Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Mechanical loading
- Muscle-derived ROS and glucose uptake
- AMPK as a downstream mediator
- p38 MAPK as a downstream mediator
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- References
- Appendix
Alternatives to the canonical insulin-stimulated pathway for glucose uptake are exercise- and exogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS)-stimulated glucose uptake. We proposed a model wherein mechanical loading, i.e. stretch, stimulates production of ROS to activate AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) to increase glucose uptake. Immunoblotting was used to measure protein phosphorylation; the fluorochrome probe 2′7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate was used to measure cytosolic oxidant activity and 2-deoxy-d[1,2-3H]glucose was used to measure glucose uptake. The current studies demonstrate that stretch increases ROS, AMPKα phosphorylation and glucose transport in murine extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle (+121%, +164% and +184%, respectively; P < 0.05). We also demonstrate that stretch-induced glucose uptake persists in transgenic mice expressing an inactive form of the AMPKα2 catalytic subunit in skeletal muscle (+173%; P < 0.05). MnTBAP, a superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic, N-acteyl cysteine (NAC), a non-specific antioxidant, ebselen, a glutathione mimetic, or combined SOD plus catalase (ROS-selective scavengers) all decrease stretch-stimulated glucose uptake (P < 0.05) without changing basal uptake (P > 0.16). We also demonstrate that stretch-stimulated glucose uptake persists in the presence of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K) inhibitors wortmannin and LY294001 (P < 0.05) but is diminished by the p38-MAPK inhibitors SB203580 and A304000 (P > 0.99). These data indicate that stretch-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle is mediated by a ROS- and p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism that appears to be AMPKα2- and PI3-K-independent.
Mechanical loading
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Mechanical loading
- Muscle-derived ROS and glucose uptake
- AMPK as a downstream mediator
- p38 MAPK as a downstream mediator
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- References
- Appendix
Mechanical stimuli, specifically contraction and stretch, increase rates of glucose uptake, free radical production and protein synthesis by muscle. There are two proposed mechanisms by which mechanical stimuli may regulate glucose uptake (Ihlemann et al. 1999; Richter et al. 2001). The first is a calcium-dependent mechanism, whereby the depolarization of the plasma and T tubule membranes preceding contraction stimulates sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release and glucose transporter four (GLUT4) translocation. This has been described as a ‘feed-forward mechanism,’ in that glucose uptake is increased before metabolic needs develop. The second is a load-dependent mechanism whereby the strain put on the muscle or force developed by the muscle elicits a ‘feedback mechanism’ closely associated with metabolic needs. During contraction, the muscle is activated, calcium changes rapidly, ATP consumption is high, metabolic by-products accumulate, and ROS are produced. In contrast, stretch does not activate voltage-dependent calcium release and myofilament interactions are minimal, lessening the potential contribution of calcium- and metabolic-related changes. Ihlemann et al. (1999) have tested the effect of force on insulin-independent glucose uptake and reported that contraction-induced muscle glucose uptake varies directly with force development during tetanic contractions and that stretch increases glucose uptake. We therefore were interested in studying the signalling mechanism by which force directs glucose uptake distinct from calcium- and metabolic-related events that occur during contraction.
Muscle-derived ROS and glucose uptake
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Mechanical loading
- Muscle-derived ROS and glucose uptake
- AMPK as a downstream mediator
- p38 MAPK as a downstream mediator
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- References
- Appendix
Skeletal muscle continually produces ROS at low levels under resting conditions (Reid et al. 1992b; Murrant et al. 1999) and at higher levels during contractile activity (Reid et al. 1992b). ROS represent a cascade of low molecular weight oxygen derivatives whose effects on cellular function are concentration dependent. ROS over-production has been suggested to cause oxidative damage to cellular function especially in many pathological conditions including diabetes (Yu, 1994) where oxidative stress has been linked to insulin resistance (Yu, 1994; Bonnefont-Rousselot, 2002). In addition to their pathological role, low levels (nanomolar to micromolar) of ROS may participate as second messengers in intracellular signal transduction pathways (Finkel, 1998; Stofan et al. 2000) including glucose transport signalling (Hayes & Lockwood, 1987; Cartee & Holloszy, 1990; Fischer et al. 1993; Kozlovsky et al. 1997; Sandstrom et al. 2006). Isolated mouse EDL muscles increased 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) uptake during repetitive tetanic contractions (Sandstrom et al. 2006). It is well established that contraction leads to increased endogenous ROS production (Reid et al. 1992b). N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant that opposes ROS action, inhibits contraction-induced glucose uptake without altering basal 2-DG uptake or uptake stimulated by insulin or hypoxia (Sandstrom et al. 2006). In aggregate, these observations suggest that glucose uptake may be increased by mechanically stimulated oxidant production.
