muscle use there can be a complete conversion of fast twitch to slow twitch muscle fibres, whether this occurs in elite athletes who train for two or more hours per day for many years is not known and it is further not known if such a shift would explain any improvements in efficiency that might occur with years of training (Pette, 2001).
Integrating current ideas about physiological limiting factors
The concepts above and in Fig. 2 suggest that and lactate threshold interact to determine how long a given rate of aerobic and anaerobic metabolism can be sustained (i.e. performance ) and efficiency then determines how much speed or power (i.e. performance velocity) can be achieved at a give amount of energy consumption. These relationships were hinted at by Hill in his 1925 paper (Hill, 1925) and were clearly defined in the period between 1970 and the early 1990s (Costill, 1970; Costill et al. 1973; Joyner, 1991; Joyner, 1993; Coyle, 1995; Bassett & Howley, 2000).
The Marathon In 1991, these concepts were used (Joyner, 1991) to predict that a much faster world record for the marathon was ‘physiologically’ possible based on the idea that marathon running speed was essentially predicted by the equation:
When reasonable estimates of the ‘best’ values ever recorded for these three parameters were used in this equation a predicted optimal marathon time of around 1:45 h emerged. Even when assumptions about wind resistance were added, times well under 2 h seemed possible. In retrospect, one overlooked possibility was that the values used in the estimates came from laboratory studies typically conducted while the subjects ran up a grade of 5–10% and these values may be ∼10% higher than those seen during level running (Morgan et al. 1989). However, even if the highest values seen during graded running protocols are not attainable during level running in many people, there are high enough and lactate threshold values that might result in sustainable oxygen uptakes, which in combination with outstanding running economy, would generate a marked improvement in current world record time. These comments reinforce the conclusions of this earlier modelling effort that either there are unknown factors that operate at high speeds that make such time ‘not’ achievable or that for some reason ‘best in class’ values for every factor are unlikely to occur in the same person (Lucia et al. 2002).
Some unanswered questions
In the context of the ideas above there are a number of fundamental unanswered questions. We have already highlighted questions about the determinants of efficiency especially for running, and for both running and cycling a key question is how ‘trainable’ this factor is. Additionally, we have discussed several factors beyond mitochondrial content and oxidative enzymes that may permit some athletes to operate for prolonged periods at especially high fractions of their . These factors may also be important in events like long distance cycling and cross country skiing that occur over varied terrain and are not conducted at an even physiological pace. In these competitions there are frequent bursts of more intense near-maximal activity lasting from a few seconds to a few minutes that are followed by periods of relative recovery.
A fundamental question is the role genetics plays in the attainment of world class status and truly elite athletic performance. There are a number of studies showing that key elements of the response to training in sedentary persons is widely variable and has a genetic component (Rankinen et al. 2006). There have also been reports suggesting that common single nucleotide polymorphisms might be over represented in either groups of elite endurance athletes or in sedentary subjects that respond most to training. The most notable example is the idea that I (for insertion) variant of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene is over represented among elite endurance athletes. However, in the largest cohort of elite athletes who have been both rigorously phenotyped and genotyped this association has not been confirmed and to date there are no genetic markers identified in humans that have been clearly shown to be more frequent in elite endurance athletes (Rankinen et al. 2000).
Another interesting example relates to the gene encoding for the skeletal muscle isoform of AMP deaminase. There is a common mutation of this gene that may be associated with lower exercise capacity and ‘trainability’ in untrained subjects (Rico-Sanz et al. 2003). While the frequency of the gene may be lower in elite endurance athletes there are still a number of elite performers who carry it so it does not appear to preclude the attainment of elite status and there is at least one example of an elite performer with essentially no AMP deaminase activity (Lucia et al. 2007; Rubio et al. 2005).
In this context, finding genetic markers that are strongly predictive of either success in endurance athletic performance or somehow preclude it is likely to be a daunting task because of the many cultural and environmental factors that contribute to success in sport, the many physiological factors that interact as determinants of performance, and the heroic nature of the training required. Ideas about culture are highlighted by the observation that while East African runners currently dominate international competition previously athletes from Australia and New Zealand, preceded by Eastern Europeans and even earlier the Finns showed remarkable levels of success. This geographical diversity argues against a simple genetically based set of answers to the problem of elite performance in endurance competition. In a parallel way, there is a low signal to noise ratio for many proposed genetic factors that might contribute to multifactorial medical conditions like heart disease, diabetes and hypertension and clear causal associations between genotype and phenotype are slow to emerge (Morgan et al. 2007).
Our concepts about factors that regulate and potentially limit endurance performance are not a radical departure from the intuitive logic introduced by Mosso and Hill. Elite athletic performance involves integration of muscular, cardiovascular and neurological factors that function cooperatively to efficiently transfer the energy from aerobic and anaerobic ATP turnover into velocity and power. The past four decades of research have described in great detail the cardiovascular and muscular factors that govern oxygen delivery to active muscles, oxidative ATP rephosphorylation and markers of metabolic stress. However, little advancement seems to have been made in identifying neurological factors that might alter motor unit recruitment during prolonged exercise in ways that limit fatigue. Although it has become increasingly apparent that muscular efficiency and economy are hugely important, the physiological determinants of running economy remain a mystery while myosin type appears important to cycling efficiency at cadences chosen in competition.
The outcome of all Olympic endurance events is decided at intensities above 85% and most require athletes to be relatively fatigue resistant at intensities that stimulate significant anaerobic metabolism. At this time, the literature contains insufficient data that specifically describe the actual total energy demands of competition, the amount of muscle that is active during competition, and the complex neural patterns by which power and velocity are maintained as fatigue and failure develop in the nervous, cardiovascular and muscular systems. Such data are needed both in absolute and temporal terms. In this context, more work is needed on highly trained athletes performing very intense exercise in real or simulated competitions.