Talking with the Donkey: Cooperative Approaches to Environmental Protection
Article first published online: 8 FEB 2008
DOI: 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.3.51
Additional Information
How to Cite
Harrison, K. (1998), Talking with the Donkey: Cooperative Approaches to Environmental Protection. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2: 51–72. doi: 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.3.51
Publication History
- Issue published online: 8 FEB 2008
- Article first published online: 8 FEB 2008
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- 33/50;
- Accelerated Reductioni Elimination of Toxics (ARET);
- covenants;
- cooperative approaches;
- policy instruments;
- voluntary agreements
Summary
In recent years, governments throughout the world have expressed growing interest in cooperative approaches to environmental protection, including negotiated rulemaking, flexible approaches t o enforcement, and voluntary codes and agreements. It is often argued that cooperative approaches are more cost effective, more conducive t o innovation, and better able t o promote fundamental attitudinal change than traditional “command and control” regulation. However, the overly broad term “cooperative approaches” fails t o acknowledge fundamental differences among these novel po I icies, including distinct ions between mandatory and voluntary programs and between those that involve bipartite negotiations between government and business and those that invite participation by a broader range of interests. This article analyzes these cooperative approaches first by offering a framework to distinguish among various cooperative policy instruments. Second, the article critically examines theoretical arguments and empirical evidence concerning one class o f cooperative approaches, voluntary challenges and agreements. The most striking finding is how little we know about the effectiveness of voluntary approaches. This is a function not only of the quite recent experience with these approaches, but also of more fundamental inattention t o program evaluation and obstacles to evaluation inherent in voluntary programs. The article concludes with a call for a more rigorous program of research to examine the effectiveness of the new policy instruments and t o compare them with traditional regulation and market-based incentives.

1530-9290/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=6a3a02534566058379543c3b2bea5b2e04f485ef)
1530-9290/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=68ef93146a08b203799ccd28b8c5e1c52419d0c1)
1530-9290/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fe53f4c362f619ba455ed94bedec53f6886dd4f3)