AMPK as a downstream mediator
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Mechanical loading
- Muscle-derived ROS and glucose uptake
- AMPK as a downstream mediator
- p38 MAPK as a downstream mediator
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- References
- Appendix
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a proposed regulator of glucose uptake in exercising muscle. AMPK is a heterotrimeric serine/threonine kinase composed of a catalytic α subunit and two regulatory β and γ subunits (Mitchelhill et al. 1994; Hardie et al. 1998; Kemp et al. 1999). Each subunit has two or more different isoforms (Hardie et al. 1998). The AMPKα1 isoform, which is ubiquitously expressed (Stapleton et al. 1996), requires intense muscle contraction for activation (Hayashi et al. 2000; Musi et al. 2001b). Contrary to the α1 subunit, the AMPKα2 isoform is predominantly found in liver, heart and skeletal muscle (Stapleton et al. 1996) and is activated by moderate-intensity exercise (Hayashi et al. 2000; Musi et al. 2001b). We focused on the α2 subunit in our current study. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is a by-product of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) utilization. When ATP consumption is high and glucose levels are low, AMP levels increase. Elevated AMP binds and allosterically modifies AMPK, rendering it a better substrate for the upstream activating kinases and a less likely target for protein phosphatases. AMPK is thought to be regulated by factors that change the ratio of AMP : ATP such as hypoxia, heat shock, metabolic toxicity, exogenous ROS (Choi et al. 2001; Musi et al. 2001a; Fryer et al. 2002) and exercise (Musi et al. 2001a; Musi & Goodyear, 2003). Phosphorylation of threonine 172 (Thr172) in the activation loop of the α subunit is required for AMPK activation (Hardie et al. 1998).
p38 MAPK as a downstream mediator
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Mechanical loading
- Muscle-derived ROS and glucose uptake
- AMPK as a downstream mediator
- p38 MAPK as a downstream mediator
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- References
- Appendix
p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is a stress-activated protein serine/threonine kinase known to be responsive to oxidative stress (Clerk et al. 1998; Li et al. 2005). While controversial, some studies suggest p38 MAPK may mediate insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Sweeney et al. 1999; Somwar et al. 2000). More recently, studies suggest p38 MAPK may also mediate AMPK- and/or ROS-regulated glucose uptake. Selective p38 MAPK inhibition abolished the increase in glucose transport by acute exposure to (60–90 μm) H2O2 (Kim et al. 2006). 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR)-stimulated glucose transport was inhibited by the p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580, and also by overexpression of a dominant-negative p38 MAPK mutant (Xi et al. 2001).
We hypothesized that mechanical loading increases muscle-derived ROS, which in turn stimulate protein kinase activity and lead to increased glucose uptake. After stretch, we measured ROS production, AMPKα, Akt and p38 MAPK phosphorylation, and glucose uptake. To determine whether these signalling events are essential for increased glucose uptake, we used pharmacological and genetic interventions that target pathway components.
Discussion
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Mechanical loading
- Muscle-derived ROS and glucose uptake
- AMPK as a downstream mediator
- p38 MAPK as a downstream mediator
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- References
- Appendix
The present study demonstrates that stretch increases glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. This response appears to be mediated by endogenous ROS and p38 MAPK signalling. Our data provide no support for PI3-K/Akt or AMPKα2 involvement.
Early studies have shown that force developed during contraction is linearly proportional to glucose uptake (Ihlemann et al. 1999; Fujii et al. 2005). In these studies, the investigators shortened the muscle or decreased the voltage of electrical stimulation so that the muscle generated less force, and concurrently observed decreased contraction-stimulated glucose uptake. Sandstrom et al. recently reported that mechanical loading plays little role in contraction-mediated glucose uptake (Sandstrom et al. 2007). In this study, the authors used N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide (BTS, an inhibitor of myosin II ATPase) to block crossbridge activity, thereby inhibiting force production. Sandstrom et al. demonstrated that BTS reduced the force developed during contraction with no effect on glucose uptake. The difference in techniques among these three studies could explain the apparent discrepancies in their conclusion on the influence of mechanical load on glucose uptake. Ihlemann et al. altered the length of the muscle, Fujii and colleagues altered the amount of muscle activation while Sandstrom et al. inhibited cross-bridge formation to manipulate force development during contraction. In each of these studies, developed force was altered, in concert with other cellular properties including diffusion distance, cross-bridge interactions with thin filaments, metabolism, and/or calcium release. To minimize the contribution of the many cellular changes associated with contraction, we tested the contribution of mechanical load directly, via stretch. Many cellular responses differ between passive and active force development in the muscle, and perhaps it is this difference in stimuli which leads to distinct mechanical signal transduction pathways.
Skeletal muscles produce ROS at low levels under resting conditions (Reid et al. 1992b; Murrant et al. 1999) and at higher levels during contractile activity (Reid et al. 1992b). Despite the ubiquitous influence of muscle-derived ROS, few studies have tested the role of endogenous ROS on glucose uptake. Consistent with prior findings (Sandstrom et al. 2006), we demonstrate the non-specific antioxidant NAC suppresses load-stimulated glucose uptake. We further show that several ROS-specific scavengers are equally effective, suggesting ROS are the dominant oxidants responsible for stretch-stimulated glucose uptake. We demonstrate that ROS in general mediate the stretch-stimulated response. However, it is possible that NO and/or NO derivatives might also mediate the response based on published studies that already support a role for NO in insulin-independent glucose uptake (Balon & Nadler, 1997; Higaki et al. 2001).
