Breastfeeding Knowledge, Breastfeeding Confidence, and Infant Feeding Plans: Effects on Actual Feeding Practices

Authors

  • JoCarol Chezem,

    associate professor, Corresponding author
    1. Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, and coordinator of clinical staff and resident research at Ball Memorial Hospital in Muncie.
      JoCarol Chezem, PhD, RD, Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306-0250. E-mail: 00jcchezem@bsu.edu.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Carol Friesen,

    assistant professor
    1. Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joan Boettcher

    1. Campus dietitian at Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH.
    Search for more papers by this author

JoCarol Chezem, PhD, RD, Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306-0250. E-mail: 00jcchezem@bsu.edu.

Abstract

Objective: To explore relationships among breastfeeding knowledge, breastfeeding confidence, and infant feeding plans and their effects on feeding practices in first-time breastfeeding mothers.

Design: Prospective descriptive design.

Setting: Telephone interviews were conducted prenatally and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum.

Participants: Seventy-four of 83 first-time mothers with prenatal intentions to breastfeed completed all study requirements. The majority were White (95%), between the ages of 21 and 30 years (73%), with a post–high school education (85%), and household incomes of more than 200% of the federal poverty guideline (88%).

Main Outcome Measures: Breastfeeding knowledge, breastfeeding confidence, planned infant feeding method, planned breastfeeding duration, weeks of daily human milk substitute feeding, breastfeeding duration, achievement of breastfeeding goals.

Results: Breastfeeding knowledge was strongly correlated with breastfeeding confidence (r= .262; p= .025) and actual lactation duration (r= .455; p= .0001). Compared with women planning to exclusively breastfeed their infants, those planning to combination feed planned shorter breastfeeding duration (p= .022), reported shorter actual duration (p= .004), and were less likely to meet their breastfeeding goal (p= .034). The variables maternal education, breastfeeding knowledge, and weeks of daily human milk substitute feeding were used to develop a prediction equation that correctly categorized 93% of participants who met their breastfeeding goal and 90% of those who did not.

Conclusions: Expectations and the actual breastfeeding experience differed among women planning to combination feed and those planning to exclusively breastfeed. Whether a cause or consequence, daily human milk substitute feeding was associated with negative breastfeeding outcomes.

Ancillary