SU-E-J-166: Sensitivity of Clinically Relevant Dosimetric Parameters to Contouring Uncertainty During Post Implant Dosimetry of Prostate Permanent Seed Implants

Authors

  • Mashouf S,

    1. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
    2. University of Toronto, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON
    3. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ravi A,

    1. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
    2. University of Toronto, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON
    3. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Morton G,

    1. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
    2. University of Toronto, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON
    3. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Song W

    1. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
    2. University of Toronto, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON
    3. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Purpose:

There is a strong evidence relating post-implant dosimetry for permanent seed prostate brachytherpy to local control rates. The delineation of the prostate on CT images, however, represents a challenge as it is difficult to confidently identify the prostate borders from soft tissue surrounding it. This study aims at quantifying the sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to prostate contouring uncertainty.

Methods:

The post-implant CT images and plans for a cohort of 43 patients, who have received I–125 permanent prostate seed implant in our centre, were exported to MIM Symphony LDR brachytherapy treatment planning system (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH). The prostate contours in post-implant CT images were expanded/contracted uniformly for margins of ±1.00mm, ±2.00mm, ±3.00mm, ±4.00mm and ±5.00mm (±0.01mm). The values for V100 and D90 were extracted from Dose Volume Histograms for each contour and compared.

Results:

The mean value of V100 and D90 was obtained as 92.3±8.4% and 108.4±12.3% respectively (Rx=145Gy). V100 was reduced by −3.2±1.5%, −7.2±3.0%, −12.8±4.0%, −19.0±4.8%, − 25.5±5.4% for expanded contours of prostate with margins of +1mm, +2mm, +3mm, +4mm, and +5mm, respectively, while it was increased by 1.6±1.2%, 2.4±2.4%, 2.7±3.2%, 2.9±4.2%, 2.9±5.1% for the contracted contours. D90 was reduced by −6.9±3.5%, −14.5±6.1%, −23.8±7.1%, − 33.6±8.5%, −40.6±8.7% and increased by 4.1±2.6%, 6.1±5.0%, 7.2±5.7%, 8.1±7.3% and 8.1±7.3% for the same set of contours.

Conclusion:

Systematic expansion errors of more than 1mm may likely render a plan sub-optimal. Conversely contraction errors may Result in labeling a plan likely as optimal. The use of MRI images to contour the prostate should results in better delineation of prostate organ which increases the predictive value of post-op plans. Since observers tend to overestimate the prostate volume on CT, compared with MRI, the impact of the contouring uncertainty on V100 and D90 fortunately, has a conservative effect of underestimating the prostate coverage.

Ancillary