The role of AMPK in contraction-stimulated glucose uptake has been a topic of considerable research. Early studies suggested AMPK might regulate contraction-stimulated glucose uptake: the effects of insulin and AICAR on glucose uptake are additive; the effects of AICAR and contraction are not (Hayashi et al. 1998). Further, contraction of isolated muscle activates AMPK in a load-dependent manner that parallels the contraction-associated rise in glucose uptake (Ihlemann et al. 1999; Fujii et al. 2005).
Recent studies of isoform specificity suggest AMPKα2 is not essential for contraction-stimulated glucose uptake (Mu et al. 2001; Fujii et al. 2005). Similarly, AMPKα2 does not appear to be essential for stretch-stimulated glucose uptake. Stretch clearly stimulated AMPKα phosphorylation. This response was undetectable in the AMPKα2-immunodepleted fraction, suggesting the AMPKα2 isoform is preferentially phosphorylated by stretch. However, stretch-stimulated glucose uptake was identical between wildtype and AMPKα2 inactive mice. Thus, stretch may activate AMPKα2, but this kinase does not appear to mediate the increase in glucose uptake.
Extracellular application of H2O2 appears to stimulate skeletal muscle glucose uptake through a PI3-K-dependent pathway (Kim et al. 2006; Higaki et al. 2008). Exogenous H2O2 was used to stimulate glucose uptake, which was inhibited with the PI3-K inhibitor wortmannin (Higaki et al. 2008). Kim et al. used glucose oxidase to generate H2O2 (60–90 μm) and were also able to increase glucose uptake in a PI3-K-dependent manner.
We found that muscle-derived ROS stimulate glucose uptake in response to stretch and that this increase persists in the presence of two distinct PI3-K inhibitors. Neither wortmannin nor LY-294002 abolished stretch-stimulated glucose uptake. LY-294002 did decrease the relative magnitude of the stretch response, suggesting PI3-K might partially modulate stretch-stimulated glucose uptake. However, this speculation is contradicted by the wortmannin data and is based on post hoc analyses of non-optimized experiments.
Our results appear to conflict with prior reports that extracellular H2O2 application increases glucose uptake in a PI3-K-dependent manner (Kim et al. 2006; Higaki et al. 2008). Several key differences could explain this dichotomy. First, the chemistry: muscle-derived ROS comprise a complex cascade of low molecular weight, redox-active molecules with different physical and chemical properties than H2O2. Second, the compartmentalization: exogenous H2O2 applied to the sarcolemmal surface is likely to activate different signalling cascades than ROS generated by mitochondria, NADPH oxidase or other internal sources. Third, the concentration: exogenous H2O2 was applied at concentrations a magnitude higher than the cytosolic levels predicted for internal ROS production (Higaki et al. 2008). Under our experimental conditions, PI3-K/Akt signalling does not appear to be essential for stretch-stimulated glucose uptake.
Another plausible candidate for the exercise-responsive pathway is p38 MAPK. In rat liver epithelial cells, ACIAR-stimulated glucose uptake was inhibited by the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580, or by overexpression of a dominant negative p38 MAPK mutant (Xi et al. 2001). In muscle, AICAR activated p38 MAPK concomitantly with AMPK, and AICAR-stimulated glucose uptake was blunted by SB203580 (Lemieux et al. 2003). A more recent study demonstrated that p38 MAPK is not a downstream component of AMPK-mediated signalling (Ho et al. 2007). These data suggest p38 MAPK is sufficient but not necessary for AICAR-stimulated glucose uptake.
In muscle, glucose uptake stimulated by exogenous ROS is dependent on p38 MAPK (Kim et al. 2006). Our results are consistent with this finding. In response to stretch, we observed early and sustained increases in p38 MAPK phosphorylation that preceded AMPK phosphorylation. Furthermore, two distinct p38 MAPK inhibitors abolished glucose uptake in response to stretch. Specificity is a question with any pharmacological inhibitor. For example, SB203580 is known to have non-specific affects on Akt phosphorylation. Therefore, we used a more specific p38 MAPK inhibitor, A304000, which inhibits p38 MAPK-mediated glucose uptake without affecting GLUT4 translocation or c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activity (Somwar et al. 2002) or altering Akt phosphorylation (Kim et al. 2006). Neither inhibitor affected basal glucose uptake. Our data suggest that p38 MAPK is necessary for stretch-dependent glucose uptake and that p38 MAPK is not a downstream component of AMPK-mediated signalling.
In summary, the current study demonstrates that the force developed during stretch is sufficient to stimulate glucose uptake and that this response is mediated by ROS. The mechanism by which stretch increases glucose uptake does not appear to involve AMPKα2 or PI3-K/Akt signalling. Instead, p38 MAPK is necessary. This novel signalling mechanism is distinct from canonical contraction- and insulin-stimulated signalling that increases glucose uptake. It may provide an alternative pathway for the development of novel therapeutic drugs to overcome insulin resistance.