You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Prevalence of Traumatic Hip and Pelvic Fractures in Patients with Suspected Hip Fracture and Negative Initial Standard Radiographs—A Study of Emergency Department Patients

  1. Shari Dominguez MD1,
  2. Patrick Liu MD1,
  3. Catherine Roberts MD1,
  4. Mark Mandell MD2,
  5. Peter B. Richman MD1,*

Article first published online: 28 JUN 2008

DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.024

Issue

Academic Emergency Medicine

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volume 12, Issue 4, pages 366–369, April 2005

Additional Information

How to Cite

Dominguez, S., Liu, P., Roberts, C., Mandell, M. and Richman, P. B. (2005), Prevalence of Traumatic Hip and Pelvic Fractures in Patients with Suspected Hip Fracture and Negative Initial Standard Radiographs—A Study of Emergency Department Patients. Academic Emergency Medicine, 12: 366–369. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.024

Author Information

  1. 1

    Departments of Emergency Medicine and Radiology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ

  2. 2

    Department of Emergency Medicine, Morristown Memorial Hospital (MM), Morristown, NJ.

**Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85054. Fax: 480-342-1774; e-mail: prichmanmd@aol.com

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 28 JUN 2008
  2. Article first published online: 28 JUN 2008
  3. Received July 23, 2004; revision received October 27, 2004; accepted October 27, 2004.

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (67K)

Keywords:

  • hip fracture;
  • MRI;
  • emergency department

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of hip and pelvic fractures in emergency department (ED) patients with hip pain and negative standard initial radiographs. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study at an academic, community-based ED. ED patients presenting during a one-year period with hip pain for whom a plain-film radiograph was obtained were included. Eligible patients were identified by query of electronic records. Plain radiographs and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were ordered at the discretion of the treating physician. Initial plain radiographs were read at the point of care by board-certified radiologists. MRI images were reviewed by radiologists with fellowship training in musculoskeletal imaging. Structured follow-up at more than one month postvisit was conducted to rule out a subsequent diagnosis of hip fracture. Ninety-five-percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) and kappa (κ) were calculated as appropriate. Results: Seven hundred sixty-four of 895 patients (85.3%) had follow-up completed (study group). Within the study group, 219 patients (29%) had evidence of fracture on initial radiographs. Of the 545 patients with negative initial radiographs, 62 patients (11.4%) underwent hip MRI during the ED visit. MRI identified 24 additional patients with hip fractures. Interobserver agreement for the presence of fracture on MRI was very good (κ= 0.847). For patients with negative initial plain radiographs who did not have a hip MRI, follow-up did not identify any of these patients as having a subsequent diagnosis of fracture. Thus, 24 of 545 (4.4%; 95% CI = 3.0% to 6.5%) patients with negative initial plain radiographs had a hip fracture. Conclusions: In this cohort of ED patients with symptoms suspicious for hip fracture who had negative standard radiographs, the authors found that 4.4% were subsequently diagnosed as having fracture. Further studies are warranted to identify characteristics of patients requiring advanced hip imaging studies.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. References
  • Melton L. Hip fracture: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow. Bone. 1993; 14:51–8.
  • Cummings S, Rubin S, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States: numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop. 1990; 252:163–6.
  • Oka M, Monu J. Prevalence and patterns of occult hip fractures and mimics revealed by MRI. AJR. 2004; 182:283–8.
  • Lim, K, Eng, A, Chng, S, Tan, A, Thoo, F, Low, C. Limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the occult hip fracture. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2002; 31:607–10.
  • Pandey, R, McNally, E, Ali, A, Bulstrode, C. The role of MRI in the diagnosis of occult hip fractures. Injury. 1998; 29(1):61–3.
  • Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenburg GH et al. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rule. JAMA. 1994; 271:827–32.
  • Stiell IG, Wells GA, Hoag RH et al. Implementation of the Ottawa knee rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. JAMA. 1997; 278:2075–9.
  • Seaberg, DC, Yealy, DM, Lukens, T, Auble, T, Mathias, S. Multicenter comparison of two clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute, high-risk knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32:8–13.
  • Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001; 286:1841–8.
  • Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, Todd, KH, Zucker, MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343:94–9.
Get PDF (67K)