SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • syncope;
  • fainting;
  • practice variation;
  • National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References

Objectives: To describe the characteristics and admission patterns of patients with syncope presenting to U.S. emergency departments (EDs). Methods: The ED portion of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1992–2000, was analyzed. Nationally representative weighted estimates for incidence and admission rates were estimated and stratified by demographic variables. Presence of cardiovascular diagnoses on ED discharge was noted. Results: Of the 865 million ED visits during the nine-year study period, an estimated 6.7 million (0.77%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.69% to 0.85%) were related to syncope. Higher incidences of ED visits for syncope were found in elder, female, and non-Hispanic patients compared with their reference groups. The overall admission rate was 32% (95% CI = 28% to 36%). Older, male, and white patients were admitted more frequently than their counterparts. Of patients older than 80 years of age, 58% (95% CI = 49% to 67%) were admitted. Associated cardiovascular International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), codes for ischemic, structural, and arrhythmic heart disease were noted in 10% (95% CI = 8% to 13%) of patients, and 66% (95% CI = 56% to 76%) of these patients were admitted. Conclusions: Syncope is a frequent reason for ED visits and admissions. Elders and patients with associated cardiovascular diagnoses are frequently discharged, and admission practices appear to deviate from consensus panel guidelines.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References
  • Schnipper JL, Kapoor WN. Diagnostic evaluation and management of patients with syncope. Med Clin North Am. 2001; 85:42356.
  • Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Santini M. Diagnosing syncope in clinical practice. Implementation of a simplified diagnostic algorithm in a multicentre prospective trial—the OESIL 2 study (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio). Eur Heart J. 2000; 21:93540.
  • Blanc, JJ, L'Her, C, Touiza, A, Garo, B, L'Her, E, Mansourati, J. Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23:81520.
  • Crane SD. Risk stratification of patients with syncope in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2002; 19:237.
  • Day, SC, Cook, EF, Funkenstein, H, Goldman, L. Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. Am J Med. 1982; 73:1523.
  • Martin, GJ, Adams, SL, Martin, HG, Mathews, J, Zull, D, Scanlon, PJ. Prospective evaluation of syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 1984; 13:499504.
  • Linzer, M, Yang, EH, Estes NA, III, Wang, P, Vorperian, VR, Kapoor, WN. Diagnosing syncope. Part 2: unexplained syncope. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127:7686.
  • Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients presenting with syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37:7716.
  • Thakore SB, Crombie I, Johnston M. The management of syncope in a British emergency department compared to recent American guidelines. Scott Med J. 1999; 44:1557.
  • 2000 NHAMCS Micro-Data File Documentation. Hyattsville , MD : National Center for Health Statistics, 2000.
  • National Center for Health Statistics. 1997 Reason for visit classification. Available at: http://www.cdc.govnchsdataahcdrvc97.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2004.
  • Schappert S. Calculation of standard errors for multiple years of NAMCS data. Hyattsville , MD : National Center for Health Statistics, 2002.
  • Kapoor, W, Snustad, D, Peterson, J, Wieand, HS, Cha, R, Karpf, M. Syncope in the elderly. Am J Med. 1986; 80:41928.
  • Blanchard JC, Haywood YC, Scott C. Racial and ethnic disparities in health: an emergency medicine perspective. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:128993.
  • Richardson LD, Hwang U. America's health care safety net: intact or unraveling? Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8:105663.
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report. Rockville , MD : AHRQ, Jul 2003.
  • Colivicchi, F, Ammirati, F, Melina, D, Guido, V, Imperoli, G, Santini, M. Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24:8119.
  • Quinn, JV, Stiell, IG, McDermott, DA, Sellers, KL, Kohn, MA, Wells, GA. Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 43:22432.
  • Martin TP, Hanusa BH, Kapoor WN. Risk stratification of patients with syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 29:45966.
  • Sarasin, FP, Hanusa, BH, Perneger, T, Louis-Simonet, M, Rajeswaran, A, Kapoor, WN. A risk score to predict arrhythmias in patients with unexplained syncope. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:13127.