SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • drug interactions;
  • adult, aged;
  • emergency service hospital

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References

Objectives: Many emergency department (ED) patients are at risk for drug interactions (DIs) because they are elders, and/or they have chronic illnesses requiring treatment with multiple medications. In the ED, medications may be added to complex treatment regimens without the benefit of screening for DIs. Emergency physicians may therefore cause DIs, or miss the opportunity to intervene against a pre-existing DI. Prior studies are contradictory regarding whether DIs are more likely to be due to medications administered or prescribed in the ED or medications prescribed elsewhere. Screening for DIs using computer software, such as that done by retail pharmacies, is now a standard of practice, and is done more frequently than when these other DI studies were reported during the previous decade. The authors monitored DIs among a focused, at-risk outpatient ED population, to test the hypothesis that ED-induced DIs have become the most common DIs in this population-at-risk. Methods: A retrospective convenience sample of 200 at-risk patients seen at a tertiary teaching hospital on selected dates of service was analyzed. Eligible patients were ED outpatients aged 60 years or more taking three or more medications, or any age taking five or more medications. Micromedex Drug-Reax software identified DIs. DIs had to represent “major” or “minor” severity, and have “excellent” or “good” literature documentation, to be scored as positive. Pre-existing versus ED-induced DIs were compared by chi-square. DIs were stratified by patient age and by number and type of medications taken. Results: The 200 outpatients (125 female, 75 male) had a mean age (±SD) of 64.5 (±17.6) years and were taking an average of 7.2 medications. Seventy-nine pre-existing DIs were noted, occurring in 50 of the 200 patients studied. One hundred forty patients received a new medication during their ED visit. Seven new DIs (one in each of seven patients) occurred among these 140 patients. DIs were less frequently caused by medications added during the ED visit (χ2= 22.2, p < 0.001). Digoxin and warfarin were the sources of the greatest number of DIs. Conclusions: ED outpatients in the at-risk group frequently present with pre-existing DIs. Medications initiated in the ED are a less frequent cause of DI in this group. Medication screening during an ED visit could complement the role of outpatient pharmacies and potentially improve ED patient safety. DIs are most frequently due to digoxin and warfarin in these patients.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References
  • Kohn, LT, Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS (eds). To Err Is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Report of the Institute of Medicine. Washington , DC : National Academy Press, 1999.
  • Hayward, RA, Hofer, TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA. 2001; 286:41520.
  • Ellenhorn, MS, Sternad, FA. Problems of drug interactions. J Am Pharmacol Assoc. 1966; NSG:628.
  • Langdorf, MI, Fox, JC, Marwah, RS, Montague, BJ, Hart, MM. Physician versus computer knowledge of potential drug interactions in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:13219.
  • Goldberg, RM, Mabeen, J, Chan, L, Wong, S. Drug—drug and drug-induced interactions in the ED: an analysis of high-risk population. Am J Emerg Med. 1996; 14:44750.
  • Beers, MH, Storrie, M, Lee, G. Potential adverse drug interactions in the emergency room. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:614.
  • Koechler, JA, Abramowitz, PW, Swim, SE, Daniels, CE. Indicators for the selection of ambulatory patients who warrant pharmacist monitoring. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989; 45:72932.
  • Halkin, H, Katzir, I, Kurman, I, Jan, J, Mallon, BB. Preventing drug interactions by on-line prescription screening in community pharmacies and medical practices. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:2605.
  • Ringgold, DJ, Santell, JP, Schnieder, PJ, Arenberg, S. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in acute care setting: prescribing and transcribing—1998. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999; 56:14257.
  • Moore, LL, Minnie, K, Moore, MB (eds). Drug-Reax® System. Greenwood Village , CO : Micromedex, 2002.
  • Glantz, SA. A Primer of Biostatistics: The Program, Version 4.02. New York : McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Health Professions Division, 1997.
  • Herr, RD, Caravai, EM, Tyler, LS, Long, E, Linscott, MS. Prospective evaluation of adverse drug interactions in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21:13314.
  • Karas, S. The potential for drug interactions. Ann Emerg Med. 1981; 10:62730.
  • Hohl, CM, Dankoff, J, Colacone, A, Afilalo, M. Polypharmacy, adverse drug-related events, and potential adverse drug interactions in elderly patients presenting to an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38:66671.
  • Chin, MH, Wang, LC, Jin, L et al. Appropriateness of medication selection for older persons in an urban academic emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6:123242.