SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aunan, K., G. Patzay, H. A. Aaheim, and H. M. Seip 1998. Health and environmental benefits from air pollution reductions in Hungary. Science of the Total Environment 212(2–3): 245268.
  • Ayres, R. U., L. W. Ayres and B. Warr 2003. Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900–1998. Energy 28(3): 219273.
  • Ayres, R. U. and B. Warr 2005. Accounting for growth: The role of physical work. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16(2): 181209.
  • Bentzen, J. 2004. Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energy Economics 26(1): 123134.
  • Bezdek, R. and B. Hannon 1974. Energy, manpower, and highway trust fund. Science 185(4152): 669675.
  • Binswanger, M. 2001. Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect Ecological Economics 36(1): 119132.
  • Brookes, L. G. 1978. Energy policy, the energy price fallacy and the role of nuclear energy in the UK. Energy Policy 6(2): 94106.
  • Brookes, L. G. 1990. The greenhouse effect: The fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy Policy 18(2): 199201.
  • Brookes, L. G. 2000. Energy efficiency fallacies revisited. Energy Policy 28(6–7): 355366.
  • Chalkley, A. M., E. Billett, and D. Harrison 2001. An investigation of the possible extent of the re-spending rebound effect in the sphere of consumer products. Journal of Sustainable Product Design 1: 163170.
  • Goedkoop, M. J., C. J. G. van Halen, H. R. M. Riele, and P. J. M. Rommens 1999. Product service systems: Ecological and economic basics. Amersfoort , The Netherlands : PRé Consultants.
  • Goedkoop, M. and R. Spriensma 1999. The EcoIndicator 99. Amersfoot , The Netherlands : PRe Consultants.
  • Goodwin, P. B. 1978. Travel choice and time budgets. In Determinants of travel choice edited by D.Henscher and Q.Davli Farnborough , UK : Saxon House.
  • Greening, L., D. Green, and C. Difiglio 2000. Energy efficiency and consumption—The rebound effect—A survey. Energy Policy 28: 389401.
  • Grepperud, S. and I. Rasmussen 2004. A general equilibrium assessment of rebound effects. Energy Economics 26(2): 261282.
  • Grubb, M. J. 1990. Energy efficiency and economic fallacies. Energy Policy 18(8): 783785.
  • Haas, R. and P. Biermayr 2000. The rebound effect for space heating—Empirical evidence from Austria. Energy Policy 28(6–7): 403410.
  • Haas, R. and L. Schipper 1998. Residential energy demand in OECD-countries and the role of irreversible efficiency improvements. Energy Economics 20(4): 421442.
  • Hammitt, J. K., E. S. Belsky, J. I. Levy, and J. D. Graham 1999. Residential building codes, affordability, and health protection: A risk-tradeoff approach. Risk Analysis 19(6): 10371058.
  • Henly, J., H. Ruderman, and M. D. Levine 1988. Energy savings resulting from the adoption of more efficient appliances: A follow-up. The Energy Journal 2:163170.
  • Hertwich, E. 2005. Lifecycle approaches to sustainable consumption: A critical review. Environmental Science & Technology. Accepted for publication.
  • Hertwich, E. G. and M. Katzmayr 2003. Examples of sustainable consumption. Laxenburg , Austria : International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
  • Hertwich, E., and A. Strømman 2004. The environmental benefit of direct hydrogen fuel cell vehicles—An analysis of the assessment literature. Trondheim , Norway : Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Programme.
  • Hofstetter, P., J. C. Bare, J. K. Hammitt, P. A. Murphy, and G. E. Rice 2002. Tools for comparative analysis of alternatives: Competing or complementary perspectives Risk Analysis 22(5): 833851.
  • Hofstetter, P. and M. Madjar 2003. Linking change in happiness, time-use, sustainable consumption, and environmental impacts: An attempt to understand time-rebound effects. Zurich : Consultrix.
  • Howarth, R. B. 1997. Energy efficiency and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy 15(4): 19.
  • Jackson, T. 2005. Live better by consuming less? Is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(1–2): 1936.
  • Jalas, M. 2002. A time use perspective on the materials intensity of consumption. Ecological Economics 41: 109123.
  • Jalas, M. 2005. The everyday life-context of increasing energy demands: Time use survey data in a decomposition analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 9(1–2): 129146.
  • Khazzoom, J. D. 1986. An econometric model integrating conservation in the estimation of the residential demand for electricity. Greenwich , CT : JAI Press.
  • Khazzoom, J. D. 1980. Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy Journal 1(4): 2140.
  • Lovins, A. B. 1988. Energy savings from more efficient appliances: Another view. Energy Journal 9: 155162.
  • Noorman, K. J. and T. S.Uiterkamp, eds. 1997. Green households? London : Earthscan.
  • NOVEM (Netherlands Agency for Energy and the Environment). 2000. The Perspective Project: Towards an energy aware lifestyle. Sittard , The Netherlands : NOVEM.
  • Panayotou, T. and C. Zinnes 1994. Free-lunch economics for industrial ecologists. In Industrial ecology and global change, edited by R.Socolow, C.Andrews, F.Berkhout, and V.Thomas Cambridge : Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  • Papasavva, S. and W. R. Moomaw 1997. Life-cycle global warming impact of CFCs and CFC-substitutes for refrigeration. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(4): 7192.
  • Perrels, A. 2002. Understanding consumption patterns—Including time use, skills, and market failures. In Life-cycle approaches to sustainable consumption—Workshop proceedings. Laxenburg , Austria : International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
  • Roy, J. 2000. The rebound effect: Some empirical evidence from India. Energy Policy 28(6–7): 433438.
  • Saunders, H. D. 1992. The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy Journal 13(4): 131.
  • Saunders, H. D. 2000a. Does predicted rebound depend on distinguishing between energy and energy services Energy Policy 28(6–7): 497500.
  • Saunders, H. D. 2000b. A view from the macro side: Rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 28(6–7): 439449.
  • Schipper, L. and M. Grubb 2000. On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy 28(6–7): 367388.
  • Steen, B. 1999. A systematic approach to environmental priorities in product development (EPS). Version 2000—-general system characteristics. CPM 1999:4. Gothenburg , Sweden : Chalmers University.
  • Strauss, T. 1998. Review of Why Energy Conservation Fails by Herbert Inhaber. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(1): 147.
  • Takahaski, K. I., T. Kunioka, H. Tatemichi, T. Tanaka, and S. Nishi 2004. Environmental assessment of ICT Services: New Methodology considering ripple effects. Paper read at the Sixth International Conference on EcoBalance, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Takase, K., Y. Kondo, and A. Washizu 2005. An analysis of sustainable consumption by the waste input-output model. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(1–2), pp. 201219.
  • Thøgersen, J. and F. Olander 2003. Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(3): 225236.
  • Walker, I. O. and F. Wirl 1993. Irreversible price-induced efficiency improvements: Theory and empirical application to road transportation. The Energy Journal 14(4): 183205.
  • Wang, X. D. and K. R. Smith 1999. Secondary benefits of greenhouse gas control: Health impacts in China. Environmental Science & Technology 33(18): 30563061.