SU-E-T-213: Comparison of Treatment Efficiency of Gamma Knife SRS Plans for Brain Metastases with Different Planning Methods

Authors

  • Feng Y,

    1. East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC
    2. East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
    3. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
    4. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    5. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Huang Z,

    1. East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC
    2. East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
    3. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
    4. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    5. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lo S,

    1. East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC
    2. East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
    3. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
    4. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    5. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mayr N,

    1. East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC
    2. East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
    3. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
    4. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    5. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Yuh W

    1. East Carolina Univ, Greenville, NC
    2. East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
    3. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
    4. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    5. University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Purpose:

To improve Gamma Knife SRS treatment efficiency for brain metastases and compare the differences of treatment time and radiobiological effects between two different planning methods of automatic filling and manual placement of shots with inverse planning.

Methods:

T1-weighted MRI images with gadolinium contrast from five patients with a single brain metastatic-lesion were used in this retrospective study. Among them, two were from primary breast cancer, two from primary melanoma cancer and one from primary prostate cancer. For each patient, two plans were generated in Leksell GammaPlan10.1.1 for radiosurgical treatment with a Leksell GammaKnife Perfexion machine: one with automatic filling, automatic sector configuration and inverse optimization (Method1); and the other with manual placement of shots, manual setup of collimator sizes, manual setup of sector blocking and inverse optimization (Method2). Dosimetric quality of the plans was evaluated with parameters of Coverage, Selectivity, Gradient-Index and DVH. Beam-on Time, Number-of-Shots and Tumor Control Probability(TCP) were compared for the two plans while keeping their dosimetric quality very similar. Relative reduction of Beam-on Time and Number-of-Shots were calculated as the ratios among the two plans and used for quantitative analysis.

Results:

With very similar dosimetric and radiobiological plan quality, plans created with Method 2 had significantly reduced treatment time. Relative reduction of Beam-on Time ranged from 20% to 51 % (median:29%,p=0.001), and reduction of Number-of-Shots ranged from 5% to 67% (median:40%,p=0.0002), respectively. Time of plan creation for Method1 and Method2 was similar, approximately 20 minutes, excluding the time for tumor delineation. TCP calculated for the tumors from differential DVHs did not show significant difference between the two plans (p=0.35).

Conclusion:

The method of manual setup combined with inverse optimization in LGP for treatment of brain metastatic lesions with the Perfexion can achieve significantly higher time efficiency without degrading treatment quality.

Ancillary